Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I was wondering for a stock R33 GTST what is the 'average' (if there is such a thing) rear wheel kilowatts.

From the flywheel it is around 185kW?

I read in a performance mag that rwkW is around 120-135. WTF? Is there that much kW lost? That would be pretty inefficient then.

Also, what effect would 3" dump back zorst do to that rwkW? How much on 'average' increase in kW would you expect?

Cheers

kW

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/
Share on other sites

For a start i dont know if u got it but i would get a filter ,either pod or in box k&n.A dyno will help your car run its optimum for the set up u have .Some dyno places recon they can get another 10=15psi just by dyno tune ..With the standard ecu there isnt tooo much to change.I would get it dyno to give u a starting figure before any mods.Also my r33 ran better at 10psi than it does on 12 psi,so things like this u can set up on a dyno.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-413818
Share on other sites

Hi guys, we have had over 20 standard R33 GTST's on the dyno, with kilometres from 10,000 top 130,000. The power output hardly varies in Shootout mode with temperature and humidity compensation loaded. The only time we see low numbers we find poor compression or other problems, fuel pumps, fuel regs, plugs etc. If it leaks down less than 25% and the support stuff is in good condition, they always make 120 to 130 rwkw.

We have found the same with RB20DET's, they are very consistent and always make 105 to 110 rwkw. We have had a couple with close to 200,000 kilometres on them and they test fine. Maintenance (regular oil and filter changes etc) seems to be far more important than age or kilometres travelled.

So to answer king_kw13 question, 50 to 60 kw losses through the drive train are very common.

As the REV said, they do vary, but we generally find that ones down on power have a support system problem or are badly tuned. The engine internals are generally pretty good and they come up well once we fix whatever the problem is.

We do find really bad ones, but they are rare. We had a 120,000k one in a couple of months ago that I removed the cam covers off and found great lumps of "vegemite" everywhere. Sent the gunk off to a chemist mate at Castrol and he reckons it had never had an oil change in its life, it was still the original running in oil.

Hope that adds to the discussion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-415952
Share on other sites

its all done on one dyno in one wharehouse and run by someone who sets it up every run for the correct variables to an ambient temp of 24degrees celcius... it makes for a good comparison at minimum and a good general idea, even for anyone who wants to question its morals

S of S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-416918
Share on other sites

when my car was dyno just after getting it off the ship it pulled 97kw@rear wheels, that was bog stock standard same way it left the dealership when brand new. After a good cat back exhaust and a small amount of timing it went to 115kw@rear wheels. I've used the same dyno pretty much each time since then. After fitting the front mount, boost controller and HKS pod it made 179kw@rear wheels (boost set to 12psi) and then 183kw@rear wheels after fitting the dump+front pipe. I would say if I fit an aftermarket ecu next I'd be able to just get over 200kw. But the odd thing is the dyno figure my car gave when it first got here, I'm not sure what boost it was running back then (no decent boost gauge and didnt ask the dyno guys if they measured it), anyway the power levels seem on parr with the other guys in WA with simular mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-417034
Share on other sites

a split dump turbo back exhaust, as opposed to a single turbo back exhaust, is good for almost as much power as what you gain from a cat back. But a tuboback and catback exhaust is only as good as the cat itself. A full split dump turbo back, hi-flow cat and cat-back should be worth about 25-30rwkw.

S of S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-417122
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Sydneykid

a split dump turbo back exhaust, as opposed to a single turbo back exhaust, is good for almost as much power as what you gain from a cat back. But a tuboback and catback exhaust is only as good as the cat itself. A full split dump turbo back, hi-flow cat and cat-back should be worth about 25-30rwkw.  

S of S

Split dump pipe is a superfluous modification, a well made one peice is just as good and often cheaper on the stock turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-417423
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to update. I ended up removing it and found out that it's dead. The car seems to run better than it did, although I haven't driven it hard yet. Literally just a flow restriction.
    • Sounds like the rack seals blew.
    • ^ This is all good advice. I can imagine that there's some passive components in the HVAC controller that run that PWM output that could die, or suffer bad solder joints. It can be worth opening it up, taking a schmooze around looking for swollen electro caps, evidence of liquid escape anywhere, tracks that have been hot, lifted, cracked, etc. A DMM might not be suitable for seeing if the PWM output is pulsing. Might be too fast and too low voltage for a DMM to keep up. An analogue voltmeter might give a better hope. I use a handheld oscilloscope (<$100 from Aliexpress if you want something cheap). A DMM might see the voltage across the motor flicker. Otherwise, as above. If you can successfully see PWM action, then the control side should be good. If you can't see it with what you have, you might need to step up the instrumentation used, as above. Beyond that, and dbm7's advice on testing the motor directly, you're down to looking for broken wires, corroded connector pins, etc.
    • So Thanks for the comments etc. To follow up on this, we went down the path of fitting a divider down the middle of the external pipe that was added to the exhaust manifold and the divider went from very close to the external wastegate all the way up to the "V" part where the pipes from each side of the manifold joined. After this modification it was finally in a position to do the dyno-tune with some degree of success. Top end power was down about 10kw (250rwkw down to 240rwkw) I believe from previous but it seems to be more responsive lower down and at least it is now driveable and fun and back on the road to be enjoyed. Apparently the timing couldn't be run the same as it was running into knock and boost was down about 1psi. For all we know this could have been from the fuel being a bit older, or perhaps some slight complication from the new head gasket as we didn't have compression figures from before that mod to compare. I'm no mechanic and this is second hand info but I just wanted to follow-up to those that commented or read the original post with interest. After so many months of stuffing around this is a big win. The interesting part was most of the info around this was gained from information around Barra motors and not GTR as the manifold setup on the Barra with single turbo was more similar.  Thanks for those that helped with info. Regards Rob 
    • G'day ... first up, I very much doubt that's a resistor network (as used also for this job), but the part# looks right. The description of 'power module assembly' looks to be nissanese for 'PWM driven, ground switched, DC motor speed controller'.... the circuit in the schematic kinda infers that's the case... ...with the transistor symbol appearing in the unit described here as 'Fan Control Amp(lifier)'....being driven by pin20 on the HVAC unit,  and a feedback signal on pin19 from the motor negative terminal for some reason (might be motor fault detection, maybe they detect commutator switching to determine motor revs as well, I dunno)... but if they are  counting commutator spikes, a bad segment (or really worn brushes) will throw a spanner in the works... The motor itself will as said be brushed DC with segmented commutator, rated at 12VDC nominally ~ now-a-days I just unplug them, determine the positive wire, and hook them up to a variable power supply and find out how much current they draw, if they work etc etc ...you can also check for bad segments...ie; set the power supply up to feed 1volt @ 2amp max, then watch the wattage count as you slowly rotate the fan blower motor through a complete revolution ; any bad/dead segments will be clearly evident...some folks would just say determine the positive wire, and feed it battery voltage, and if fan spin, you've got a win...<grin>... well, at least that infers it should do something when plugged back in, and the HVAC unit commands it to run... and if it doesn't, you suspect the module, but you should check the PWM signal on pin20 is actually present, and if it is, blame the module ...  
×
×
  • Create New...