Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok i figure this way looks the easiest in my space and tools i have to work with. or someone please guide me if i am going a hard way about this..

I plan on removing the whole lot in one go and lifting the car up and over the motor/gearbox or sliding the motor out.. whatever comes at that point.

the gearbox doesnt really need to come out. so should i just take out the motor and leave the rest in? i have the trust front pipe kit so it may get in the way lifting the motor out?

i'll do a search on removing the rb26 if i have to hopefully theres a guide thru it!!

i've got an engine crane, jacks, stands, tools or someone will have what i need if i get stuck..

plan to do this on the weekend or monday.. see how it all goes.

also what time frame are you looking at for pulling it out? i'm a moderate worker and my friend is pretty quick and handy.

Cheers :rolleyes:

Andrew

i reckon leave it in if you can, i had to mod the gearbox housing to suit the RB30 block and therefore it had to come out. i've also got trust long pipes and the gearbox was a real problem to get back in as the pipes interfered. with care the engine went back in fine with them on.

leaving it in also means no atessa bleeding.

we did engine and box together once and it was a PITA to get back into the engine bay with all that tilting. Then again until you have had too much practice some of the other bits like the top bellhousing bolts and starter motor bolts are tricky.

i beleive i am just going to do the motor by itself now, i have pulled gearboxes off before and i know the bolts on it are probably about the worst part of the whole thing. so not really that much of a problem!!

now as for the questions regarding internals.

do i really need to pay the money for jap brand rods, and jap brand pistons (2500-3K) when you can get eagle and wiseco pistons for atleast half if not more than half the price ??(1300 at most)?

planning on going going .040 oversize and eagle h beam rods with arp 2000's unless otherwise???

shaving the head a little and give some more compression a nice thin headgasket what ever the engine builder recomends.

and then its time to finish off the dry sump!

I find it easier to pull out engine/box together but each to their own.

Duncan, I don't find it hard at all, I use block and tacle on a fixed beam pull it up and then move the car back .

Angus, I preer to use jap pistons for a road car , much quieter than American pistons because you can run closer clearences .

i dont have a block and tackle, only an engine crane some jack stands and a large jack. i dont wanna drive my car to my friends shop incase it f**ks up.

so running yank rods and jap pistons is ok? i gotta get my head around this soon! and start buying bits and pieces!

whats wrong with aussie pistons from ACL?

Jerry - how do you manage the angle you need to get the gearbox/engine too - we just could not get it cleanly over the radiator support and ended up bending it :)

i found it easier to take them both out in one hit too... however it's a bit of a mission getting it back in, but i reckon it would be easier than trying to re-align the shaft and re-position the motor at the same time.

i got mine over the radiator support easy enough, i just crushed my power steering lines on the cross-member instead. :)

there is a item called an engine sling you can use to change the angle of the engine by screwing the threaded section.. would definately make it a bit easier!

su-5208.jpg

I guess i could go with acl also. depending on price

i've really got no idea about it at all. there is alot of product out there, last time i went with tomei, but 1600-2500 for just pistons is a bit of a joke.

is there anything wrong with eagle rods? and wiseco pistons? i can get them delivered @ $1285 usd and will probalby miss out on getting caught in customs for duties

i can go wiseco, cp, or je pistons. the later two bieng an extra 170 on top.

also some arp head studs for 255usd.

also concept on Ferrea valves 1mm oversize/guides/springs

https://www.horsepowerparts.com/index.php?c...p;rows_shown=20

if anyone wants to look and advise? there is the link for all the rb26 stuff

:)

Edited by Angus Smart
whats wrong with aussie pistons from ACL?

Jerry - how do you manage the angle you need to get the gearbox/engine too - we just could not get it cleanly over the radiator support and ended up bending it :)

I don't know how high your crane will lift Duncan, the trick is to lift it high on an angle at the same time have the car on stands so you can get the angle you need. I have done it on all 3 models this way without any problems .

Yes you will have to be carefull not to hit the power steer lines ( you need 2 people , one lifting the other watching). In anyway its a tight fit in there but I can't see it any easierjust taking the donk out unless you use a hoist.

Nothing wrong with ACL pistons, I just prefer Jap for a road car for the reasons I gave before, I would use yank pistons on a race car thats for sure , who cares about a blow-by and or piston slap on a race car..

Angus you can use any pistons and any rod combo you like, keep in mind cast pistons are quiet ( close clearences) and forged are rattly. Depending on the power you need/want, I would use my stock standard Nissan rods and i Nisan crank too.

Yeah well i think its pushing more towards a race car these days, and the very occasional street.... as i am considering doing the engine right this time and doing a dry sump setup. and stripping out alot of weight and shit i dont need. tho air con i want.. haha

from that link above its either going to be je, cp , or the cheeper wisecos.

thinking of doing the whole ferrera 1mm oversize valves and the rest of the business there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...