Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

it's not really about the power gain, it's about protection from lowering the intake temps.

True, cos people found that stock intercooler are too small, and after a few times of acceleration it starting to loose its efficiency. It's even worse if you run higher than stock boost. I think my car on dyno last time only did about 2-3 runs on 9psi and the stock intercooler started to get heat soak :P.

Personally I would go for the standard pipe return way rather then over the top of the fan way, using the standard returns just makes it look neater and you don’t have to worry about cutting the hole for the pipe to go through and trimming your fan blade for it all to fit.

Really it’s up yo the end user and I don’t see that much power difference between the three different cooler layouts. It would only be a couple of rwkw either way, if that.

I agree.....and that couple of rwkw difference are usually towards the top rev range. I don't need that as I'm not trying to win a dyno comp.... and I don't drive my car on the street at a constant 6500rpm :D.

Personally I would go for the standard pipe return way rather then over the top of the fan way, using the standard returns just makes it look neater and you don’t have to worry about cutting the hole for the pipe to go through and trimming your fan blade for it all to fit.

Really it’s up yo the end user and I don’t see that much power difference between the three different cooler layouts. It would only be a couple of rwkw either way, if that.

I prefer the 120 degree bend at the throttle body style, no fan shroud trimming, less heat soak and shorter pipe for better throttle response. :D

I started this thread a long time ago and am surprised it's still alive and kicking. I'm sure i've posted what i ended up doing somewhere on this thread but i'll clear up some points about aftermarket piping.

I fitted to my R33 GTS-t the TRUST V-SPL FMIC kit, which uses non-standard piping routes.

1) I did not cut any fan shroud/blades at all to fit the cooler piping which goes to the throttle body.

2) Yes, you do have to cut a hole in the side of your inner driver's side guard, as well as a little bit of grinding away of the lower inside ends of you bumper support. (Hard to explain in words but it was a piece 1cm x 4cm at end end to square off the roundish bumper support to fit the end tanks of the cooler in)

3) You have to move the horns but with this, all you need is a little "S" shape braket to move them closer to your radiator thus fitting between your cooler and radiator still.

4) You will need to modify your front bar accordingly.

5) Everything else bolts straight up.

As SK said, the 120 degree bend trick is the shortest route (with the exception of a Greddy inlet plenum) but if you're only worried about cutting your fan blades, then this isn't worth the time or money to fabricate in my opinion as cutting them isn't necessary if done correctly.

Hope that helps add to the discussion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...