Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice work Mitchy, u got abit to catch the gto yet :whistling: what mph were u doing in the leggy?

94mph

hopefully it wont be long before it has a bigger fmic, exhaust, intake, safc, ebc, etc...

the compliance cat is some cheap nasty item, and apparently a decent set of dump pipes really wakes the legnums up :)

might have to chuck a high-stall in there when i pull the box out... 2500rpm launch is piss weak! :)

I too did the manual Boost controller, thingy... but mine was a waste of time.

I bought the cheapie that is really raved about on these forums, only to find that it full boosted straight away, went to 1.07 bar, and the boost cut came on.

I backed it right off until the adjuster (bolt) was nearly out... No difference..

I took the spring & ball out.... no difference

I eventually realised that the orifice in the adapter was far too small, so I removed it.

I managed a 14.997 with the controller in, and the car cut out twice before the finish line.

I got a 15.01 without it.... so I was happy.

3rd gear surge with the controller was noticeably better.

My speedo was a mile out, reading 160kph at finish, when the car was only doing 141. It's got me wondering if the cut out was actually speedo related.

The main thing was I beat an XR8 Falcon and an R8 commodore!!

All in all it was a great night.

The M35, ran pretty good, but they are heavy.

Also it's worth mentioning that both the M35, (Karl's car), and the Commodore wagon (his mate Pete) that he raced against all night, were both set up with hand controls, due to both owners being paraplegics.

So hopefully that'll be a big slap in the face for all those lame arses that didn't even bother to show.

It seems that some people are more "able" than others! Even without full use of their limbs!

So a big well done to Karl and Pete..... showing up and having a go, is what Whoop Ass Wednesdays is all about.

It took them both a while to come to grips with the launches, but in the end Karl shaved 2 secs off his initial run. I believe that his best was a 15.4 sec.

Next time I want to have a run against him.....just to proove that the C34's still cut it.

A big thanks to Chuckie too, pit crew extraordinaire (to everyone).

We'll set up another in the New Year..... hopefully we'll get more people turn up.

whoops....

the only mod is a manual boost controller. :rofl:

stock exhaust, stock intake, even a crappy compliance spec cat and filter!

stock boost is about 8psi, and i had it set at 12psi, but it tapers off to about 10psi higher up (I need a EBC!)

the 'not much quicker' was referring to the aristo... i expected a 3L TT sedan to go more than 0.1s faster than a 2.5L TT wagon :)

the SS wagon was also a VY, so it was only the 5.7L LS1, i'm not sure what they are supposed to do, but i know the LS2 powered utes are supposed to do ~14 flat (my old man wants to try his against the legnum :P), so a LS1 wagon doing 15 sounds about right.

oh ok. thats still pretty good. obviously a lot less restrictions for the legnum - what i mean is the turbo has steel wheels and has no issues with higher boost, no issues with boost cut (R&R/whatever), and it seems the exhaust is still breathing well enough to handle 12psi just fine.

just a pity our stageas need a little bit of housekeeping (steel wheeled turbo, piggyback ecu) to reach the same level :spam:

Go the exhaust for sure. Do leggy's sound good with an exhaust? Only reason I ask is I've heard plenty of lancers and magnas that sound woeful (even though the owners seem to think they're sik!!). The legnum is streets ahead of the magna in terms of power and technology so I'd expect it to sound fairly good yeah?

:spam:

I feel guilty now.. as it was probably ME that raved about that boost controller

they can be a right Pr1ck to set up ..

what boost did you want it at? as I hear they are hard to regulate when you approach the 16-18psi rate.

No Sean, it wasn't just you. If you look up the original thread, there are 80 pages (I kid you not)..... I didn't read them all... maybe I should have...... oh well it was cheap.

The ebay seller gives it a really good rap...(that's where I got the link to the 80 page post).

I am only going to put up neutral feedback.... in a word the thing is ..... lets say, not good.

They sure don't suit Stagea S2's....(and therefore I doubt that they will suit any RB25 DET).

No Sean, it wasn't just you. If you look up the original thread, there are 80 pages (I kid you not)..... I didn't read them all... maybe I should have...... oh well it was cheap.

The ebay seller gives it a really good rap...(that's where I got the link to the 80 page post).

I am only going to put up neutral feedback.... in a word the thing is ..... lets say, not good.

They sure don't suit Stagea S2's....(and therefore I doubt that they will suit any RB25 DET).

Please dont assume that just because your setup isn't how you like that it is a problem with the product. The unit you have may be faulty, or not set up correctly...

OR, given that when you wound it all the way out it still boosted above 5psi, maybe you have an issue with your wastegate actuator or something. With no boost controller connected up, you shouldn't be able to get above 5psi. The way the stock controller works is by bleeding off some pressure in order to make it run 7psi (after 4500rpm). The way the turbotech (i assume thats what you have) controller works, is to have a spring holding a ball bearing in the way of pressure line so that when the pressure builds enough to dislodge the ball bearing, the wastegate actuator then sees full pressure immediately, opens the wastegate, and thereby ensures that boost doesn't build further.

The reason the turbotech controller received such good feedback is because people USED it and it worked for them. Myself included. I've been running this brand controller for over 6 months now and it works without a hitch. Its only set to around 10psi but I've checked it with my guage and it will boost quickly up to 10psi and then stop there and it remains constant right through to the redline. If you had a controller that was that accurate you'd rave about it too.

Its unfortunate that you haven't had the same luck, but I have an S2 stagea and this controller works GREAT on my car.

Is there a possibility that either controller was not set up correctly or that there may be another issue with your boost? Might be worth checking that out. In any case, a GOOD electronic boost controller will give you more flexibility anyway and will work best. Hope you get it sorted :P

Edited by pixel8r
oh ok. thats still pretty good. obviously a lot less restrictions for the legnum - what i mean is the turbo has steel wheels and has no issues with higher boost, no issues with boost cut (R&R/whatever), and it seems the exhaust is still breathing well enough to handle 12psi just fine.

just a pity our stageas need a little bit of housekeeping (steel wheeled turbo, piggyback ecu) to reach the same level :(

Go the exhaust for sure. Do leggy's sound good with an exhaust? Only reason I ask is I've heard plenty of lancers and magnas that sound woeful (even though the owners seem to think they're sik!!). The legnum is streets ahead of the magna in terms of power and technology so I'd expect it to sound fairly good yeah?

:D

the main reason i think it goes so well is the low down torque, it feels like a baby V8 rather than a twin turbo 6.

when i first drove the car i felt disappointed by the acceleration, until i looked at the speedo and realised i was doing 120 when i thought i was going 80. :banana:

while the steel wheel turbo's can take a fair bit of boost (up to ~18psi) they are only tiny TD03's, so they run out of puff quickly, and the factory boost cut is around 13-14psi, so i was trying to stay clear of that.

exhaust wise i'm not sure what they sound like actually.. the engine noise sounds very grumbly though, so the exhaust is hopefully the same. :)

also about the boost controller, i had one in my 33 holding 13psi perfectly.

spiking to 1 bar sounds like you installed it backwards...

the main reason i think it goes so well is the low down torque, it feels like a baby V8 rather than a twin turbo 6.

when i first drove the car i felt disappointed by the acceleration, until i looked at the speedo and realised i was doing 120 when i thought i was going 80. :banana:

while the steel wheel turbo's can take a fair bit of boost (up to ~18psi) they are only tiny TD03's, so they run out of puff quickly, and the factory boost cut is around 13-14psi, so i was trying to stay clear of that.

exhaust wise i'm not sure what they sound like actually.. the engine noise sounds very grumbly though, so the exhaust is hopefully the same. :(

also about the boost controller, i had one in my 33 holding 13psi perfectly.

spiking to 1 bar sounds like you installed it backwards...

The reason I was interested is because my brother-in-law has been drooling over legnums for quite some time now (currently has a magna - definitely not my cup of tea). I've seen a couple in caryards here, but I've only seen 1 driving on the road, black with bodykit and bigger rims.

It had what you might call a certain "presence" about it and definitely got a lot of attention from myself, but I've gotta admit it looked a bit odd. Dont get me wrong, a lot of people say the same about stageas (and fair enough). I dont dislike them either, and they're a damn good wagon, especially the interior and especially on paper. :D

also just a quick note about the turbotech controller (and any aftermarket boost controller), make sure the stock solenoid is actually closed off, ie. plug the ends of the hoses with something, either before or after the solenoid - doesn't matter. Basically the standard setup should all be disconnected and the turbotech should only have one hose going to the actuator and one to the rear/middle of the turbo. Thats all. All other boost lines should be closed off.

Also check that the controller isn't installed backwards, as mitchy suggested. You should have received a diagram with it that tells you which way round it should go. When you get it it should be preset to about 8psi. Mine was. If you wind it out further it should go down a little, but its impossible to go below 5psi just with the controller. Winding it in tighter will result in more boost, but be aware that a 1/4 turn can raise boost by 1-2psi, possibly more as the boost goes up....ie. once it starts getting tighter, the boost will raise by more and more with each 1/4 turn so be very careful and do it in very small increments, maybe 1/4 or 1/8 turn each time between tests...

Once set, tighten the lock nut thingy against the controller so that it wont move, preferrably tighter than just finger-tight. :banana:

If that still doesn't work, its possible the ball bearing and spring have been dislodged - this can apparently happen if you wind it out too far. They can be reseated fairly easily so I'm told.

No Sean, it wasn't just you. If you look up the original thread, there are 80 pages (I kid you not)..... I didn't read them all... maybe I should have...... oh well it was cheap.

The ebay seller gives it a really good rap...(that's where I got the link to the 80 page post).

I am only going to put up neutral feedback.... in a word the thing is ..... lets say, not good.

They sure don't suit Stagea S2's....(and therefore I doubt that they will suit any RB25 DET).

The Boost controller in question works fine as i used it in my old 33 for over 2years no problem whatsoever. Even the tuner said it held boost rather nicely all the way through the rev range when it was on the dyno. Have a look at your setup cause the controller is very basic ant not really proned to failure. The guy has sold lots of these and if they were sh*t then it would be 80 pages of complaints.....

OK, obviously this needs clearing up.....

post-30601-1198279352_thumb.jpg

The boost controller isn't a Turbotech.

It's a JRD.

It is made up of a very standard Tee-piece, and two unions for the hoses, a ball bearing, a spring , bolt & lock-nut.

on initial install (incidentally done at a tuning centre), I knew that it was high boosting as soon as I left.

I got home (5 mins away) and started backing off the bolt. After a few runs around the block I had the bolt right out to the last threads. It was still about the same. I didn't have time to play with it further, and decided to do it at the track.

I did 2 or 3 runs at the drag strip (about 1 hour after the install). It was max boosting & cutting. I removed the ball and spring...... so anyone at this point would expect the car to return to standard boost mode.

No, it was still boosting..... after looking at the holes in the unions, I found that they are about 2mm in dia, the Factory pipes are about 4-5mm. That is one big restriction on its own. Obviously far too much for my S2.

The hoses were a loose fit and required tightening with hose clamps a fair way. (this should have warned us).

So as I see it the controller, controls nothing. It is poorly researched and needs a larger inlet and outlet hole.

I am not disputing that the idea is solid but it sure didn't work on mine.

I may look at either replacement, or modifying it. But one thing is very clear to me and that it that the flow needs to be unrestricted initally, so that it can be restricted gradually and thereby giving the control that the item claims to be able to do. This item controls nothing, it is a restrictor and that is all.

I have to written to the seller. I'll post up the resolution.

Edited by Appealing
OK, obviously this needs clearing up.....

post-30601-1198279352_thumb.jpg

The boost controller isn't a Turbotech.

It's a JRD.

It is made up of a very standard Tee-piece, and two unions for the hoses, a ball bearing, a spring , bolt & lock-nut.

on initial install (incidentally done at a tuning centre), I knew that it was high boosting as soon as I left.

I got home (5 mins away) and started backing off the bolt. After a few runs around the block I had the bolt right out to the last threads. It was still about the same. I didn't have time to play with it further, and decided to do it at the track.

I did 2 or 3 runs at the drag strip (about 1 hour after the install). It was max boosting & cutting. I removed the ball and spring...... so anyone at this point would expect the car to return to standard boost mode.

No, it was still boosting..... after looking at the holes in the unions, I found that they are about 2mm in dia, the Factory pipes are about 4-5mm. That is one big restriction on its own. Obviously far too much for my S2.

The hoses were a loose fit and required tightening with hose clamps a fair way. (this should have warned us).

So as I see it the controller, controls nothing. It is poorly researched and needs a larger inlet and outlet hole.

I am not disputing that the idea is solid but it sure didn't work on mine.

I may look at either replacement, or modifying it. But one thing is very clear to me and that it that the flow needs to be unrestricted initally, so that it can be restricted gradually and thereby giving the control that the item claims to be able to do. This item controls nothing, it is a restrictor and that is all.

I have to written to the seller. I'll post up the resolution.

Sorry to hear that. And I can feel your frustration too because I too bought one of these JRD ones first, before I heard about the turbotech ones.

In my case I was lucky in that it seemed to work. It would spike to 12psi but would then drop instantly back to 10psi and then fade off to 9psi by the time it reached the redline :banana: And to make things worse, it was quite unpredictable, ie. it didn't give the same boost response between gearchanges or even on different days...it just wasn't reliable enough for day-to-day driving! Without something to compare it with however, I didn't pick this up until after I switched to the turbotech ;)

If you're wanting an IEBC anyway, then that will be your best option in the long run due to better tuning capabilities and in-cabin switching of boost on-the-fly.

But if you're willing to try the turbotech you'll (hopefully) be impressed by how well it performs. There is a thread on here ("$22 boost controller" or something like that in the subject) where many people have had excellent results from it, and for the price it cant be beat. There is a member on here who sells them but I'm not sure if he still goes on SAU...I bought mine from ebay as he sells them on ebay primarily.

The newer ones have a tiny hole drilled in the back of them which apparently improves boost response between gearchanges and it seemed to work for me :)

When I changed from the JRD to the turbotech I noticed an immediate improvement, not just in holding boost better, but it also boosted up quicker and made the car noticeably more responsive in lower revs.

I would never recommend the JRD to anyone based on my experience with it, but I would 100% recommend the turbotech. As I said before, I've been using it for ~6 months now and its been flawless. Holds boost around 10-11 psi all the way to redline :) I'd need to upgrade my fuel pump to run higher than that so this is the only reason for the low boost at the moment :)

Some pics that Chuckie took on the night....

post-30601-1198330574_thumb.jpg post-30601-1198330645_thumb.jpg

post-30601-1198331043_thumb.jpg post-30601-1198331106_thumb.jpg

Well didn't beat him.

Once I had worked out how better to get off the line things went a little better for me. But on standard boost the stag was a bit difficult to get it off the line quickly. If I could get it to staging first get time to build boost it would do a 15 flat or even go high 14's with a more experienced driver. Pete and myself were neck and neck till the stag changed to 3, wear Pete would surge a little in front. Interesting fact though Pete was always just that little bit quicker going through all the markers except the last one. Top speed at the end 146km/h for the stag and same for the comm, go figure?Best time stag 15.4 best time comm 14.8.The larger wheels should have made no difference as they have very close to the same rolling diameter to standard. Standard is 18" 225/55 Whats on there is 20" 225/35. Only a poofteenth in it and not worth mentioning. I tried many ways of getting up the track quickly. Doing a manual shift auto shift short shift and just reving the shit out of it before changing. The best way for me was to not quite hit the floor with the gas pedal and let it do its own thing in the gear changing department.As I said before being my first time to drive a car down the strip. I recon a better driver would get a 15 flat easily and possibly sneak it into the high 14's.But in my humble opinion "I NEED MORE BOOST"I will take it back to the track I hope before the track closes for winter, if I can manage to get some tuning done. Maybe bigger turbo injectors piggyback and better get some info on the box, see what can be done there to make it handle a few extra ponies.When the car is finished ( in the next 15 years or so LOL ) I would like 300 - 350kw at the wheels.I know I need to talk to lots of professionals get lots of opinions to achieve the best way of doing this. But not in a hurry, plenty of time to do it.That and a shot of Nos it might take a couple of seconds off that time. :)

OK, obviously this needs clearing up.....

post-30601-1198279352_thumb.jpg

The boost controller isn't a Turbotech.

It's a JRD.

It is made up of a very standard Tee-piece, and two unions for the hoses, a ball bearing, a spring , bolt & lock-nut.

on initial install (incidentally done at a tuning centre), I knew that it was high boosting as soon as I left.

I got home (5 mins away) and started backing off the bolt. After a few runs around the block I had the bolt right out to the last threads. It was still about the same. I didn't have time to play with it further, and decided to do it at the track.

I did 2 or 3 runs at the drag strip (about 1 hour after the install). It was max boosting & cutting. I removed the ball and spring...... so anyone at this point would expect the car to return to standard boost mode.

No, it was still boosting..... after looking at the holes in the unions, I found that they are about 2mm in dia, the Factory pipes are about 4-5mm. That is one big restriction on its own. Obviously far too much for my S2.

The hoses were a loose fit and required tightening with hose clamps a fair way. (this should have warned us).

So as I see it the controller, controls nothing. It is poorly researched and needs a larger inlet and outlet hole.

I am not disputing that the idea is solid but it sure didn't work on mine.

I may look at either replacement, or modifying it. But one thing is very clear to me and that it that the flow needs to be unrestricted initally, so that it can be restricted gradually and thereby giving the control that the item claims to be able to do. This item controls nothing, it is a restrictor and that is all.

I have to written to the seller. I'll post up the resolution.

Mine arived on the 24/12/07 A little late for the drags but I have it now. Not sure how to fit it up to nm35. Might make a mess of it so will wait and take it in to someone who knows a lot more than I.

Well didn't beat him.

Once I had worked out how better to get off the line things went a little better for me. But on standard boost the stag was a bit difficult to get it off the line quickly. If I could get it to staging first get time to build boost it would do a 15 flat or even go high 14's with a more experienced driver. Pete and myself were neck and neck till the stag changed to 3, wear Pete would surge a little in front. Interesting fact though Pete was always just that little bit quicker going through all the markers except the last one. Top speed at the end 146km/h for the stag and same for the comm, go figure?Best time stag 15.4 best time comm 14.8.The larger wheels should have made no difference as they have very close to the same rolling diameter to standard. Standard is 18" 225/55 Whats on there is 20" 225/35. Only a poofteenth in it and not worth mentioning. I tried many ways of getting up the track quickly. Doing a manual shift auto shift short shift and just reving the shit out of it before changing. The best way for me was to not quite hit the floor with the gas pedal and let it do its own thing in the gear changing department.As I said before being my first time to drive a car down the strip. I recon a better driver would get a 15 flat easily and possibly sneak it into the high 14's.But in my humble opinion "I NEED MORE BOOST"I will take it back to the track I hope before the track closes for winter, if I can manage to get some tuning done. Maybe bigger turbo injectors piggyback and better get some info on the box, see what can be done there to make it handle a few extra ponies.When the car is finished ( in the next 15 years or so LOL ) I would like 300 - 350kw at the wheels.I know I need to talk to lots of professionals get lots of opinions to achieve the best way of doing this. But not in a hurry, plenty of time to do it.That and a shot of Nos it might take a couple of seconds off that time. :thumbsup:

Cmon girls & boys dont get down coz a slurrydore

beat one stag lets us all get down & show them how

its done !

Cmon girls & boys dont get down coz a slurrydore

beat one stag lets us all get down & show them how

its done !

3 WEEK`S OF POST`S WITH THE TIME,DAY & VENUE,AND HOW SHOWED UP JOHN,BATMAN&ROBIN,SORRY DID I MISS ANY BODY :down::) ???,YES MYGOOD SELF :( ,IF KARL HAS THE TIME TO GET OFF FORM WORK ?????? THEN MAY BE HE WILL PUT A POST UP & LET`S HOPE WE HAVE SOME :):D:D BODY COME DOWN,TO HAVE A LAUGH&JOKE WOULD BE GREAT TO SEE SOME OF YOU ROCK UP ???????.SO COME ON KARL GIVE THE BOSS :) & GET IT HAPPENING WAGON OFF TAKE TWO,cheer`s chuckie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...