Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So what these clowns might have made a mistake, that’s what life lessons are about. :cheers:

YOU f**k up, YOU pay the price.

It just so happens that this particular mistake cost them their life, I am sure the scum bags made plenty of bad choices before hand and got away with them and so thought this to be like any other time.

You can’t blame your past for your future decisions good or bad!

Edited by mralbino
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All repeat criminals should have this happen.

I wish all the best to foamer and hope that she or he can help a percentage but even she/he has to admit that atleast 70 percent are lost causes.

I see this everyday and cant help but feel discouraged as Police try to lock these idiots up and the Judges keep letting them out with slaps on the wrist.

I am more than happy to see them on their way to hell. :yes:

I dont see how locking them up is any better. It costs taxpayers around 65 to 70,000 a year to keep each one of these rsholes incarcerated.

Bring on Three strikes I say but the third isnt incarceration for life :D if you know what I mean "COSTS ABOUT 30 CENTS.

If that was the case you would notice society for some strange reason recovering and just getting better and better.

The criminal justice system is named so because thats who it benifits.

IF MY CAR EVER GETS STOLEN I WISH THIS ON THE CAR THIEF ALTHOUGH MY CAR WOULD BE SADLY MISSED BUT I HAVE INSURANCE :) .

Edited by Imtorqing
All repeat criminals should have this happen.

I wish all the best to foamer and hope that she or he can help a percentage but even she/he has to admit that atleast 70 percent are lost causes.

I see this everyday and cant help but feel discouraged as Police try to lock these idiots up and the Judges keep letting them out with slaps on the wrist.

I am more than happy to see them on their way to hell. :/

I dont see how locking them up is any better. It costs taxpayers around 65 to 70,000 a year to keep each one of these rsholes incarcerated.

Bring on Three strikes I say but the third isnt incarceration for life :D if you know what I mean "COSTS ABOUT 30 CENTS.

If that was the case you would notice society for some strange reason recovering and just getting better and better.

The criminal justice system is named so because thats who it benifits.

IF MY CAR EVER GETS STOLEN I WISH THIS ON THE CAR THIEF ALTHOUGH MY CAR WOULD BE SADLY MISSED BUT I HAVE INSURANCE :) .

Dont know about the 30 cents part..But make them earn their keep.Fix our roads,build new dams...Slavery type of thing is a better idea...repay society for the damage they have done

I stopped reading this thread because i thought i was going to get flamed again, but after working up the courage to have a peak, things seem to have cooled off :) calling everybody a dickhead probably wasn't the best way to start my post, especially as i have just paid for my qld membership, so will probably meet quite a few of you.

just to share with you some of my frustrations, and to show you where your tax dollars are going, i have another 14 year old that i am working with, who in the past 6 months has done $52 000 thousand dollars worth of damage to property ($34 000 to workers cars and roughly $18 000 damage to property). he hasn't even been charged by the organisation, instead he has been cautioned over and over again, with the mentality of "let's not give him a criminal record as it might ruin his future". And all those costs do not take into account extra staff hours that have been paid to work with this kid. At $40 per hour that we get paid, it adds up quick.

anyway, back to work tomorrow, after a few days off to chill at the gold coast. get my skyline back from east coast customs on friday, so at least there is a light at the end of the tunnel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...