Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thought this would be a good idea :D

if you have a part number for a commonly failing/modded part list it below.

(I'll update this post to reflect it - saves digging.)

Part number ------------- Part -------- Desc.

80501-AM80A -> left side door catch assembly - coupe. includes cables and door lock actuator.

80500-AM81A -> right side door catch assembly - coupe. includes cables and door lock actuator.

80731-CD00A ->Passenger side (LHS) window motor + regulator- coupe

B61F0-AL500 -> Clear front indicator lenses for Sedan

H0564-C9922 -> Master key blank:note that this is the key with lock/unlock button in handle, no boot release on key

Edited by Chris Rogers

passenger side (LHS) window motor + regulator

part no: 80731-CD00A

this needs to be changed if your window is intermittantly not working and the door needs to be tapped or closed hard in order for the window to work

when you change the motor, you have to re-set the window motor so it knows where the top is:

- take the door trim off

- close the door and sit inside the car (the door needs to be closed as there is a sensor)

- peel back the black sticker almost right in the middle of the door to reveal the reset button

- close the window completely

- press and hold the button

- open the window manually (using the first click not the second click)

- when the window has fully opened release the switch then release the button

- check that the auto-up now works!

this re-set procedure is also useful if your window has the issue of winding half-way down after it hits the top

cheers,

Warren

Door Lock actuators for V35 Coupe:

I have just recieved today from Japan the lock actuators. It seems like Nissan has changed the design somewhat - it's not apparent from the outside and created new part numbers. Here is the verbatim text from my contact in Japan:

> Parts number has been changed.

> V35 Nissan Skyline

> 80500-AM813 -> 80500-AM81A

> 80501-AM813 -> 80501-AM81A

He confirmed the initial part numbers from my VIN and the revised numbers are exactly what Nissan NZ had told me - they wanted over twice the cost I paid though.. I've fitted the RHS one and I'm sorry but this late at night I cant tell which is the left or right - you should order both anyway! I'll create a seperate thread with contact details for the Japanese guy - he was really good to deal with.

Hope this helps someone....

most car might have flat / dead battery from sitting in the docks for too long.

Found a good replacement Century Battery NS60LS

Blue colour has flat top (no yellow cover sticking out) and has 2 terminal sizes, use the small ones and keep the rubber cover on the large terminals on.

Dimension lengthxwidth (23cmx13cm) very similar to the old battery except it is 1cm shorter (18cm only), so you'll have to screw down the bracket holder tighter until it reaches the lower battery height and keep it down. Alternatively put a 1cm thick spacer under the battery either a solid hardwood or hard rubber to get the battery to the correct height.

About 400 CCA (Cold Crank Amps), cost $159 at Autobarn or $144 with Century promo of $15 cash back for trading in any of your old battery (they'll recycle it). It's probably cost less if I look harder but what the heck, it's Labour Day holiday and I can't be bother driving around town to find cheapest price, just wanted to get it done.

  • 3 weeks later...

Not sure if this counts as a commonly failing part, but it seems to be a common mod:

- Clear front indicator lenses for Sedan: B61F0-AL500

Again not really a failure part but if your (2001 - mid 2003 I think?) car arrives from Japan with only 1 key:

- Master key blank: H0564-C9922, note that this is the key with lock/unlock button in handle, no boot release on key. So I think this only applies to the pre-facelift 2001 - mid 2003 models only with the 'doggy door' boot (the ones which have the boot open button on the boot itself)

somewhat off-topic so please delete if inappropriate: are 350gt reliable/quality-built/made of quality parts?

It seems it has many common parts that fail. and replacing those parts won't be as easy and cheap as it probably needs to be imported from japan.

thank you

not to be rude - part numbers only please. I'm tryting to make a list of parts that break/wearout out are modded easily.

bear in mind some of these cars are 6-7 yrs old now and some things do break over time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...