Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Does the phrase half cut mongrel enter anyone elses mind. I have no idea why people would basterdise a good car by adding a heap of fibreglass and bog to it. I hate any of those half this half that cars except the r34 front on a stagea as it seems to be the only conversion with any merrit just my opnion .

just my opnion

exactly...

I was thinking of doing this conversion myself until xmas time and rego sent me broke, but we'll see in the new year...

Its not as expensive (apparently) as youd think, ive had a word with the guys at Uras who've done a few of these conversions, and (once again, apparently) theres no real crazy modifications needed.

All that is needed for this to work is:

R33/34 conversion fenders - $300-400 roughly

R34 headlights - $5-600 plus

R34 bonnet - around $2-300 or go aftermarket which is around $500

R34 front bar - $1-200 or once again aftermarket $3-400

Budget around $2000 which should be enough. And if you can source the front panels which are the same colour as your car you are laughing!

Those conversion fenders are popping up all over the place now, so they are not that hard to come by. The only thing thats hard to find ive found is the R34 headlights, and if you can source them they are generally quite expensive...

If your going to do it, good luck and take many a picture!!!

:banana:

Edited by Musky
people do this because apart from the front nose all r34 look shit house. the rear is 10 metres off the ground and porpoise like a bitch. they are big fat bricks with no incling of aerodynamics.

atleast here u still have the nice flowing lines of a r33 with the sharp bulbous nose of the 34.

best of both worlds

u see how it looks low and sharp. where as if he bought a 34 is would look shit

u r a f**king idiot if u think that an r33 has better aerodynamics then an r34 then ur just a retard!!!!!!!

Saw something weird as today - a s15 body with a R34 head but with WRX doors...pretty hot....

Was this in the West again? :devil: That's some weird conversion.

u r a f**king idiot if u think that an r33 has better aerodynamics then an r34 then ur just a retard!!!!!!!

Come on now... No need for that. We all know R32 has the best aerodynamics. :blink:

u r a f**king idiot if u think that an r33 has better aerodynamics then an r34 then ur just a retard!!!!!!!

hhhmmmm. yea that explains why r34's have a severe porpoising problem (!)

r33's squat lower and are far more stable.

im just saying this from seeing hill climbs, talking to drivers

and driving an r33 and an r34.

i think the r33 has best handling and stability.

i have only had a short squirt in a r32 gtst, so i cant really comment on a r32, all i can say is if u have a r32 gtst your gay. soo guttless

Edited by r33cruiser
hhhmmmm. yea that explains why r34's have a severe porpoising problem (!)

r33's squat lower and are far more stable.

im just saying this from seeing hill climbs, talking to drivers

and driving an r33 and an r34.

i think the r33 has best handling and stability.

i have only had a short squirt in a r32 gtst, so i cant really comment on a r32, all i can say is if u have a r32 gtst your gay. soo guttless

Cant really comment on drivability... but I think R33 looks much tougher.

hhhmmmm. yea that explains why r34's have a severe porpoising problem (!)

r33's squat lower and are far more stable.

im just saying this from seeing hill climbs, talking to drivers

and driving an r33 and an r34.

i think the r33 has best handling and stability.

i have only had a short squirt in a r32 gtst, so i cant really comment on a r32, all i can say is if u have a r32 gtst your gay. soo guttless

"r33's squat lower and are far more stable.

im just saying this from seeing hill climbs, talking to drivers"

:D:devil:

sorry but i can't find the smiley face with the WTF sign.

people do this because apart from the front nose all r34 look shit house. the rear is 10 metres off the ground and porpoise like a bitch. they are big fat bricks with no incling of aerodynamics.

:laughing-smiley-014: :laughing-smiley-014:

You bring a smile to my face at the end of a shitty day .

Someone find me the WTF sign please LOL!

:laughing-smiley-014: :laughing-smiley-014:

You bring a smile to my face at the end of a shitty day .

Someone find me the WTF sign please LOL!

Yeah, good to see that you're laughing... :(

But sorry to say, a R33 GTR does look tougher than the R34.... but then the R35 owns all... totally up to the eye of the beholder. :P

I have to agree with the R34 guys, the 34 looks better. The back end is pretty tall, noticed on a SAU cruise, but I'd still love one. That said, I think the R33/4 hybrid looks awesome, and is something different at least. Would like to see pics of one without the wide guards though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...