Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Always had a soft spot for these:

10HSV_m_m.jpg

Some of them looked good in their paint schemes, shame most of them today are about 1" off the ground with 24"chromes and big doof doof stereos

They are usually the fake ones.

I know of an original that makes 600hp NA on avgas. :yes: with stock wheels!

Although it galls me to do this (R31's can beat anything....)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RA1wrroc34&rel=1

DR30 power!

Hooks

cool vid. it's interesting that the old Grp A DR30 race car does Tsukuba in 1.03 on slicks and the current gen bog stock GTR on road tyres does 1 min flat! man times have changed.

cool vid. it's interesting that the old Grp A DR30 race car does Tsukuba in 1.03 on slicks and the current gen bog stock GTR on road tyres does 1 min flat! man times have changed.

The current V35 does it in 60sec? Is that right? Mark and Russ were only scant seconds faster on semis and mega power with lightened car etc... Sounds too fast to me isnt it?

yep, the R35 GTR road car does tsukuba in between 1.00 and 1.02 depending on who's driving. mines have now done a 59 using their own suspension and exhaust and lightly tuned ECU (but still on road tyres!).

now you know why Mark and Russ wanted one when they saw the R35 at Tsukuba back in december. from memory it was doing 1.01 or 1.02s on the day straight out of the box!

yep, the R35 GTR road car does tsukuba in between 1.00 and 1.02 depending on who's driving. mines have now done a 59 using their own suspension and exhaust and lightly tuned ECU (but still on road tyres!).

So this year at Tsukuba the garages might as well show up with showroom stock V35s huh, kinda takes the joy out of it all really lol

cool vid. it's interesting that the old Grp A DR30 race car does Tsukuba in 1.03 on slicks and the current gen bog stock GTR on road tyres does 1 min flat! man times have changed.

bah. that thing was just cruising around. lets see a std road tyred R35 beat this!

2:17.16

what were the race prepped (free engine management, exhausts, suspension, brake upgrades, semi slicks, cages etc) Evo's running at the 12hr in qualifying? 2:30? on a much smoother, wider and faster Bathurst track than the old DR30 ran on. I doubt a standard R35 on road tyres is going to be any match for those times, let alone the old DR on slicks!

Edited by hrd-hr30
yeah it's crazy how fast they go with fancy computers and the like. will be even quicker once they get a hold of some good size semi slicks.

Yeah, its getting like F1 on the road. Except F1 are removing drivers aids now, as opposed to Nissan and Mitsubishi who give drivers aids... (pun intended)

See that Toyota might be bringing back the Supra? or some sort of Supra-style coupe with lots of pistons and typically, 2WD? Im constantly amazed that a company like Toyota with all their resources has never tried to actually compete with Nissan, Mitsubishi and to a lesser extent Honda when it came to the top-line sportscars (GTR, NSX) or 4WD high performance sedans (Evo).

The GTR has been around since Adam was a boy and they've never tried to counter it with their own version, and it's not like the GTR turned into a Mitsubishi 3000GT which sank like a stone. The GTR is world recognised and forever famous the world over. You can't buy that name-branding publicity yet Toyota's left those laurels on Nissans mantle-piece...

Always had a soft spot for these:

Some of them looked good in their paint schemes, shame most of them today are about 1" off the ground with 24"chromes and big doof doof stereos

Here ya go then, little bit of VL action

and an in-car of Grice too :D

Edited by Stupid Toyota
bah. that thing was just cruising around. lets see a std road tyred R35 beat this!

2:17.16

what were the race prepped (free engine management, exhausts, suspension, brake upgrades, semi slicks, cages etc) Evo's running at the 12hr in qualifying? 2:30? on a much smoother, wider and faster Bathurst track than the old DR30 ran on. I doubt a standard R35 on road tyres is going to be any match for those times, let alone the old DR on slicks!

Holy shit thats definatly 110%!

Don't forget the old mans school yard cruizer...one lap with a sound from the god's....nothing quite like a v12 at peek rev's.

want a lolly little boy!!!...lol

Sound from the God's belly rumbling cause he's hungry...

This will satisfy... and it isn't a Snickers though there are traces of nuts

I found these video's on Youtube of Alan Grice racing the

R31 GTS-R around 1988.

Part 1 -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiOnKKJjaWE...feature=related

Part 2 -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIyuo0wIUuY&feature=user

Part 3 -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Q9g3CTAZFw&feature=user

Part 4 where the R31 GTS-R breaks the lap record -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BylbtOgkw4Q...feature=related

Part 5 -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXKciAZ1ZIs&feature=user

Part 6 with Alan Grice passing the Cosworth in the R31 GTS-R -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ6jlHmySrI...feature=related

Edited by SKYPER

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...