Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys can anyone advise as to whether a standard PFC is sufficient for 300rwkw with standard internals or djetro required.?

What power figures require the djetro..?

I'd rather not get the djetro if not required as I've been told that it costs alot more to tune etc.

Its for a 32gtr.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194923-standard-pfc-or-djetro/
Share on other sites

For most setups both tune the same and one takes no longer than the other, the std PFC is good for whatever AFm you choose to use. i tend to use the d-jetro for radically cammed engines as it actually tunes up quicker... generally speaking the std PFC will offer better fuel economy.

For most setups both tune the same and one takes no longer than the other, the std PFC is good for whatever AFm you choose to use. i tend to use the d-jetro for radically cammed engines as it actually tunes up quicker... generally speaking the std PFC will offer better fuel economy.

Thanks alot for the info about tuning(I thought standard comes with a base tune, where djetro had to be tuned from scratch.?).

So it really then depends whether I can achieve 300rwkw with standard AFM's......is this possible....or do I need Z32's...??

Edited by PX29

well the Ljetro gets better economy as it runs MAFs instead of the twin map sensors on the Djetro version. they both come with base maps to start from. MAF sensors effectively measure air density/flow where as map sensors just measure pressure so under lots of condition the MAF sensor gives a finer reading.

they both cost the same to tune, but the big difference is the Djetro costs a lot more to install as you need to remove the plenum to fit the pressure feeds for the map sensors (unless you want to risk dropping swarf into the engine). the Ljetro of course is just plug in. BUT I would suggest that 300rwkw updraged MAF sensors is a good idea. either VG30s or Nismos etc. standard 26 Mafs will hit 5.115v at about 260rwkw. you can still tune a car with them to about 300rwkw or even more if you want, but it's much nicer to have a sensor that is still giving usable readings right to peak power/air flow.

well the Ljetro gets better economy as it runs MAFs instead of the twin map sensors on the Djetro version. they both come with base maps to start from. MAF sensors effectively measure air density/flow where as map sensors just measure pressure so under lots of condition the MAF sensor gives a finer reading.

they both cost the same to tune, but the big difference is the Djetro costs a lot more to install as you need to remove the plenum to fit the pressure feeds for the map sensors (unless you want to risk dropping swarf into the engine). the Ljetro of course is just plug in. BUT I would suggest that 300rwkw updraged MAF sensors is a good idea. either VG30s or Nismos etc. standard 26 Mafs will hit 5.115v at about 260rwkw. you can still tune a car with them to about 300rwkw or even more if you want, but it's much nicer to have a sensor that is still giving usable readings right to peak power/air flow.

Thanks for the response, very informative.

Bit confused with this Ljetro..?.....is this another name for the standard PFC...?,..cant seem to find it on the Nengun or Greenline webpages.

What would be the go then..... Standard, Djetro, Ljetro...?? Dont want to spend more than I need too..

Trying to determine which one is best suited for me.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
Thanks Beer Baron

Ljetro is just the normal PFC

Cool.

Been reading from the link below and there seems to be no real advantage going with the Djetro.

http://paulr33.sauvic.com.au/docs/powerfc-...erfc-faq.htm#61

Standard/Ljetro PCF seems to be the go-er at this stage. Anyone else want to enlighten me with their experiences or recommendations. I want to order a unit soon so I can start the 5-6week wait.

Cheers,

paulr33 suffers from MAPphobia :D

But in all seriousness, talk your tuner and discuss what he is most comfortable with.

I have seen Djetro installs on standard GT-Rs make power gains over the standard MAF version PFC without losing drivability.

Ive seen MAF make better power on GTRs with stock throttlebodys and found power with Djetros by finding ways of stopping the MAP pulse that they(And all other MAP ECUs)have,Mickos ex GTR is way down on power with its Djetro than it was with MAF PFC (400hp MAF 380hp Djetro) I spend much time Datalogging MAP signals and find good gains when we get a smooth input. 300KW is easy for MAF so you wont have to upgrade.

Sorry to hijack, but im looking at going d-jetro as well, and for me to sell the L and get a D is cheaper than buying AFMS for the L.

Ill need a new tune with the new engine package, and im going to make custom intake piping anyway whether if be for 80afm or no afm....

Whats best? Engine will be -5 equipped.

I run the D-jetro on my RB26 - I find I have no dramas at all, runs well, was easy to tune, comes with a base map etc. Common misconception is that you have to remove the inlet manifold. I can confirm this is NOT the case - I have my MAP sensors connected via a T piece to a vacuum feed on the inlet manifold and it runs fine. Talking with the guys at Willal racing, this is exactly what they do and haven't found any differences over running it this way vs drill and tapping fittings into the runners.

Benefits on the d jetro - removing the AFM removes inlet restrictions, also there is obviously no need to upgrade your AFM's once you max them out so that saves you quite a conserable amount of $$.

Economy - I am still obtaining 400 - 430 kms per tank around town running 340 rwkws and have seen 500+ open road. I don't exactly drive it all that economically either - (what point is horsepower if you don't use it?)

I just figured that $$L Jetro + 2xAFMs + tune > Djetro + tune + sell AFMs (its a big difference, trust me)

If you have any questions let me know - happy to answer them.

Edited by Blue32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
    • It says 300ZX, does that make it an Aus delivered car? Funny how back in the day I just couldn't care less about Z32's and these days I am just in love with them. Back when Nissan was into pushing the envelope. 🤣
    • Hi guys, just after some guidance with an R34 sunroof that has stopped working correctly. It still opens and closes perfectly fine, but it no longer tilts/vents up or down. As a result, the rear of the glass now sags a bit as it drops down slightly in order to retract into the roof, but now it can't pop upwards into a flush position. I’ve probed the pins on the back of the switch connector with a multimeter and it seems like both switches (for open/close and tilt/vent) still work correctly. Any ideas on what it could be, or where I should even start in terms of diagnosing? I'm sure someone's had this issue before but I haven't been able to find anything online relating to this specific issue, most of the issues are with the seals leaking or the motor failing entirely. Thanks in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...