Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys can anyone advise as to whether a standard PFC is sufficient for 300rwkw with standard internals or djetro required.?

What power figures require the djetro..?

I'd rather not get the djetro if not required as I've been told that it costs alot more to tune etc.

Its for a 32gtr.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194923-standard-pfc-or-djetro/
Share on other sites

For most setups both tune the same and one takes no longer than the other, the std PFC is good for whatever AFm you choose to use. i tend to use the d-jetro for radically cammed engines as it actually tunes up quicker... generally speaking the std PFC will offer better fuel economy.

For most setups both tune the same and one takes no longer than the other, the std PFC is good for whatever AFm you choose to use. i tend to use the d-jetro for radically cammed engines as it actually tunes up quicker... generally speaking the std PFC will offer better fuel economy.

Thanks alot for the info about tuning(I thought standard comes with a base tune, where djetro had to be tuned from scratch.?).

So it really then depends whether I can achieve 300rwkw with standard AFM's......is this possible....or do I need Z32's...??

Edited by PX29

well the Ljetro gets better economy as it runs MAFs instead of the twin map sensors on the Djetro version. they both come with base maps to start from. MAF sensors effectively measure air density/flow where as map sensors just measure pressure so under lots of condition the MAF sensor gives a finer reading.

they both cost the same to tune, but the big difference is the Djetro costs a lot more to install as you need to remove the plenum to fit the pressure feeds for the map sensors (unless you want to risk dropping swarf into the engine). the Ljetro of course is just plug in. BUT I would suggest that 300rwkw updraged MAF sensors is a good idea. either VG30s or Nismos etc. standard 26 Mafs will hit 5.115v at about 260rwkw. you can still tune a car with them to about 300rwkw or even more if you want, but it's much nicer to have a sensor that is still giving usable readings right to peak power/air flow.

well the Ljetro gets better economy as it runs MAFs instead of the twin map sensors on the Djetro version. they both come with base maps to start from. MAF sensors effectively measure air density/flow where as map sensors just measure pressure so under lots of condition the MAF sensor gives a finer reading.

they both cost the same to tune, but the big difference is the Djetro costs a lot more to install as you need to remove the plenum to fit the pressure feeds for the map sensors (unless you want to risk dropping swarf into the engine). the Ljetro of course is just plug in. BUT I would suggest that 300rwkw updraged MAF sensors is a good idea. either VG30s or Nismos etc. standard 26 Mafs will hit 5.115v at about 260rwkw. you can still tune a car with them to about 300rwkw or even more if you want, but it's much nicer to have a sensor that is still giving usable readings right to peak power/air flow.

Thanks for the response, very informative.

Bit confused with this Ljetro..?.....is this another name for the standard PFC...?,..cant seem to find it on the Nengun or Greenline webpages.

What would be the go then..... Standard, Djetro, Ljetro...?? Dont want to spend more than I need too..

Trying to determine which one is best suited for me.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
Thanks Beer Baron

Ljetro is just the normal PFC

Cool.

Been reading from the link below and there seems to be no real advantage going with the Djetro.

http://paulr33.sauvic.com.au/docs/powerfc-...erfc-faq.htm#61

Standard/Ljetro PCF seems to be the go-er at this stage. Anyone else want to enlighten me with their experiences or recommendations. I want to order a unit soon so I can start the 5-6week wait.

Cheers,

paulr33 suffers from MAPphobia :D

But in all seriousness, talk your tuner and discuss what he is most comfortable with.

I have seen Djetro installs on standard GT-Rs make power gains over the standard MAF version PFC without losing drivability.

Ive seen MAF make better power on GTRs with stock throttlebodys and found power with Djetros by finding ways of stopping the MAP pulse that they(And all other MAP ECUs)have,Mickos ex GTR is way down on power with its Djetro than it was with MAF PFC (400hp MAF 380hp Djetro) I spend much time Datalogging MAP signals and find good gains when we get a smooth input. 300KW is easy for MAF so you wont have to upgrade.

Sorry to hijack, but im looking at going d-jetro as well, and for me to sell the L and get a D is cheaper than buying AFMS for the L.

Ill need a new tune with the new engine package, and im going to make custom intake piping anyway whether if be for 80afm or no afm....

Whats best? Engine will be -5 equipped.

I run the D-jetro on my RB26 - I find I have no dramas at all, runs well, was easy to tune, comes with a base map etc. Common misconception is that you have to remove the inlet manifold. I can confirm this is NOT the case - I have my MAP sensors connected via a T piece to a vacuum feed on the inlet manifold and it runs fine. Talking with the guys at Willal racing, this is exactly what they do and haven't found any differences over running it this way vs drill and tapping fittings into the runners.

Benefits on the d jetro - removing the AFM removes inlet restrictions, also there is obviously no need to upgrade your AFM's once you max them out so that saves you quite a conserable amount of $$.

Economy - I am still obtaining 400 - 430 kms per tank around town running 340 rwkws and have seen 500+ open road. I don't exactly drive it all that economically either - (what point is horsepower if you don't use it?)

I just figured that $$L Jetro + 2xAFMs + tune > Djetro + tune + sell AFMs (its a big difference, trust me)

If you have any questions let me know - happy to answer them.

Edited by Blue32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...