Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I pretended that i got really excited about the new GTR, i went on YouTube to watch it, i've got the Super GT version on my desktop, i told my GF, my work college, the guy that owns a Porka that i came across at the pub, i gave my mate with his 300zx shit because its a V6.........ect.

I don't really know about this V6 thing if not it sounds GAY to me, seriously. I've own 3 straight 6s for the last 10 years, 1 x 2.8lt 5ME Supra, 1 x RB25DET, 1 x RB26DETT BUT now the car that i like so much is equipped with a V6. Not only its a V6 but its now massive, i can put about 3 or 4 of my asian ass in and it still fit me fine :), oh and it doesn't even called a Skyline anymore :( so i'm going to buy an R34gtr and stick with it (not that i can ever afford the R35 anyway) :).

Sorry, just rant :banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I pretended that i got really excited about the new GTR, i went on YouTube to watch it, i've got the Super GT version on my desktop, i told my GF, my work college, the guy that owns a Porka that i came across at the pub, i gave my mate with his 300zx shit because its a V6.........ect.

I don't really know about this V6 thing if not it sounds GAY to me, seriously. I've own 3 straight 6s for the last 10 years, 1 x 2.8lt 5ME Supra, 1 x RB25DET, 1 x RB26DETT BUT now the car that i like so much is equipped with a V6. Not only its a V6 but its now massive, i can put about 3 or 4 of my asian ass in and it still fit me fine :), oh and it doesn't even called a Skyline anymore :( so i'm going to buy an R34gtr and stick with it (not that i can ever afford the R35 anyway) :).

Sorry, just rant :banana:

Whats so "GAY" about an engine that is years ahead of all those you've mentioned and in stock form leaves all those you mentioned for dead? So i suppose an F1 "V"10/8 is gay, or the "V" engines in otehr supercars are gay?

I can understand people bagging the styling, interior etc, but seriously how you can bag the R35 on performance is beyond me - weight included.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3611784
Share on other sites

Keichi Tsuchiya (the Drift King) said in a YouTube Time Attack video that he's always loved inline 6's for how they make power, and is regretful that companies in the 21st century are now reverting to V6's because they are more compact.

I prefer inline 6's but that's cause they blew me away. If i drove an R35 i'm sure i'd love V6's too.

That said i think the RB is nicer sounding and makes power more aggressively than the VQ. But stock for stock the VQ is more advanced, and the VR is well above them all re technology.

Sadly for the thread starter- you just have to accept the times, inline-6's are old tech and will be appreciated like an old burly Mustang, but they're superseded. :banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3611822
Share on other sites

Research has shown that V6 platforms provide better weight distrubution and power delivery.

For example...the bugatti veyron, it uses a W16, you wouldnt use a straight 16...

harsh and maybe irevelant comparision but hey..The future is V6.

The RB26 will always be king in my book.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612033
Share on other sites

Whats so "GAY" about an engine that is years ahead of all those you've mentioned and in stock form leaves all those you mentioned for dead? So i suppose an F1 "V"10/8 is gay, or the "V" engines in otehr supercars are gay?

I can understand people bagging the styling, interior etc, but seriously how you can bag the R35 on performance is beyond me - weight included.

You meant a stock Z will leave a stock gtr for dead or a stock commo v6 will leave a supra 6 for dead?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612040
Share on other sites

I'm sure nissan or someone can "exhaust tune" the v6 to sound good. My problem with thr 35 is "WEIGHT!!!!!!" I run out and buy one tomorow if it weight in around 1400-1500kgs but not at the luxo sedan numbers.

Honestly i was waiting in the wing to buy one when it got released, only to find out the weight was heavier than a school bus..

I owned an Audi RS6 for 3 years and it weights in at 1800 odd kgs with 350 odd kw and I can tell you the car was fun to drive and fast from A to B but doesnt matter how much I was in denial of the weight issues until you have to make sudden direction changes. The law of physics comes in and reminds you that you have some beef under the seat...

I'm still hoping some how nissan will deliver a "stripper" version even with same power levels, I'll still be happy, but not ATM all the years waiting for nothing.

The sound issue would be overcome pretty easy in my mind, be just as sexy, just different, like a hot brunnette or blonde.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612065
Share on other sites

the only thing your indial about my friend is your sexuality....you love the cock

Stop thinking about C**K Troy ROFL,

You love it too much where you're having this illusion that everyone else loves it too ROFL. Regardless i think you should sell me that GTR of your for dirt cheap since its sitting there collectiong dirt anyway :banana:.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612076
Share on other sites

I'm sure nissan or someone can "exhaust tune" the v6 to sound good. My problem with thr 35 is "WEIGHT!!!!!!" I run out and buy one tomorow if it weight in around 1400-1500kgs but not at the luxo sedan numbers.

Honestly i was waiting in the wing to buy one when it got released, only to find out the weight was heavier than a school bus..

I owned an Audi RS6 for 3 years and it weights in at 1800 odd kgs with 350 odd kw and I can tell you the car was fun to drive and fast from A to B but doesnt matter how much I was in denial of the weight issues until you have to make sudden direction changes. The law of physics comes in and reminds you that you have some beef under the seat...

I'm still hoping some how nissan will deliver a "stripper" version even with same power levels, I'll still be happy, but not ATM all the years waiting for nothing.

The sound issue would be overcome pretty easy in my mind, be just as sexy, just different, like a hot brunnette or blonde.

You've gotta drive it before you write it off like that. It certainly does not feel it's weight.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612085
Share on other sites

yeah i would have prefered an inline 6 after owning a 260c inline 6 and now my GTR 32 as well. ive always responded to commo people screaming v6 is better than inline6 with "i like to keep things straight" :banana: would the car have been that different if it was a 3.7L inline 6

but at the end of the day whatever makes the better peformance is more important than keeping with tradition. and part of the tradition is kicking more expensive cars ass's

Edited by gzilla
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612123
Share on other sites

Stop thinking about C**K Troy ROFL,

You love it too much where you're having this illusion that everyone else loves it too ROFL. Regardless i think you should sell me that GTR of your for dirt cheap since its sitting there collectiong dirt anyway :banana:.

your ROLF should be ROFWSYAB (roll on the floor with some young asian boy)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612144
Share on other sites

You meant a stock Z will leave a stock gtr for dead or a stock commo v6 will leave a supra 6 for dead?

C'mon West, you mean the inline L26 carby from my old skyline C210 is better than the V6 from my V35?

You were complaining about the R35 GTR being a V6 so I was comparing the inline 6's you listed to the R35 V6.

You can't compare a stock Z with a stock GTR RB26. One has two snails and one has none.

If you look at the APS twin turbo set up for the Z it pretty much is what you would expect a stock twin turbo Z out of Nissan to look like. Now compare that with a "Stock" RB26DETT. A VQ with stock internals with this set up gives you a safe 380odd hp at the wheels on around 8psi. All this in a set up with almost zero lag.

Guess i'm a little biased driving a "V" and all. :banana:

But in all seriousness it's the way cars are going like it or not. Even the M3 is no longer an inline 6 and that motor was pure performance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612202
Share on other sites

C'mon West, you mean the inline L26 carby from my old skyline C210 is better than the V6 from my V35?

You were complaining about the R35 GTR being a V6 so I was comparing the inline 6's you listed to the R35 V6.

You can't compare a stock Z with a stock GTR RB26. One has two snails and one has none.

If you look at the APS twin turbo set up for the Z it pretty much is what you would expect a stock twin turbo Z out of Nissan to look like. Now compare that with a "Stock" RB26DETT. A VQ with stock internals with this set up gives you a safe 380odd hp at the wheels on around 8psi. All this in a set up with almost zero lag.

Guess i'm a little biased driving a "V" and all. :(

But in all seriousness it's the way cars are going like it or not. Even the M3 is no longer an inline 6 and that motor was pure performance.

Sorry i was refering to the Z32 and the R32 but anyway.......its today's technology thing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612233
Share on other sites

I didn't bag the R35 performance neither the new Z, i just personally don't like the V engine, simple. I know the in-line 6 is old but i like it :( .

I know where your coming from. Its probably because when someone says a v6/v8 u think of a crappy commodore engine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203726-im-in-denial/#findComment-3612472
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...