Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Id suggest a remap would be the better option

more of a "complete" tune compared to a piggyback.

Fuel Pump is DIY - see the DIY Thread Guide.

Id recommend a Bosch 040 or 044 fuel pump.

Id recommend a Nismo FPR (dont use a rising rate regulator)

or in lieu of the FPR Im pretty sure you can upgrade your RB20 310cc(?) injectors to stock GTR items, 444cc

I dont want much more power, but want a better tune

hence Im awaiting delivery of Deatschwerks 550cc injectors from the states

got a HKS heavy duty actuator, got a set of Splitfire coilpacks, and a R34 GTT PowerFc with boost control kit

all ready to be re-wired up and tuned, just awaiting the injectors, and oh the ca$h too !!

might even piggyback the Power-fc onto the stagea ecu

Id suggest a remap would be the better option

more of a "complete" tune compared to a piggyback.

Fuel Pump is DIY - see the DIY Thread Guide.

Id recommend a Bosch 040 or 044 fuel pump.

Id recommend a Nismo FPR (dont use a rising rate regulator)

or in lieu of the FPR Im pretty sure you can upgrade your RB20 310cc(?) injectors to stock GTR items, 444cc

I dont want much more power, but want a better tune

hence Im awaiting delivery of Deatschwerks 550cc injectors from the states

got a HKS heavy duty actuator, got a set of Splitfire coilpacks, and a R34 GTT PowerFc with boost control kit

all ready to be re-wired up and tuned, just awaiting the injectors, and oh the ca$h too !!

might even piggyback the Power-fc onto the stagea ecu

I have a brand new one that I didn't use if you get stuck.

Agreed with simon about the FPR.

Im also using one as an interim measure.

Will be getting injectors wwhen I do a big(ish) power upgrade in 6 months or so.

HKS 2535, Tomeii Cams, SARD injectors, 044 external pump and surge tank, forward facing plenum, new cooler arrangement, twin plate clutch and RB25 Gearbox.

Going to run the setup I have for a while, as I need to setup the car (has never been driven with this setup (all new sus etc) plus I need to learn how to drive full stop :laughing-smiley-014: :laughing-smiley-014: :laughing-smiley-014:

And agreed about some engines being freaks.

My RB20 Makes 180 at the wheels on 8psi, with only a FMIC, straight pipes and fuel pump. Stock ECU, stock enjectors stock everything. Using a RB25 wastegate too. Seen a lot of 25 upgraded 20's make the same power on 10 - 12 psi and with a remap.

heres the FACTS kids...

STOCK injectors and on an RB20 will see you at aroiund 220-225 rwkw before your on the very limit, thats with a stock FPR.

On an RB25 with a Malpassi FPR jeff and i made 283 rwkw with STOCK injectors.. and still had headroom (not much) this was on 20 psi.. we backed it off to 16 psi and made 265 rwkw, still stock injectors and a very safe mix... this is what ive been running for 3 months now and its nuts!

yes it does... cause theres no way in hell a stock FPR will do 283 rwkw on stock injectors.. By upping the rail pressure you are forcing more fuel through an injector... however the pump, injectors, lines and o rings are all at greater risk.

so im upgrading the injectors and backing the FPR right or or swapping back to stock... and not aiming for more power, just reliability.

ah k, wasnt sure if it would have a dramatic effect, or whether it might just be a small amount of fuel.

never just changed pump and reg. Always done injectors when I needed more fuel.

Will be changing my entire fuelling setup when I upgrade

yeah thats it.

the stock FPR can be "modded" with a pair of vice grips to raise the base fuel press.. its another common tuning trick that sounds dodgy but works...

however with all fuel pressure raising mods.. the ENTIRE map needs to be changed, this includes cold starts, idle, cruise etc to get the best economy as the FPR inscreases the pressure across the whole range... so just tuning the full loadf map will see it awesome up top but rich as hell down low.

yes it does... cause theres no way in hell a stock FPR will do 283 rwkw on stock injectors.. By upping the rail pressure you are forcing more fuel through an injector... however the pump, injectors, lines and o rings are all at greater risk.

so im upgrading the injectors and backing the FPR right or or swapping back to stock... and not aiming for more power, just reliability.

CORRECT, but only if the rail was not pressurized enough to start with, otherwise you can add another 10 or 20 psi into your rail and it won't push anymore through the injectors unless the ECU allows it.

im guessing with all this FPR talk i may need one if i want 250awkw

Like I said earlier steve, I've got a brand new adjustable Nismo fpr if you get stuck.

Unless your making massive killer wasps, a rising rate one is overkill and double or triple the price.

yeah but ive only made 187 awkw with fouled plugs on 9psi when it boosted higher plugs were cutting out i changed the plugs and runs sweet now but cant pay for power runs every week cause after few of those i could of paid for a tune

so @ what power level do i need one because bill @ ATS said the stock injectors run out of puff @ 230kw and Simon says upping the fuel he made 283

obviously also noit wanting things to go bang :no:

yeah but ive only made 187 awkw with fouled plugs on 9psi when it boosted higher plugs were cutting out i changed the plugs and runs sweet now but cant pay for power runs every week cause after few of those i could of paid for a tune

so @ what power level do i need one because bill @ ATS said the stock injectors run out of puff @ 230kw and Simon says upping the fuel he made 283

obviously also noit wanting things to go bang :no:

Don't know steve, I'd only be guessing.

Maybe speak to a few more tuners and go by the majority.

im guessing with all this FPR talk i may need one if i want 250awkw

get a tomei FPR cause they look like the stock 1 and fit in the same position un like the other ones that u have 2 attach 2 the engine bay and have 2 run hoses which u may get defected 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...