Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The question remains; Is an intake modification considered an engine modification?

I'm pretty sure you'd be allowed to get a bigger exhaust (provided noise was kept legal) so I can't se a problem with the othert end of the engine.

You could probably successfully argue that the engine is completely stock, which it is, and your car keeps with the letter of the law.

The wasy I read it is that they're trying to keep p-platers out of bored and stroked engines.

I think that if you were being a tool on the road, the copper would pull you over and give you a ticket. If not for the pod then for noise or anything he could think of. They consider it part of their job to make life difficult for hoons.

If you're driving sensibly, I don't think you'd have a problem. I've only been pulled over once in my skyline, and that was when it had no plates on, as I was on my way to compliance. I've even been waved through plenty of bretho's etc, although, I am not on my P's, so it's not quite the same.

I reckon you'd be safe, but the risk is up to you really.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hmm, yeh i think your right, just be on the safe side i guess.

btw, whats the induction noise like in a gts? i would never have thought it would be that loud to be noticed?

Edited by sillylankan
There is one CLEAR answer - "Any modification that has the potential to alter a cars performance may be deemed as a power modification". Simple, the law is black and white, not shades of grey as some people would like to think.

And thats the point really right there :(

There is no way to "read" it differently when its spelled out in plain english i reckon

i would classify it as an engine mod and im pretty sure so would the cops. my car has a yellow air filter in it and im not sure what brand it is but it makes a sucking sound but its not very loud though. the weired thing is ive driven past lots of cops in my skyline and they have never pulled me over at all. in my area they tend to just pull over old bombs and holdens and fords with stockies on the rear.

An interesting and sensible topic...I have another option for you, fit a cotton panel filter as suggested by other posters, they're really very good. Then take the top off of your airbox and make some discreet slots or holes in the sides that face forward and towards the innerguard, do it on those sides only...rear and engine side will suck in too much hot air. Cutting the slots right on the corner is easiest

a hand saw would do the job. Do a neat job and it will never be picked. Less heat soak than a pod and it will give you increased flow and maybe even that induction sound you yearn.

DO NOT MAKE HOLE BELOW THE FILTER>>>DO THE LID ONLY it's also easy to change back if things aren't running as well as you'd like.

I have been doing this on gtst's for a while and have had np's performance wise unlike pods in hot weather.

Rick

hmm, yeh i think your right, just be on the safe side i guess.

btw, whats the induction noise like in a gts? i would never have thought it would be that loud to be noticed?

It aint loud at all.. infact i dont even notice it on there (thats with my k&n anyway) i wouldn't mind a bit of a woosh noise but dont exactly want to spend the 100 bucks again on another pod yet, im actually thinking of taking it off and putting the stock air box back in because i think the performance could be better (especially now with the heat) even though i have it sectioned off from the engine heat and still have the stock cold air intake atm. Maybe buy a electronic BOV if you want the SSSSSSSSSSTUTUTTUTUTU... jks (they actually have them tho :s)

An interesting and sensible topic...I have another option for you, fit a cotton panel filter as suggested by other posters, they're really very good. Then take the top off of your airbox and make some discreet slots or holes in the sides that face forward and towards the innerguard, do it on those sides only...rear and engine side will suck in too much hot air. Cutting the slots right on the corner is easiest

a hand saw would do the job. Do a neat job and it will never be picked. Less heat soak than a pod and it will give you increased flow and maybe even that induction sound you yearn.

DO NOT MAKE HOLE BELOW THE FILTER>>>DO THE LID ONLY it's also easy to change back if things aren't running as well as you'd like.

I have been doing this on gtst's for a while and have had np's performance wise unlike pods in hot weather.

Rick

errrm, let me get this straight - ur saying to make slits/holes above the filter?

So whats filtering the dusty air getting in?

errrm, let me get this straight - ur saying to make slits/holes above the filter?

So whats filtering the dusty air getting in?

The filter?

If you are making holes in the lid the air still has to pass through the filter. Same basic principle as the snorkel

errrm, let me get this straight - ur saying to make slits/holes above the filter?

So whats filtering the dusty air getting in?

In short ...THE FILTER :rolleyes:

2 spell it out...

Your induction pipe runs into the airbox lid... the lid holds the filter in place @ the top of the air box.

So to answer the question if I drill holes or cut slots into the front right hand corner of the lid (not the top its 2 visible)

the air filter catches the dust or whatever tha same as it alway does. This just increases flow and reduces cavitation for 0 cost.

If you want it easily reversable go and get some rubber bungs/grommets from super cheap or similar then drill holes 2 suit the bungs instead of slots in the airbox lid.

don't like it..........plug holes with bungs and your back 2 stock.

DO NOT MAKE HOLES IN YOUR AIRBOX!!!! just the front r/h/s corner of the lid (furthest from the engine) less heat there

Just to crarify again the holes/slots are to be made on the r/h/s corner down the side of the AIR BOX LID

It's a very simple mod, the ones I like the best.

Delljits on the money...basically the same setup, just it's free to do. you still have the nice cold air from the induction pipe but you also get added volume by doing this...and the airs still pretty cool @ the front corner off the engine bay.

Edited by madbung
think i better play it safe and not get one

i have already sacrificed a turbo. what is a pod filter

my car right now is stock as a rock besides a muffler modification.

yeh, my point exactly. There's not really much point spending money on performance mods for your car for two main reasons, 1 being that they arnt gonna do much, and 2 being a p plater makes it very hard for you and risky with the new laws. Hold out till you get off your p's and buy a turbo model.

you will be sweet i rekon. if it worries you that much id just get an apexi panel, or KnN, take out the sound deadening padding on the inside of the top of the box and be done.

It may not give you a louder noise than a pod. but hey.. it helps. At the end of the day, you would probably be fine, but if your concerned about it then dont bother.

think i better play it safe and not get one

i have already sacrificed a turbo. what is a pod filter

my car right now is stock as a rock besides a muffler modification.

So you have replaced your stock rear muffler?

If so put the pod on (if you like) as you have already broken the law, and if a cop is going to get you for the pod, he'll get you for the muffler too.

Pods, mufflers, extractors, fmic, etc are ALL considered as performance enhancing mods.

I don't think so either, but if they do, I don't think it'll be much.

You would be suprised. Got a 3A Racing pod on mine. Give it some stick and it sounds great :D

Finster, I would be more concerned with the exhaust mod you have than the pod filter. Id say that would be the first thing cops would be looking for on a P plater car. Like Al said, you might aswell chuck a pod in it now. Just keep it nice and neat and when you get off your p's, sell it and buy a gtst. Or, if it has too much sentimental value, decide to respray it, become too attached to it and don't want to sell it anymore (like I have), do a conversion (like I am) ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...