Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys need help with insurance, need to know who you with how much what ur details are and car insured with

my friends got a

93

Mitsubishi gto

auto

4wd

straight 6

3lts engine

and Shannon's didn't insure his car and also just car quoted him 1800 thats cheapest he has got need to know whats good for him and everyone else, i also searched and nothin came up with insurance on SAU search engine lol

thanks in advance :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/198507-need-help-for-iinsurance/
Share on other sites

A GTO with a "straight 6" :P

What are your friends details:

- Driving history - Fines, suspensions, etc?

- Age?

- Insurance history?

- Is car garaged?

- Modified?

- Turbo?

I am paying $1000/yr for a highly modified R33 gtst, garaged, limited use, i am 30yrs old, never made a claim, never had any type of infringement. Insured through Shannons.

$1800 doesn't sounds too bad for they type of car.

As mentioned, history plays a big part of who will insure you and what for. I'm in the process of changing insurance companies, as my current have changed their underwriting and can't cover my 33. Google insurance, and do some online quotes and compare them all, or see a BROKER . So far the quotes range from $1000ish to $1400ish for me.

Im paying $1600 p/a for an R33 gtst. Male driver under 25 (for another 7 months luckily), garaged car, one claim (about $3k damage). It was about $1400 until the claim then it jumped up.

Thats with Just cars.

Import sports cars will fetch a high price regardless. If youre young as well, expect to pay big $$$

oh ok yea thanks for the feedback, i must of didn't search properly sorry, yea my friend is under 25 and this is his first car although he had only had 1 ride off which he was 18 since then he has had no fines and his car not even modified at all, fully stock. Shannon said to him that they don't insure his type of car they only insure a different type of model to his GTO, i will have a look at those links also and get more info but i appreciate more responses from everyone

Thanks again

:banana:

he was going to put his car under his dads name and they happen to say that, i knew that from start because i had ago and now i am going to put it under my dads name for my car, but as for my friend they said they don't insure that type of car even under his dads name which i found weird also :S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...