Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Here's a link to the R35 GT-R in testing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBifjuV_WUA&feature=user

Nissan have indicated that they are taking this very serious as the GT-R's racing heritage is so important. I know very little about the series though I thought the race car had very little in common with the road car, same as the v8 supercars in Aust. Therefore it's simply a case of the biggest wallet wins, provided they can buy the right talent?

Therefore the race car this year will only have progressed in a similar sort of fashion to that it would have done anyway whether it is a R35 GT-R shell or not.

Am I right in my thinking?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203298-new-gt-r-gt500-in-testing/
Share on other sites

Unlike the V8's which use 1960's NASCAR technology, the R35 still uses some factory parts including the gearbox. comparing the two is like comparing chocolate and shit ;)

I'm sure there is alot more in common between the race R35 and the production R35 then we think.

Unlike the V8's which use 1960's NASCAR technology, the R35 still uses some factory parts including the gearbox. comparing the two is like comparing chocolate and shit ;)

I'm sure there is alot more in common between the race R35 and the production R35 then we think.

if that is true it will be a big change from all other current Super GT cars which use conventional sequential boxes not DSGs.

and there is very little in common with the road going car, having seen and even touched the new R35 Super GT car it is just like most other Japanese Super GT cars. purpose built race car with a dry carbon body that resembles the road car. that's it.

if that is true it will be a big change from all other current Super GT cars which use conventional sequential boxes not DSGs.

Indeed. I'm trying to think of where i read that it uses teh same box. cant remember now :) hope I'm right.

Its not really fair to compare the super taxis to the gt500 cars - the gt cars have about 150hp less and are a couple of seconds a lap quicker. Neither are too close to production cars, they are just meant to look similar.

gt500 has long banned some of the gtr's production stuff like 4wd, not sure if the gearbox will be an issue as DSG isn't that dissimilar to a straight cut sequential box in shift time (and might be less reliable in racing conditions anyway).

Can't wait to see this car on track, I might head up to Malaysia in June to see it run

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...