Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Went to order a set of the Noltec front upper camber adjustable arms for my 32 gtr today, and have been told they have been discontinued... now I'm looking at the Silk Road front camber arms as they seem to be of the same design/principle... has anyone bought these? or seen them in the flesh? just trying to gauge adjustability/reliability I guess...

post-19425-1200312018_thumb.jpg . post-19425-1200312042_thumb.jpg

I've also looked at the Midori front upper links but I'm not too keen on paying $650+ when the Silk Road arms are ~$350.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201556-silk-road-front-upper-camber-arms/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I've also looked at the Midori front upper links but I'm not too keen on paying $650+ when the Silk Road arms are ~$350.

well they are chinese made (section/silk road) so i would not want to pay too much more than 350, the midori ones are made in japan and were copied by many like KTS (also taiwan) etc.

if your happy with the silk road ones check out driftshop.com.au and ask costa if he has his version in stock... im sure they would be the same thing and as far as cheap arms go his are the better of what is available here. I ve used his stuff a bit when in a bind and it has alsways been better than the other generic stuff.

Went to order a set of the Noltec front upper camber adjustable arms for my 32 gtr today, and have been told they have been discontinued... now I'm looking at the Silk Road front camber arms as they seem to be of the same design/principle... has anyone bought these? or seen them in the flesh? just trying to gauge adjustability/reliability I guess...

post-19425-1200312018_thumb.jpg . post-19425-1200312042_thumb.jpg

I've also looked at the Midori front upper links but I'm not too keen on paying $650+ when the Silk Road arms are ~$350.

They are a bitch to adjust, you can't get to the locking nut while the arm is connected. You will pay more for every wheel alignment as a result.

Cheers

Gary

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/D-Project-FRONT-CAM...7QQcmdZViewItem

are the driftshop ones you mentioned URAS?

SK, have you seen these used? I know you aren't a fan of having everythign so solid...

Haven't seen them in use as yet, won't be long though, without dust seals and grease retention they won't last very long. So I will have guys PM'ing me for advice on how to stop the knocking.

Hard to tell exactly from the pictures, but their minimum length looks too long for sufficient negative camber on the high speed tracks (eg; Philip Island)

Cheers

Gary

yeah making the lower arm longer is a good thing. gives you more track as well as the camber you need. the only reason people don't do it more often is the cost. typically the lower arms cost more than double the uppers.

Plus it always screws up the bump steer something fierce, often changes the Ackerman and does no good at all for the dynamic camber change. If you fix those things then, yep, longer lower control arms work fine.

Cheers

Gary

Yeh, not sure what it does to bump steer but assumed it woudl be bad for ackerman.

Im slowly learning with cars. Keepign it simple means the best results. To get stupidly good results you either need to own a GTR and have a workshop that has done all the R&D or wear the cost yourself. Stick with the Noltec arms, or speak to UAS about his replacement arms that he is bringing to market very soon, they look to be good things for the R32/Z32 range that can chew bushes when you run too much camber abd castor

Can't help you with if they are any good - But where are you getting them from at that price?

Greenline

I went ahead and got the Section arms, they are made rather well but I can see what SK means by being a bitch to adjust, you basically have to pull them out, reset, and put back in, I installed them on their lowest camber setting (pulled all the way in), and I didnt get much negative camber at all... :blink:

Would it be super dodgey to slot the mounts? :thumbsup:

post-19425-1204190697_thumb.jpg

....speak to UAS about his replacement arms that he is bringing to market very soon...
I sent off an e-mail to UAS.

Checked my mail today and recieved an e-mail on from UAS on Monday, "...waiting to get an eta but suspect next month and they are the best on the market and unique in design"

Stay tuned

Haven't seen them in use as yet, won't be long though, without dust seals and grease retention they won't last very long.

two years no greasing with regular checks (i would suggest checking after a trip into the sand traps though :) ) and still going strong with nil play..... these are used in most of japans fastest super lap cars.

http://www.nagisa-auto.com/

Far more than just cheap chinese arms, most have rc + bs correction and so forth in built.

Greenline

I went ahead and got the Section arms, they are made rather well but I can see what SK means by being a bitch to adjust, you basically have to pull them out, reset, and put back in, I installed them on their lowest camber setting (pulled all the way in), and I didnt get much negative camber at all... :)

Would it be super dodgey to slot the mounts? :)

post-19425-1204190697_thumb.jpg

Most of the retail camber kits are designed to REMOVE the negative camber that occurs when Skylines are lowered. This is because the “road car market” is far larger than the “race car market” and they are looking at excessive inside tyre wear as the major problem that they need to overcome by adjusting the camber. For reference, the standard R32 style upper control arm is ~180 mm long, centre of the outer bolt to the centre of the inner bolt. Using the off the shelf adjustable, offset, outer bush (Whiteline etc) reduces that to ~175 mm. This gives around 2 to 2.5 degrees of negative camber on an R32 with a ride height around 355 mm centre of wheel to guard with around 6.5 degrees of caster on a 2wd and 5.0 degrees on a 4wd.

That is usually enough camber/caster, provided sufficient anti roll is used (larger stabiliser bars), for most circuits. High speed circuits with long sweeping radius curves (eg; Philip Island) need slightly more camber.

So we use the off the shelf adjustable, offset bush (Whiteline etc) in the inner of the upper control arm. That reduces the length to around 170 mm. This gives around 3.0 to 3.5 degrees of negative camber on an R32 with a ride height around 355 mm centre of wheel to guard with around 6.5 degrees of caster on a 2wd and 5.0 degrees on a 4wd.

This 170 mm length seems to have been the minimum that ALL of the R32 camber adjusters have been made to. Of all of the brands of upper control arms that I have measured (Noltec, Nismo, Ikeya etc) the minimum is 172 mm. many are longer. So choosing one brand over another to get more negative camber is pretty much a waste of time.

Keep in mind that when you add caster, the R32 designed upper control arm has no choice but to distort the bushes. Hence they become a consumable item, you simply have to change them regularly. Just like brake pads, the bushes wear out and need replacement. This is why Nissan changed the design of the front upper control arm on 33's and 34's.

You can't easily slot the outer holes due to the design of the upright (hub). If you slot the inner holes enough to make a worthwhile difference, the arm rubs on the inner guard.

Cheers

Gary

Gary,

Here is the Cusco fixed arm I just bought. (Thanks Tacker :)) Centre distances are 172mm. Unusually they use a common bearing: 6203Z if anyone cares. I was going to knock those out & replace them with some bushes.

Also of note is the amount of stagger, ie how far the inside is behind the outside is 23mm. Not sure if adjusting this would help generate more castor without negative side effects.

post-5134-1204773073_thumb.jpg

Edited by djr81
Gary,

I think you may have confused the stock length with the adjusted length. From memory the stockers are 182 centre to centre.

Here is the Cusco fixed arm I just bought. (Thanks Tacker :)) Centre distances are 172mm. Unusually they use a common bearing: 6203Z if anyone cares. I was going to knock those out & replace them with some bushes.

Also of note is the amount of stagger, ie how far the inside is behind the outside is 23mm. Not sure if adjusting this would help generate more castor without negative side effects.

Thanks, I should learn to never rely on my failing memory, post amended accordingly.

Cheers

Gar

Random question:

You can move the bottom of the upright forward for more castor. But given the arm has stagger built in, can you move the top further back? That assumes you fab up your own arms - which isn't hard looking at the Cusco ones.

Edited by djr81

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...