Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey boys and girls....mmm i danno if this is sposed to be the right power for my mods but yeah i just dynoed my car at top racing ! and i got 256.2 horsepower...

mods:

3 inch xforce front dump pipe bell mouth style ----> stock N/A Cat converter knocked out----> 3 inch catback exhaust

Power FC, Power FC boost control kit, stock turbo tuned for 12 psi, Walbro fuel pump, China frount mount, Apexi power intake pod, Z32 afm so yeah :) and i still got the NA clutch in there but waiting on my new clutch to arrive so yeah any opinions :D

post-27271-1200312466_thumb.jpg

Cheers

Chi

Edited by Chi100188
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

doesnt sound too bad, but remember a dyno is only a tuning tool :)

my car only makes 224hp with FMIC, pod, exhaust, coils, still using stock ecu with a slide hiflow pumping 1 bar, this was on west racing's dyno, seems low but my car has no traction in 1st and no traction for the first half of 2nd with an occasional chirp in 3rd :D and v8s, well, i make them history :) lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3581770
Share on other sites

Hmm.... seems pretty low figures.. or i might be wrong. I went to ovaboost about 6 months ago and got 220hp at 10psi.. without FMIC, fuel pump, and hiflow cat.

Maybe i got a fake hp reading?

So how much you get the dyno done for at top racing?

Will need to get dyno tuning done some time soon...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3581835
Share on other sites

hmmm they only charged me 2 hours yeah i guess it is pretty low hmmm hahah danno aslong as it doesn't hunt now and doesn't knock high im happY :D hahah but yeah ill prolly finish off the zorst and make it more free flowing and yea 175 per an hour so 350 all up :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3581846
Share on other sites

year and half ago on xspeeds dyno bros r33 made 267rwhp on 12/13 psi with fmic,pod,exhaust,power fc, and blitz ebc,(no upgraded fuel pump or anything else besides hks clutch) and that's what came out the printer :D

Edited by showbizz
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3581878
Share on other sites

hmmmm so i guess mines pretty much spot on aye? lol ahh well ! hahah perhaps a cold air induction box would be good :D anyone wanan cut a hole for me? hahah my car was NA so it didn't have intercooler piping hole someone cut me a whole and ill pay them :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3581892
Share on other sites

i think its a Ebc...well it measures in mmHG which i have nfi...lol but its holding boost good mate :) and its simple, i just bought it cause i can use it wtih my pfc....yeah no more hunting and just 2 hours :D hahaha yeah some who can cut me a hole so i can do some CAI?

hahah

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3581910
Share on other sites

POD Air Filter (unshielded :D)

3" Split Just Jap Stainless Dump/Front

3" XForce Hi-Flow Cat

3" Catback (Mild Steel) & Stainless Milo-Tin

Front Mount Intercooler

Apexi AFC Neo

Blitz Spec R Boost Controller (tuned on ~12psi)

Splitfire Coilpacks

Tomei Fuel Pump

Active LSD (prob makes 0 difference)

Edited by SKY RYAN
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3582273
Share on other sites

well do it for me :) haha man i gota knock of 144 ;) while i was giving it some from 4th gear to 5th gear reved around 5.5k scared me ! :( luckily top racing is looking at it again ;) hahah mmm yeah skyryan imma get a de cat pipe, replace central muffler with 3 inch pipe (this is because its got a pretty big dent in the muffler) then enclose the pd and take it to the quater one day :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3584002
Share on other sites

I got 292.9rwhp at top racing dyno with same mods minus PFC, but the car went shithouse at the drags (humid though). Don't think I trust dyno's anymore.. measure it with a quarter mile time lawl.

1/4 mile is half ok, if you can't drive or can't get the power down you will get a shitty time. the top end MPH is really the only indicator at the strip.

and chi your problem is the stock cat, and your exhaust system :)

let me know when u go racing, wanna test out the twin plate lol

Edited by [Michael]
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201554-dyno/#findComment-3584102
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...