Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So what these clowns might have made a mistake, that’s what life lessons are about. :cheers:

YOU f**k up, YOU pay the price.

It just so happens that this particular mistake cost them their life, I am sure the scum bags made plenty of bad choices before hand and got away with them and so thought this to be like any other time.

You can’t blame your past for your future decisions good or bad!

Edited by mralbino
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All repeat criminals should have this happen.

I wish all the best to foamer and hope that she or he can help a percentage but even she/he has to admit that atleast 70 percent are lost causes.

I see this everyday and cant help but feel discouraged as Police try to lock these idiots up and the Judges keep letting them out with slaps on the wrist.

I am more than happy to see them on their way to hell. :yes:

I dont see how locking them up is any better. It costs taxpayers around 65 to 70,000 a year to keep each one of these rsholes incarcerated.

Bring on Three strikes I say but the third isnt incarceration for life :D if you know what I mean "COSTS ABOUT 30 CENTS.

If that was the case you would notice society for some strange reason recovering and just getting better and better.

The criminal justice system is named so because thats who it benifits.

IF MY CAR EVER GETS STOLEN I WISH THIS ON THE CAR THIEF ALTHOUGH MY CAR WOULD BE SADLY MISSED BUT I HAVE INSURANCE :) .

Edited by Imtorqing
All repeat criminals should have this happen.

I wish all the best to foamer and hope that she or he can help a percentage but even she/he has to admit that atleast 70 percent are lost causes.

I see this everyday and cant help but feel discouraged as Police try to lock these idiots up and the Judges keep letting them out with slaps on the wrist.

I am more than happy to see them on their way to hell. :/

I dont see how locking them up is any better. It costs taxpayers around 65 to 70,000 a year to keep each one of these rsholes incarcerated.

Bring on Three strikes I say but the third isnt incarceration for life :D if you know what I mean "COSTS ABOUT 30 CENTS.

If that was the case you would notice society for some strange reason recovering and just getting better and better.

The criminal justice system is named so because thats who it benifits.

IF MY CAR EVER GETS STOLEN I WISH THIS ON THE CAR THIEF ALTHOUGH MY CAR WOULD BE SADLY MISSED BUT I HAVE INSURANCE :) .

Dont know about the 30 cents part..But make them earn their keep.Fix our roads,build new dams...Slavery type of thing is a better idea...repay society for the damage they have done

I stopped reading this thread because i thought i was going to get flamed again, but after working up the courage to have a peak, things seem to have cooled off :) calling everybody a dickhead probably wasn't the best way to start my post, especially as i have just paid for my qld membership, so will probably meet quite a few of you.

just to share with you some of my frustrations, and to show you where your tax dollars are going, i have another 14 year old that i am working with, who in the past 6 months has done $52 000 thousand dollars worth of damage to property ($34 000 to workers cars and roughly $18 000 damage to property). he hasn't even been charged by the organisation, instead he has been cautioned over and over again, with the mentality of "let's not give him a criminal record as it might ruin his future". And all those costs do not take into account extra staff hours that have been paid to work with this kid. At $40 per hour that we get paid, it adds up quick.

anyway, back to work tomorrow, after a few days off to chill at the gold coast. get my skyline back from east coast customs on friday, so at least there is a light at the end of the tunnel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...