Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats so bad that they can just pull you up in another suburb and get you to follow them there, what if you had to be somewhere, i mean fair enough if you drive past and they pull you in, or pull you over on the road and defect you or sumtin. are they allowed to pull you up and just say follow me through a few suburbs so we can look at your car, sounds like harrasment or somthing

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sure can. Happed a fair bit last year. Even cars like 4GIVME got done in this way - was seen by other cars in same empty factories and such. I think they had one going off parra rd too.

The one in castle hill was a showground or something. Next to council building. Very dodgey.

thats farked, id be seriously pissed if that happened to me, its just wasting your farkin time, like at least an hour of it if you have to drive somwhere else, then what if your car passes, they've just wasted your time, what if you had somwhere important you had to be.

i heard about a guy today who was getting done by the EPA At brighton he got fined $15,000 Man id be killing myself right about now....

I ended up fitting a standard airbox it wasnt a GTR One but was one were my chrome pipinmg can get into.... went to the guy again at Granville He wouldnt pass it Because there wasnt Air flowing from the top of it through the filter into the turbos... This guy Man i swear is doing my head in..I cant wait until this is all over....

can you go to another guy, and also is this guy an old or young guy just out of curiosity?

probably in his 40s

this guy's own son's commonwhore (what else) was louder than my exhaust.....most of the car in his workshop is louder when they were moving them around....but i had to get mine passed !

he didnt even pass me when i rocked up with a full oem gtr exhaust! i ended up wasting $250 for parts and labour + $100 for him to pass the car with his fees (everytime you get tested you get charged!) and a couple of days off from work

one of the biggest rorts around i reckon....especially when there are only 2 workshops to choose from....this one or the one at Campbelltown.

what if you got smaller piping or anything like that between the turbos and intercooler, that will fit or that you can manage to bend around the stock box, then just find a way to disengage the turbos, so the pipes wont even need to run anything, drive it there and back, and your done.

BTW if you change the box is he gonna make you do another emmisions and noise test??

haha now u understand what i went through, but i got off lucky,

all this drama for a Fcukn Pod!

na na ive already passed the emissions test doesnt matter... I will have to do a noise test again because i am going cambeltown but i will pass beacuse ive put a stock box on now rather then the aluminium one which means less noise corect ?? well i hope so ???

Thats the dillemma i have the guy at granville only have to pass my filter box but the guy is a big d** head so im gona go striaght to cambeltown hopefully i get treated better there...

Edited by MRGTR911

If by "the guy at Campbelltown" you are referring to the Defect Notice Clearance Inspection Station, then i can shed some light for you. To me he appeared quite reasonable and approachable. I had been pulled over on Parramatta Rd and escorted to one of these make shift inspection stations in a industrial factory complex, at which point the examiner was overcome by the quantity of mods before him, Larger turbo's, pods, ebc, cams, cam gears (visible), larger FMIC, ecu, etc, so much so that he generalized the defect to read "all engine mods to comply with relevant ADR's & exhaust noise check".

I took my vehicle to TIC and had it engineered, covered the pods with an aluminium housing (painted black), stuffed a restrictor in the exhaust and generally hid the things i didn't want seen.

Went to the Campbelltown Guy, he took the engineers word for all on the report, no follow-up noise check, no probs with the enclosed pods, passed first go, defect cleared.

BTW every time i'm RBT'd i get asked to pop the bonnet, i produce the Engineers Report, engine bay checks ok, get hassled re noise (have since fitted HKS Silent Hi Power 95db), i assure them it gets quieter with rpm, rev engine to oblige and have thus far been allowed on my way.

Sorry for your pain, it annoyed the hell out of me at the time, i can only imagine what your going through.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...