Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I have recently installed a catch-can to my 26 and have since had all sorts of weird hesitation / missfiring / random stalling.

Heres how I have it plummed up (From left to right)

Pipe from plenum area to drivers side breather: Left in place

Both left and Right side breathers are now piped into catch can

Pipe from passanger side cam breather to turbo intake pipes: Blocked

Now from what I know, the pipe from the plenum side of things only opens on vacume, on boost it closes up, which is consistent with my problems only happening off boost. What I think is happening is that air is being sucked through the catch can into the intake manifold off boost and hence not going through the AFM's, causing my missfire etc issues? Most of the time, if the car missfires or gives flat spots, clutch in and rev's will fix it, or getting some boost into it will fix it.

What I want to know is, if I put a 3rd line from the top of my catch can back into my intake piping, where the old pipe used to go, will this fix the issue and will the catch can still work?

Thanks in advance

Ian

PS I have dodgy paint diagriams of what I mean, let me know if you need them...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205534-rb26-catch-can-piping/
Share on other sites

Is the can sealed, or does it vent to atmosphere?

If it is sealed (which it should be, so it is an oil / air separator), I suggest you plumb it as:

Rocker vents -> catch can 'in', then catch can 'out' -> turbo intake

yes its because you have a breather on your catch can causing it to suck through that and run lean. Either pull out the pvc valve and block it off and have it a full venting to atmosphere setup which is illegal, or plumb the breather back into the inlet piping before the turbo.

The can is empty however, theres nothing in there. Will it still work?
Try stuffing some steel wool in the can. It will act as a "seed" for the oil vapour to condense around. After all, the purpose of the can is to remove oil vapour from the air.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...