Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Because heat soak from engine bay heat causes the engine to lose power

with a podfilter.

There's a dyno chart on the internet somewhere (I think was done in Australia)

showing the differences with bonnet up, down and with a coldairbox, etc.

Engine gains 8 rwkw with bonnet up but when bonnet is down, engine power

drops due to heat soak (hot air from radiator, etc).

Some say this only happens when car is stationary like on a dyno. When a

car is moving, alot of air is entering engine bay.The result is the engine bay

cools down and water temps drop, etc. Basically a dyno fan is not producing

enough air to properly simulate real world driving conditions.

I guess can understand why ECU tuners take cars for a drive after dyno

tune, so to check that the tune is correct for real world driving conditions.

Another interesting thing I have found is water can enter between bonnet,

fender and wet the podfilter (enter the intake piping, engine). With a cold

air box fed by a intake pipe, this can be reduced.

I can see why they put a airfilter in a airbox at factory, because it keeps

the incoming air away from engine bay heat and water cannot enter

intake piping, engine.

Edited by SKYPER
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i'd be getting the intercooler from the reasons limpus said and also if u get the ecu u'll have to get it tuned b4 the fmic and after again i take it, soo just a waste of money.. and i do think the fmic makes the car a little laggier but it picks up more top end imo..

Adding a intercooler is going to lean out the A/F (Air/Fuel) ratio

which creates more heat in the cylinders on top of the intake,

exhaust mods that have already leaned out the A/F ratio and

created more heat.

Basically raising the boost level with intake, exhaust, intercooler,

leans out the A/F ratio and is why a engine produces more power.

The extra heat inside the cylinders is then transfered to the

water running through the engine block and oil that lubricates

the engine. Basically water and oil temps are going to rise.

This is not good if your cars engine shares water and

oil with turbo.

With ECU your adjusting how much fuel is injected thus

can help to stop the engine leaning out too much with

intake and exhaust mods. Basically helps to keep

cylinder temps under control.

Edited by SKYPER
Adding an intercooler is going to lean out the A/F (Air/Fuel) ratio

which creates more heat in the cylinder on top of the intake and

exhaust mods that have already leaned out the A/F ratio.

Basically raising the boost level with intake, exhaust, intercooler,

leans out the A/F ratio and is why a engine produces more power.

dude are u serious?

stock ecu+mods= rich as a mother.

im pushing constant 11's A/F.

i hit R&R at 10psi

Edited by r33cruiser
Can i ask why people are anti POD filter? I have the HKS Spoung Air Filter with no Box... why would that be a bad thing?

Because they dont offer a performance gain at all.

Infact they can make the car slower

Adding an intercooler is going to lean out the A/F (Air/Fuel) ratio

which creates more heat in the cylinders on top of the intake,

exhaust mods that have already leaned out the A/F ratio and

created more heat.

Basically raising the boost level with intake, exhaust, intercooler,

leans out the A/F ratio and is why a engine produces more power.

The extra heat inside the cylinders is then transfered to the

water running through the engine block and oil that lubricates

the engine. Basically water and oil temps are going to rise.

Errrrrm....yeah right...as if a fmic is going to lean the AFRs out too much...

When i got my car 2 years ago it already came with a catback...and the i actually went fmic before any other mods solely because its more of a support/safety mod before i went to any power mods...especially with the blistering summer temps now i think its a good idea...

This is a good idea and one reason why I was considering getting a FMIC, but then you have to remember that it would block some flow to the radiator = higher water temps, which is never a good thing in the middle of summer. Personally I'd just go the r34 cooler if you just want to keep the intake temps lower during the summer heat.

i thought if u wanted to run 11-12psi on the standard turbo you would need to upgrade the intercooler anyway?

having said that you'd prob want an ecu @ this boost level.

so fmic+ecu = ftw

If at 100% throttle constantly like on a racetrack, then yes you

need a front mount intercooler. Also a steel wheel turbo upgrade.

On the road, supposedly can get away with 20 second burst's with

stock sidemount intercooler on a R33. A sightly larger R34GTT

sidemount intercooler that's installed in a R32 GTS -T is said

to be ok for couple of laps on a racetrack.

I read that 13.5psi is the max boost for R32 intercooler. Isn't

a coincidence that max boost on the stock R32, R33 boost gauge

translates to roughly the same 13.5psi?? R34 GTT stock boost

gauge roughly translates to around 14psi.

Stock R32 GTS-T intercooler has been proven to be capable of around

211.3rwkw on a dyno at I think was 9.33psi with a RB25DET conversion

in a R32 GTS-T.

Here's the dynochart -

http://img512.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc0725xw5.jpg

Also add a bigger fuelpump to the ECU, intercooler upgrades.

Edited by SKYPER

FMIC is there to stop detonation when running more psi + add more cooler air then a stock unit can cool

but a intercooler does add more power by it self....... compared to not running one at all, all those jap turbo cars that dont run intercoolers, kei cars, dihastu charade etc. air coming in would be warmer then a intercooled engine, warmer air means theres less air getting to the engine, as warm air expands, then when the air is colder.

thus more air = more power

Geez Dan_J, my head is starting to hurt.

The above statement is completly wrong. Your proof is Kei cars and Dihastu's are slow (because they don't have intercoolers)?!?! It might also have to do with the fact that the are 3 bangers with turbos about the size of your fist that run .4 bar and aren't made for performance.

I think you guys are confusing whether or not intercoolers work period compared to if the make more power by just slapping a bigger one on a car when it already had a smaller one. On a stock car where you are not already overwhelming the SMIC, THE AIR WILL NOT BE ANY COLDER, IT WILL JUST TAKE IT LONGER TO NOT COOL THE AIR AS EFFICIENTLY!! (takes longer to heatsoak, and you can almost instantly heat soak a factory SMIC with 400+hp).

Now here is one theoretical that might half way support your notion. You have a pretty stock (bolt on) car that you are already running .9 bar on which is heating the air up pretty good through that stock turbo (already tuned). You can add a FMIC and IF YOU RETUNE IT to take advantage of the fact that you can now run more timing, you could gain a few ponies.

Also, saying x amount of boost can be supported by x intercooler is dumb. As with the same misconception about how much a stock headgasket can take, it has to do with hp, not boost, and also where you are in the turbo's efficiency map. A stock RB20 turbo @ 1.2 bar is doing nothing but pushing hot air. Even if it wouldn't blow up, you won't gain anything. Now a T88 @ .8 bar makes (I'm guessing) over 600hp. Do you think a SMIC would support that? No way. Also, could a SMIC even flow enough air with out being a HUGE restriction to make 600hp? No way.

Hmmm.....

I went from an Apexi Pod Filter (CAI with heat shield) and full 3 inch exhaust, and then solely added a GReddy V-Spec FMIC with no furthering mods - lag seemed less, and car "felt" like it pulled alot harder (running standard boost). No stats to back it up, just the feeling after driving the car for four years prior....??

Maybe it's the fact I have a large shiny thing hanging down the front now?? :D

Edited by Peter

If your not planning on upgrading the turbo, get the R34 GTT SMIC. It is bigger and rated to handle more power and it bolts into the same position as your present one, so you will be able to install it yourself. Saves the hassle of trying to fit and mount a FMIC and $$$$. If u want more info on installing the R34 SMIC pm me, or there may already be a post of how to do the upgrade. Its rated for like 200+ rwkw so unless your gunna upgrade ur turbo you dont need a FM. Cheaper to buy and relativley easy to install...

My comments are from other peoples experiences, experiments, comments on stock intercooler,

etc and from my own reasearch into stock and upgraded intercoolers, etc and their

applications.

Well...in your research have you tried it for yourself? an fmic does add more power if not for the fact that the charge air is cooler and denser then also because it flows better than the restrictve stock smic...

Even on a stockish car there would be a slight increase in performace with the addition of just an fmic...and without even touching the boost...

On a side note...alex r33s2gts25t...i could be wrong but doesn't a r34 smic need some modifications to the inlet/outlets for it to fit? I remember reading somewhere that it was the case with fitting to r32s but it might not be the case for r33s...

Edited by limpus
On a side note...alex r33s2gts25t...i could be wrong but doesn't a r34 smic need some modifications to the inlet/outlets for it to fit? I remember reading somewhere that it was the case with fitting to r32s but it might not be the case for r33s...

Nah on the R33 the bolts line up perfectly... the hardest part is getting the front bumper off lol... the only thing that becomes a tight fit after u put the r34 one on is the wheel guard... but its flexible nd plastic.. so i just cable tied it back to its original holes at the base of the bumper because they wouldnt quite reach... its pretty much just a swap job

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...