Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Apparently horsepowerinabox DOES do garret IW housing for 3071R, and at a good price. I'll double-check the exact specs to make sure, but i've found that they do a 0.63 3071R for a very good price WITH braided fitting kit if needed. To quote:

"I can do one with the garrett internal pattern .63 gt3071 (in stock), oilwater kit in braided and a dump flange for $2050 delivered. you will need to mess with inlet plumbing. the 3071 comes with either a 4" or 2 1/2" comp inlet as well.. turbo alone $1750 del."

Itd be good if everyone interested in a 3071R eventually posted up theyre supplier, would make for a really good thread on these turbos. When i get mine soon from wherever i finally decide, I'll definitely put it up there.

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey, I found a 3071 on the net for sale that is direct bolt up to RB25's.

Compressor Housing A/R -: 0.70a/r

Turbine Housing A/R -: 1.06a/r

Does this sound capable of 280rwkw?

lol, a 1.06ar rear housing? you putting it on a rotary, or like lag up to 5,000rpm?

Edited by The Mafia
what you should be asking is "does this sound like a 3071" because is doesn't.

I'd be interested to see a link.

check this one out...

http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_info.p...roducts_id=6598

HPIAB do something very similar for a little extra

Is that too laggy?

If you want a real GT3071R at a good price try these guys.

http://www.full-race.com/catalog/product_i...36b21a75b9fca84

$1149(USD) (AU $1285) plus shipping is the cheapest I have found it.

disco, could you please post up all the exact specs of the real gt3071r for me. i had it written down from copying it from a post in another thread which i can't find. i've already given my mechanic the specs, i just wanted to double check i gave him the correct ones. my mechanic's speaking to garrett 2morrow, just want to be really careful i get the right one

i'll most likely be going the 0.63 a/r. would you expect much difference in lag/power between the 0.63 and the 0.84?? eg. when would you expect them both to come on full boost (say 17psi) and how difference in max power do you think there would be??

finally what difference would going the 2.75inch inlet as opposed the 4inch make??

thanks heaps for your help :)

cheers :D

check this one out...

http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_info.p...roducts_id=6598

HPIAB do something very similar for a little extra

Is that too laggy?

Interesting, they have a pic of the t28IW spec 3071, but their description is miles off. the 550Hp rating and the .7 comp cover point towards it being a 3076 with the t04s front wheel (3037 as advertised on HPIAB) not the 71mm wheel. And the 3071 only comes in a .5a/r compressor housing from garret, though i'm 99% certain the HKS variants are a .6 comp cover.

There's no way i'd put a 1.06 housing on one of these turbos. It would defeat the purpose of going for a small compressor. Mine will be a .63. I'm sure disco could provide convincing arguments about going for a .82 :D

oblivion, specs of the proper 3071 http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...T30/GT3071R.htm

Ignore the picture. I think they got lazy and put up a pic of a 3076 cart as it looks to be the .6 comp cover with the anti surge mod

  • 2 weeks later...

dont wont to start a new thread for silly question so could someone tell me the specs on the std r33 comp cover, outlet, inlet sizes and a/r.

I have a gt3076 with machined out std comp cover and i'm starting to wonder if this is a bottle neck?

thanks

dont wont to start a new thread for silly question so could someone tell me the specs on the std r33 comp cover, outlet, inlet sizes and a/r.

I have a gt3076 with machined out std comp cover and i'm starting to wonder if this is a bottle neck?

thanks

rofl, you're using a Machined out stock front cover on a GT3076? Thats madness.

Throw it away and get real covers.

Off topic but i picked up my turbo today from GCG. GT3076r (or GT3037S) with .6 port shroud front and .63 rear, will be getting tuned very soon so will post up results. Compressor looks SEXY!! :)

What I call the real Garrett GT3071R .

Turbine is 60mm OD GT30 in 84 trim .

Compressor is 71.1mm 56 trim GT 35 series .

Turbine housing SHOULD be a Garrett GT30 T3 flanged one in 0.63 or 0.82 0r 1.06 A/R ratio . Int or ext gate available .

Compressor housing is generally a T04E series in 0.50 A/R ratio . Can be 4" or 2.75" inlet boss .

I'm not sure that the larger bell mouthed type makes a significant difference and IMO its more about what sized plumbing you want to run between the filter/AFM and the comp housing .

Part no's : Cartridge number MUST be 700177-23 , anything different will not be the same wheel combination .

I don't think there is a complete unit part number as Garrett intended people to buy the cartridge and fit optional compressor and turbine housing kits .

Out of time ATM back later , cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...