Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, in the next few months i am tossing up between getting an R32 GT-R (I have always loved these, since Jim Richards & Mark Skaife used to race them) or an XR6 Turbo

I have seen a couple of threads about which mods to do first FMIC, Exhaust etc...

I would have at least $5k (probably closer to $10k) to spend on mods if i do get the GT-R. What would be advisable to do for under $10k and what kind of results would I achieve? Would it be wise to replace the stock turbo units?

Cheers guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205338-contemplating-getting-an-r32-gt-r/
Share on other sites

They are two completely different cars.

One will have a warranty, feel like disconnected boat with a stroker diesel.

The other will need constant money spent on it (if driven hard and regularly) Has a tourqless, short stroke motor and attracts the five-oh like flies to shite.

Check the dyno thread for the power / $ spent on mods your looking at.

Seriously, i don't think i could think of two different cars. The Fords are ECU locked and need one of those tricky CAPA thingos and have the build quality... well of an Australian built car.

Inversely, the BNR32 is a tuners dream, and as such, will never be as reliable / cheap to run as a newish TaxiCon.

Don't get me wrong, the boosted falcons are a good thang, but the attributes that would attract you to one, are at ends to a 18year old Japanese import, a GTR none the less.

Try and get a ride in a mild one, as someone correct me if im wrong, but a stock auto XR6 Turbo would KILL a lightly tuned GTR from a rolling start... and keep on doing it.

My biased view ... :yes:

Edited by GeeTR
i dunno bout that. i dragged a vy-ss that had 10k spend on it. my stock GTR sat next to him the whole time. this was on a drag strip by the way. street racing is illegal

That's cuz that is a holden mate :yes:

Spend $8k on an XR6T and ur looking at high 11's, nearly 400kW at flywheel.

Cheers for that rundown GeeTR

I have only ever had rides in GT-R's that were anything but mildly tuned! I dont think i have ever been in a stock one at all!

I think stock XR6T's run mid-high 13's, surely GT-R's are quicker than that

dont know where you are getting your info from but XR6 turbos run 14s.My old GTS4 has had many a doorhandle to doorhandle run with them.They are nothing superfast.A stock GTR should beat one.But it all depends on what you want the car for.A GTR would be pretty useless at towing a boat or comfortably seating 5 on a trip.

dont know where you are getting your info from but XR6 turbos run 14s.My old GTS4 has had many a doorhandle to doorhandle run with them.They are nothing superfast.A stock GTR should beat one.But it all depends on what you want the car for.A GTR would be pretty useless at towing a boat or comfortably seating 5 on a trip.

Definately not looking for towing a boat :yes: Just looking for a nice ride. I don't have a family, although i will be getting married in September.. She can have the family car when the young'n comes along.. I just want something to have some fun in!

According to the manufacturer:

BAII/BF F6 Typhoon = 4.9-5.5 0-100km/h, 12.7-13.2 1/4 mile

BA/BAII/BF GT = 5.3-5.8 0-100km/h, 13.3-13.7 1/4 mile

BA/BAII/BF XR8 = 5.7-6.0 0-100km/h, 13.6-14.0 1/4 mile

BA/BAII XR6 Turbo = 5.8-6.2 0-100km/h, 13.8-14.1 1/4 mile

Basically, just get an edit + CAI and your into high 12's in an XR6T

Edited by r32gtrboss

XR6 Sedan would be ok...how about a Typhoon? Seems like a lot of maniacs buy the utes and actually they are becoming the new VL, trying to bait me at the light deal lol

"but a stock auto XR6 Turbo would KILL a lightly tuned GTR from a rolling start... and keep on doing it." Not my lightly tuned GT-R...not even on their best day. Proved it

XR6 Sedan would be ok...how about a Typhoon? Seems like a lot of maniacs buy the utes and actually they are becoming the new VL, trying to bait me at the light deal lol

"but a stock auto XR6 Turbo would KILL a lightly tuned GTR from a rolling start... and keep on doing it." Not my lightly tuned GT-R...not even on their best day. Proved it

Phoons are bloody awesome, i just dont have enough dosh to get one :yes: I think they are circa $40k which is about $10k out of my budget. With my wedding and buying a house coming up, i need that $10k! lol

Just how 'lightly' is your GT-R tuned mate?

Ok with your future circumstances coming up then I would recommend the XR6 Turbo then. Sure its the same price range as the GTR however the XR6 is a newer fresher car.GTRs are getting old and maintenance is critical.If it hasnt already had an engine rebuild chances are it will need one soon.Thats when the big dollars start flying !!! As much of a GTR fanatic as I am, I would only recommend buying one if its a GTR or nothing type of affair. Many cars can be made to go like a rocket not just GTRs...hope that helps

what makes u think a rebuild on a xr6t is cheap?? last one i did was in excess of 6k. and that was just a standard rebuild.

as for xr6t is faster... lol yer ok :yes: my 200kw 180sx tore those things apart..

dont compare a race car with number plates to the titanic. numbers on paper are different to numbers in the real world.

im yet to see an xr6t STOCK pull of a 13sec pass @ calder.. yet ive seen plenty of noobie gtr drivers reel off very 13s and hi 12s with no mods...

As GeeTR said, two very different cars.

A diplomatic viewpoint...

r32 GTR - A known legend and a track weapon. However is becoming very old and very hard to find in reasonable condition. Expect to spend a fair amount maintaining such an old car and paying a high insurance premium. Really buy this car for the love of it.

XR6T - Newer generation car that is a glorified sedan with questionable build quality. Certainly some power and responds well to mods. Insurance may be similar but maintainence shouldn't be as high (due to age). Nice creature comforts.

In summary hard to compare, one is RWD and the other RW/AWD when needed. One has two doors the other 4. Plus the 18 year age difference. By the sounds of what YOU need I would go XR6T.

How about considering a 4 door R34GTT? Definitely closer to the mark to an XR6T.

Edited by SkyDragon

GTR is inherently a better performance car than the Falcon as they didn't have to compromise to build it and that's why they are still able to hold their own. that said, and not withstanding some reliability issues, if you just want something practical and quickish you probably can't go wrong with a Falcon. but seems like you're prepared to let wifey do the sedan thing so the GTR is a good bet as in 4 years time the Falcon will be an old Falcon and the GTR...is still a GTR.

Buy wisely and there are bargains to be had in terms of cars with rebuilt motors, steel turbos etc. Buy impatiently and you can end up with a money pit. You might need to spend a little to get it sorted so everything works, remove hicas etc and get attesa working properly, but there is enough knowledge on here with people going through the wringer with theirs that the challenges aren't as bad as they used to be.

im yet to see an xr6t STOCK pull of a 13sec pass @ calder.. yet ive seen plenty of noobie gtr drivers reel off very 13s and hi 12s with no mods...

Really?

I know a few guys who have pulled 13.7-13.9 at WSID in stock auto xr6t's

I love my GTR's.. I suppose it's really going to come down to how much the wedding costs and how much the repayments on the mortgage will be.. lol. I will probably just keep trolling tradingpost.com.au and see if a nice example of a GT-R does pop up.

I appreciate the non-biased comments, i was half expecting people to say how good the GT-R is and how shit the XR6T is, lol.

So any tips when looking to buy a GT-R?

Obviously from what people have said in here is to make sure the engine has been rebuilt, what else?

I saw a nice 92 GT-R with a rebuilt engine and new turbos for $21k only 91000 on ODO

Edited by r32gtrboss

Keets / Bumble - know what your saying, buuut, I still stick by my comment :yes:

A drag race, where you know its coming then yes, R / 200jiggabang 180sx wins; drop 2 gears, bang bang - done.

In real life, your forgetting though, those XR6 Maniacs are sneaky tradies. With their stock exhausts, they creep up so quick; your more likely to hear them coming from the blaring AC-DC or rear muffler turbulence :) My point is that you can mash the throttle at any speed in one, and they just go. So on the street, in real life they are quicker then a light tune GTR. I don't mean the Jap standard of light tune either. I mean boost, filters, zhaust.

Rem too, a stock XR6 will belt out just a 'few' more 14sec 1/4 then a stock GTR will 12.5's :D

not even on their best day. Proved it

I thrashed a stock XR6 for months, and pumped quiet a few stock 'looking' R's. Like i said, while there still deciding what to do, what gear to chuck it into, how much boost to dial up onda Uleh EBC, the FalcoShite has already kicked down and laying 500nm (on the track of course)

Edited by GeeTR

lol @ pumped a few R's... u sure they were R's?

and i DONT believe u have tracked ur xr6t because im a regular tracker and an xr6t doesnt even keep up with my shitty civic around a track. its not about power either, its the fact that theyre are barges.

The gtr dude might be thinkin about what gear he wants, but his still in front :yes:

Ive ran many xr6ts, stock or worked, its always been the same outcome. They lose. Even those silly "my xr6t makes 400rwkw" wankers lose and i was making a lazy 300awkw... as for ur 500nm... mine made over 800nm the dyno :D

And she feels it too hahah

Edited by Bumblebee
According to the manufacturer:

BAII/BF F6 Typhoon = 4.9-5.5 0-100km/h, 12.7-13.2 1/4 mile

BA/BAII/BF GT = 5.3-5.8 0-100km/h, 13.3-13.7 1/4 mile

BA/BAII/BF XR8 = 5.7-6.0 0-100km/h, 13.6-14.0 1/4 mile

BA/BAII XR6 Turbo = 5.8-6.2 0-100km/h, 13.8-14.1 1/4 mile

12.7 from a stock typhoon. i dont think so, more like mid to high 13's.

Dont get a 4spd auto or 5sp manualas they are shit and wont handle much of a power increase without causing you dramas , only the 6 speed man or auto are anygood. Always have problems with there rear ends, diff, drive shafts, diff bushes etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...