Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, had my car dyno's was expecting a little more but anywayz, though maybe we could have a discussion on here =D

RB25DET

GReddy Intake

80mm TB

FMIC

3" intake pipe

BOV

Billet fuel rail

550cc Inj

Bosche 910 pump

surge tank

Sard Reg

high flow fttings etc

GT30R .82r

kazama manifold

44mm Gate

3" system

splitfire coils

EMS 4424 stinger

Auto box, had a manual valve body but box i believe was slipping at time of tune

330rwhp @ 16.5psi

think something is wrong? or do i need to retune once i get my properly built box back from top quality transmissions?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201493-rb25-power-output-low-or-avergae/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be trying for too much more than that out of a standard? 25. There are some that can reach the high 300's & maybe a bit over, but it is risky & it depends how it's driven.

From what I read, I was under the impression that by 300rwhp the RB25 would be on a knife's edge for reliability....

Hmmm....

i have been running 335rwhp now for over 6months without a problem, (most likely longer just cant remember), also ive taken it to the track more than once and had a full drift pract day at the track without a problem :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...