Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, its time i servcied my R33 Gts-t and i was wondering if any of u guys reccomend a really good OIL and Coolant for my car? i donno whats in there Now, and there are so many diff brands on the market! what is the most commonly used and most effective for Gtst's? / or jap imports.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20553-what-oil-and-coolant/
Share on other sites

The factory spec is 7.5W/30, but I've used both 10W-60 and 5W-30 synthetic with no problems at all. The 10W-60 is too thick though, and robs power from your engine with no real extra protection benefits. I would use the 10W-60 if the rings were a bit worn, but if not, then something thinner.

Keep in mind that any oil designed for high revving 4cyl engines is also good for Skylines, even though it's 6cyl. The reason being it's a small 6cyl engine and revs quite high. The pistons in an RB25 are actually smaller than those in an SR20.

A lot of people use 0W-40 with excellent results. Just whatever you get, stick to something semi or fully synthetic and you should be right.

As for coolant, just a good brand that's designed for alloy engines. I've got some Nulon concentrated stuff ready to go in. Mix it with distilled water if it's not a pre-mix to make sure you don't get weird metals in your engine.

For more detailed answers, take Ronin's advice and search :P

i use penrite 15w60

i like the fact that it goes up to 60, as it revvvs lots and i like the fact that i am protected even at 7000rpm!

and for coolants, make sure u use anti-freeze/anti-boil not just the normal stuff. this prevents corrosion as well as working well. 50:50 ratio works wonders...

Guest RedLineGTR

Been using 5-40 Motul 8100 seems okay...was using Shell Helix Ultra 5-40w with useing the shell oil...the engine ran cooler the engine temp was lower and because of that the coolant temperature goes lower than it ever did with motul..after this i think i'll stick with shell...unless i wanna spend $100 for redline oils.

I like Formula R too. Currently using 5W-30 but used 10W-60 before that with no ill effects other than losing some power. It's not the best synthetic oil out there but still excellent IMO. If you change your oil often (5000km or so) then you can get by with the cheaper stuff. It's only $50 for 5 litres anyway (5W-30).

Gunner, the numbers are the viscosity numbers. The first one is the cold (starting) temperature viscosity, and the second number is the hot (operating) temperature viscosity. I'm not sure at what exact temperatures the numbers are rated at or what they directly translate to, but generally speaking a "10" is fairly thin, and thin oil (cold weight) is required on modern cars, especially with turbos.

It can go down to 0, which is ultra-thin. This seems to be ok with Skylines with engines in good condition. I wouldn't want to go any thicker than 15 or so for the cold viscosity in a Skyline.

The second number is less important. It can be thick or thin (to an extent) but most Skylines are happy in the 30-40 range. Any thicker than this and you tend to lose power.

Thicker grades are generally only for engines with worn rings. The thicker oil doesn't get past the rings as easily and you burn less oil. If your engine is in good nic you should be able to get by with a fairly thin (30-40) oil.

Thicker oil is also required in extremely powerful engines. I don't know where to draw the line, but it's not at my car's power output (approximately 200rwkw).

RedLineGTR, the 5W-30 isn't too thin at all. It's designed for high revving 4 cylinder cars, including the SR20 engine, which has larger pistons than the Skyline's. So you could even say that the RB series of engines are more of a 4 cylinder engine than an SR20 :D The factory spec for Skyline oil is 7.5W-30. There are plenty of people running 0W-40 with no problems so obviously you can go lower than this (cold weight) without any problems.

Edit: If you are burning oil in your engine, or you have buckets of it in your catch can, you probably need thicker oil (50-60 or so). If the engine is tight as a drum, the thinner stuff (30-40) is fine. Even with 5W-30 oil in my engine there wasn't a drop coming out of my crankcase breather for over 2000km.

thanks for the help.

Im currently using turbolight oil.. seems to be great. i get good power from the car 140rwk's ( sr20 ) i think i one in there is about 10 - 40. seems to be fine, thank's for the info.

so i could put something a little thinner in there and the engine would be just as happy. ??

Gunner, if you are not burning any oil and don't have much blow-by from the crankcase (check the inside of your intake, or oil catch can if you have one) then the thinner oil will be just as good. Better even, because there will be less drag on your engine internals and you should get slightly better power and economy (that is the main point of using the thinnest oil that your engine will tolerate).

Do a compression test on your cylinders if you want to be doubly sure. If it's all good then 5W-30 will be fine.

people keep saying that you lose power if u use an oil with a high temp viscosity greater than 40.

what i want to know is: has anyone actually moved to a thicker oil then thought holy sh1t i can actually feel a power loss. Or, is this just something someone said and everyone agreed with because they want to look like the know stuff (happens a lot from what ive seen)?

WazR32GTSt, I can say the opposite. I was using 10W-60 oil then switched to 5W-30, and the engine felt more free-revving at the top. Not by a huge amount, but noticable. My fuel economy also improved by around 0.3 to 0.5L/100km.

There is no doubt that thinner oil will give you better economy and power. It's just physics! Everything that adds drag to your engine will reduce its power. Thicker oil creates more drag than thin oil. You can't go too thin though or else it would all drain down the gaps in your rings and not lubricate properly and/or burn excessively. That's why as your engine wears, you need to use thicker oil.

There is generally no harm in using oil that's too thick. Aside from the cold weight - if it's too thick it won't reach the upper parts of your engine and turbo quick enough and create excessive wear on cold starts. But if you use oil that's too thick for the condition of your engine you will be sacrificing power without any extra engine protection (see my exception above about uber-powerful engines).

Thinner oil is free power. Thick oil doesn't provide better protection unless your rings are worn.

thanks mate

i know by the physics of it that thinner oil should be better for power but i was looking to see if it was a difference that was actually noticable or not.

has anyone else had this experience?

btw, dineth: i hope this isn't hijacking your thread as i thought it was relevant to the topic. if it is i will start a new thread...

mate I used MOBIL S semi sinthetic 10W 40

quite good result. Motul 10W40 full synth is good

value. the only thing you'll get out of 0W or 5W oils

is some fuel consumption.

bear in mind factory standard when all is new is 7,5W

so as your car ages you should go a little thicker,

but all dependant on your engine age, kms etc etc

10-15W seems a good choice ...

Hope it helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...