Jump to content
SAU Community

V35 Parts List (common Failure/modded Parts)


Recommended Posts

thought this would be a good idea :D

if you have a part number for a commonly failing/modded part list it below.

(I'll update this post to reflect it - saves digging.)

Part number ------------- Part -------- Desc.

80501-AM80A -> left side door catch assembly - coupe. includes cables and door lock actuator.

80500-AM81A -> right side door catch assembly - coupe. includes cables and door lock actuator.

80731-CD00A ->Passenger side (LHS) window motor + regulator- coupe

B61F0-AL500 -> Clear front indicator lenses for Sedan

H0564-C9922 -> Master key blank:note that this is the key with lock/unlock button in handle, no boot release on key

Edited by Chris Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

passenger side (LHS) window motor + regulator

part no: 80731-CD00A

this needs to be changed if your window is intermittantly not working and the door needs to be tapped or closed hard in order for the window to work

when you change the motor, you have to re-set the window motor so it knows where the top is:

- take the door trim off

- close the door and sit inside the car (the door needs to be closed as there is a sensor)

- peel back the black sticker almost right in the middle of the door to reveal the reset button

- close the window completely

- press and hold the button

- open the window manually (using the first click not the second click)

- when the window has fully opened release the switch then release the button

- check that the auto-up now works!

this re-set procedure is also useful if your window has the issue of winding half-way down after it hits the top

cheers,

Warren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Door Lock actuators for V35 Coupe:

I have just recieved today from Japan the lock actuators. It seems like Nissan has changed the design somewhat - it's not apparent from the outside and created new part numbers. Here is the verbatim text from my contact in Japan:

> Parts number has been changed.

> V35 Nissan Skyline

> 80500-AM813 -> 80500-AM81A

> 80501-AM813 -> 80501-AM81A

He confirmed the initial part numbers from my VIN and the revised numbers are exactly what Nissan NZ had told me - they wanted over twice the cost I paid though.. I've fitted the RHS one and I'm sorry but this late at night I cant tell which is the left or right - you should order both anyway! I'll create a seperate thread with contact details for the Japanese guy - he was really good to deal with.

Hope this helps someone....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most car might have flat / dead battery from sitting in the docks for too long.

Found a good replacement Century Battery NS60LS

Blue colour has flat top (no yellow cover sticking out) and has 2 terminal sizes, use the small ones and keep the rubber cover on the large terminals on.

Dimension lengthxwidth (23cmx13cm) very similar to the old battery except it is 1cm shorter (18cm only), so you'll have to screw down the bracket holder tighter until it reaches the lower battery height and keep it down. Alternatively put a 1cm thick spacer under the battery either a solid hardwood or hard rubber to get the battery to the correct height.

About 400 CCA (Cold Crank Amps), cost $159 at Autobarn or $144 with Century promo of $15 cash back for trading in any of your old battery (they'll recycle it). It's probably cost less if I look harder but what the heck, it's Labour Day holiday and I can't be bother driving around town to find cheapest price, just wanted to get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Not sure if this counts as a commonly failing part, but it seems to be a common mod:

- Clear front indicator lenses for Sedan: B61F0-AL500

Again not really a failure part but if your (2001 - mid 2003 I think?) car arrives from Japan with only 1 key:

- Master key blank: H0564-C9922, note that this is the key with lock/unlock button in handle, no boot release on key. So I think this only applies to the pre-facelift 2001 - mid 2003 models only with the 'doggy door' boot (the ones which have the boot open button on the boot itself)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

somewhat off-topic so please delete if inappropriate: are 350gt reliable/quality-built/made of quality parts?

It seems it has many common parts that fail. and replacing those parts won't be as easy and cheap as it probably needs to be imported from japan.

thank you

not to be rude - part numbers only please. I'm tryting to make a list of parts that break/wearout out are modded easily.

bear in mind some of these cars are 6-7 yrs old now and some things do break over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any chance you can get a Nistune board installed instead and set the speed limit to whatever your tires can handle?
    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...