Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Varies from person to person,I would start using a belt when ur form starts to deteriorate, for me that's around 170kg, though I do have a mate that does 300+ 1RM and he starts to use one at 180kg, wouldn't hurt to start using it after ur warm up set.

I'm talkin bout deadlifts btw

Edited by GTR_JOEY

Yea, weight belt plus chain and caribean clip is what I have always used for chin ups. I bought a belt for $15 from hart sport and $3 of chain, $6 for the clip from bunnings. I've never used it for dead lifts or squats though, lol. But I guess the option is there if I need it.

Was talking about a belt to support ya core, sorry stopped reading the thread properly lol

It is debatable. Some lifters do some don't.

I've seen plenty of people do 250KG without a belt, others have been injured at some point and now only do heavy sets with a belt.

However, even those using belts do most of their sets without the belt as it can cause weakness in some muscles.

I've never tried using a belt.

the way i see it, the less "protection" gear you use the better. teach your body to be independent (if that even makes any sense) your body will probably get too attached to it and before you know it you can't complete a formed set without having a belt etc on

could be wrong, either way not gonna look at it any differently

Generally if u practice good technique on lighter weights and slowly pile up the weight over a long period of time u will be a lot less prone to back injury.

The down fall of many lifters starting out is they go too hard too early and thats when injury can occur.

Some_cs_Student: u dont need to wear a belt to lift 250kg, though alot of lifters would recommend a belt at that weight, that would include a lot of big power lifters.

You should try wearing one at some stage, i was appose to it for a long time untill i gave it ago and i felt alot more comfortable lifting while wearing one. (whether it is placebo effect or not). You may like it, ya never know.

R-spec: I agree that you should teach your body to be independant. Thats why i generally dont like to use equipment such as smith machines and hand straps. Though i think that using a belt is a different story as it is generally used to prevent injury as apose to machines that can restrict the natural movement of the body and cause injury.

Thats my opinion anyway

I used a belt for my 5th set of squats/deads when I was doing a 5x5 program....Was squatting around 150x5 and deadlifting 160x5. Didn't really use the belt on any of the other 4 sets which were building up to the heaviest weight, but they were usually around 120/130/140 etc

Basically used the belt on the 5th set until I progressed past that weight, which would mean the previous weeks best would be the 4th set, and the 5th set would go up 5+ kg..

yep fair enough, as the body gets fatigued technique starts to go out the window. That would be the time to use a belt.

Best bet is to listen to ur body, either that or get ur spotter to watch ur form.

sorry haven't read whole topic but in regards to deadlifts, for the people who experience lower back issues/discomfort, especially taller guys who require larger/longer ROM when performing that exercise, barbell v-bar rows do an excellent job of adding thickness without putting as much stress on ur discs like deadlifts.. just a thought :)

sorry haven't read whole topic but in regards to deadlifts, for the people who experience lower back issues/discomfort, especially taller guys who require larger/longer ROM when performing that exercise, barbell v-bar rows do an excellent job of adding thickness without putting as much stress on ur discs like deadlifts.. just a thought :)

Agreed...seated row is also good at this depending on your action/ROM. As a tall person with a history of lower back injury, I cop a lot of strain from deadlifts...I avoid them because they scare me, but would like to get into them if I could avoid the strain.

seated row technique is debated... I treat it like I would do a standing barbell row or T bar row and lock my lower back in and don't move it... I've seen a lot of guys reaching right forward and rounding their back... I've always found that technique a little dubious

I think you'd be safer doing deadlifts with correct technique, locking your lower back in and avoiding rounding... you don't need to be a hero and go super heavy

friggin good mornings are a killer too... I find it works my abs really hard as they try and stabilize your core

I lock my lower back in personally, i.e. static position with chest out and shoulders pulled back, that's definitely the safest way...I have seen some big guys do the full rowing motion with 250 pounds and no issues though...would destroy my little back lol.

My issue with deadlifts, and it's probably because I'm not flexible enough or am doing it with the wrong technique, but my knees seem to stick out too far in front, which forces me to round the back a little / lean forward to clear my knees...even when I'm leaning back and rolling the bar up my shins. Hard to explain, but the exercise definitely doesn't feel right.

Yeah I've seen guys do that rounded back row with the whole weight stack and they seem fine with it... I won't be trying it though

I get that issue, I sometimes scrape my knees on the way up... I guess you should concentrate on straightening your legs first... then pulling back... I concentrate on thrusting my hips forward and leaning backwards as I come up... you can always try the variations, stiff leg, Romanian or even just rack pulls

TBH I really hate doing deads, I did them yesterday and today I struggled to tie my shoes...I just do them because I know its a bit of a weakness because I spend all day sat on my ass

Might have to get one of you Melbournians to show me how to do them properly in case it is the wrong technique...it's not really that I feel a great deal of strain, I'm just worried the strain I'm getting is a joint thing and not just muscle strain. Had it drilled into me as a child not to lift with my back, so am scared I will get injured because I may not be doing it right.

Another reason I'm scared is because I had an underlying back issue not that long ago. Until recently I had a terrible working posture...basically slouched on a chair all day and it started to screw with my lower back when doing behind neck military press. I used to bend over slowly and I could feel my lower back creaking like a rusty door...wasn't mega painful, but very offputting. Definitely feels better these days, now that I'm sitting up perfectly straight at work.

<cut>

My issue with deadlifts, and it's probably because I'm not flexible enough or am doing it with the wrong technique, but my knees seem to stick out too far in front, which forces me to round the back a little / lean forward to clear my knees...even when I'm leaning back and rolling the bar up my shins. Hard to explain, but the exercise definitely doesn't feel right.

Some upper back arching is ok, lower back rounding is not ok. Your technique sounds wrong...what's your stance like (width wise)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...