Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey i hav a 93 s1 r33 current mods are: ase FMIC, hks 3.5" cat bak zorst, walbro 500hp fp, pod, standard turbo as far as im aware, running @ 11psi and standard ecu. My car made a healthy 221.1rwkw on the dyno at turbo tune. After speaking to a few ppl they think that its immpossible to make that sort of power with the standard turbo. The only thing i could think of is mayb my turbo is hi-flowed?? coz its def not bigger than the standard t3 :( just wanted to kno ppls thoughts on this and if any1 has a similar setup getting similar kw's??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206339-is-this-possible/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

it is possible.

A lot of people cant see how my car has made 180 odd on stock 8 psi (RB25 S2 turbo) with stock ecu, but it has done so on more than one occasion.

there's lot's of variables to consider, Healthy as engine, happy dyno (Read: dyno producing higher numbers, although not saying this is the case), possible highflow, dyno room temps, tuning, or simply a freak engine.

At the end of the day though, a dyno is a tuning tool, and nothing more. Dyno figures are nothing more than bragging rights, so be happy with the dyno sheets saying 221KW's and tell everyone to shut the f**k up.

Edited by R31 drift pig

bish33,

Bring it down to the dyno day on the 8th of march and see how it compared to others on the day.

Typically on the boostworx dyno r33's with similiar mods pull 190-200rwkw. With an adj. exh. cam gear around 210.

Even playing field; same dyno operator, same strapping down technique, same dyno. :yes:

Did you get a copy of the dyno sheet?

Scan it and put it up here.

I've been told that if they set up the temp, pressure etc incorrectly then you can get high figures (sounds like this is the case with yours)

Drift Pig is correct that dynos are really for tuning not true figures, but if callabrated they should be close to the mark.

I have many more mods and only make 30 extra rwkw, perhaps your ecu has been modified, or you have a high flow, but if not I doubt the 221rwkw figure is accurate.

My R32GTR made 199rwkw in nearly stock form with after market muffler , pod filters and a chiped ecu, so my thought's are that it is not an accurate dyno figure.

My old seies 2 R33gts25t made 135rwkw with only a muffler on it. Mark at Tillbrooks said that that was a perfect reading for a stock motor. (should be about 185kws at the motor)

Just my thought's anyway.

Hope it helps answer your question.

30rwkw doesn't sound like a lot but factor in the auto + your mid range would rip his to pieces making the acceleration difference look more like 50-60rwkw. :yes:

I agree, but the reading sounds way too high for a stock motor.

Either there are more mods than stated or the dyno is high.

I dont believe in the "freak engine" theory as its way outside a blueprinted (all specs are spot on) range of performance. (and i assume this isnt a recently rebuilt motor)

bish33.

What afr's is it running up around peak power?

My bets the afr's are spot on or a tad lean. Which indicates with a stock ecu the fuel pump is on its last legs.

Give it 6months it will continue to lean out more so and we will hear of how your rebuilding the motor due to broken ring lands. :S

Post the dyno sheet with afr's so we can see what state of tune it is in.

it is possible.

how?

ive never seen 200+ out of a stock r33 ecu?

they cant be remapped like the r32 ect. thats why most people go safc or pfc.

this is the point im trying to make, maybe i should have been clearer.

how?

ive never seen 200+ out of a stock r33 ecu?

they cant be remapped like the r32 ect. thats why most people go safc or pfc.

this is the point im trying to make, maybe i should have been clearer.

Wasnt saying anything about the ecu's themselves, moreso that a setup like that can produce numbers like that. Ive seen it. My engine makes 180 on 8 psi and stock ecu. Most need a remap and more boost to achieve that. Admittedly that was running a tad lean, but not dangerous. Even though it was a tad lean, still makes more power than it really should. My engine also has SFA km's on it, and was also out of an auto front cut. Some setups will make more power than others, fact of life. Not every setup is the same.

And they CAN be remapped. Utter B.S that that they cant. Although the cost of it is almost triple a standard remap, hence why everyone goes PFC/SAFC etc, But when a R33 ECU is remapped it's better than a PFC (Knock Control etc)

(Ben Awaits SimonR32 to come a-running and say the same :) )

At the end of the Day, who Give a shit? A tuner can make my 180 odd kw RB20 read 400KW's at the wheels If I so asked him to.

Bish 33

We cant tell you much at all without a dyno sheet, and if you REALLY want to know the answer, take your car to someone like Boostworx, Turbo Tune or ATS, and get them to look at the turbo and have your question answered once and for all.

Edited by R31 drift pig

yeah i think i said the exact same thing in another thread somewhere... once the 33 ecu is remapped, its a better ecu then a Power FC thats for sure.. however most go the PFC for ease of use and more tuners.

Theres a few ppl doing 33 remaps now... but for me, the 20 ecu + a RPM switch works a treat (i havent hooked up an rpm switch yet but its possible to do so that you can retain the VCT)

As for the original poster... while nothing is impossible.. its highly unlikely the stock ecu will allow you to run anything more then 10 psi without some form of rich and retard, and there fore limiting the power output. So this suggest that you may well have a SAFC hidden away uunder the dash, or possible a japanese remapped/chipped 33 ecu... i'd pull the kick panel off and look at the loom for spliced wires and have a look at the ecu and see if theres anything non standard about it.

the stock turbos do however make good power. as mentioned mine made 220 rwkw on 13 psi, with a remapped 20 ecu, no VCT and bulk torque and responce.. i was really happy with it

post-43484-1203210660_thumb.jpg

My fuel pump is only 3months old so i cant see how its leaning out, turbo tune hav done all my work i hav had my car tuned 3 times in the last 3 months so im sure if it was leaning out they would hav told me coz thats why a got a new fp in the 1st place my car was gettin .8 of litre at idle wen its meant to get 3Ls. The dyno was not on shoot out mode and he did put all the right factors in the comp b4 running my car on the dyno i do not believe this was an incorrect readout, as i do not kno much about the history of my car mayb it has more mods that i am unware of, and a way to find out would be to pull my engine down i wont be doin that lol.And i would be happy to take it to the dyno day, curious to see wat it gets on a different dyno :)

Edited by bish33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...