Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how much louder are we talking.?

i had my exhaust tested, 84db, nice and quiet, but i'm about to install a high flow. i always knew it would make things louder, would an increase of 7 psi make a huge difference in noise?

i am installing a gt30r sitting on a custom made high mount with 44mm turbosmart external wastegate and with a 3/or 3.5 " wide mouth dump

im sure the level of noise will increase, but would it be worth while upgrading my 3" jasma exhaust? or power difference from another exhaust wouldnt be noticable?

im pretty sure its the standard exhaust, but i have had the middle muffler removed.

The stock exhaust system is tiny, does it have twin pipes at the end? I would get a new one, go stainless steel 3" with 2 mufflers. Just be aware of the noise issue that will result with the bigger turbo, more flow = more noise.

bigger turbo= more flow= more noise? makes sense.

is there a possibility of upgrading the turbo and still having a quite car at low rev and an insane one at high rpm range? i too would enjoy to stay under the radar but would love to have the rb scream when i wanted it.

thanks in advance

bugger, haha i'll see what happens when i get my car back from the shop.

had a hiflow on it previously and was fairly quiet. Was actually considering then to get a new exhaust with less turns in the pipes.

but looking at what you have said i might wait and see what noise level i am on.

mine was 93-4, now is over a hundred again still with the peII. i want to put the old exhaust on again and see lol it used to be 100+ on the stock turbo.

i guess turbo choiuce is a bit different to you guys tho. right now car idles like open pipes with the peII

get one of those valves for the exhaust where you can turn it from inside the car to cut sound (and obviously flow/power) then open it right up for full sound and power.

Do you know the name of it? who makes them, HKS? anyone heard of such a valve?

you can get them from autobarn etc up here in syd quite easily. that "drift" brand make them and are probably the cheapest. also hks etc have similar offerings. they are called exhaust control valves (ECV) or exhaust valve controllers (EVC) by most manufacturer's., and are basically a throttle body for your exhaustdrift ones are around 170 bucks

www.nengun.com

I got my apexi one off nengun. They are quite good. Factor in a few hundred install. Had to remove my whole exhuast (one piece dump to cannon), cut in half, take a 150mm piece out. Weld on flanges to the exhuast and then flanges to the evc and then bolt back in.

I was hoping quiter on idle but make no difference. But if u tap accelerator with it shut it sounds like a camry. I have straight through 3" with just a cannon, and it gets very quiet when closed (rb20det with highflow)

what about that,,, im unsure of the brand might be xforce.

it comes with an electronic solenoid built in that diverts air, baffleing it making it quieter.

it was tested on ignition dvd. and sounded nice and quiet. then when u press the button, it unleashes hell

Edited by r33cruiser

Does the TRUST PE2 exhaust have 2 mufflers?

as in one out the back and another between that and the cat?

if not, get an exhaust place to fit a 3 inch off centre muffler in the middle somewhere..

that'll shut the thing up.

EDIT - not I said muffler.. not a resonator.

they don't do shit.

Edited by GTST

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...