Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, to cut a long story short my car had a turbo timer when it left Japan but when I collected it from compliance it didn't have one - but the harness is still there. So rather than point fingers and end up wasting my time and everyone elses time i'd like to know what unit I used to have and replace it.

The wiring harness is still there so rather than rip it out and start again, why not use it?

Picture is here - apologies for the low-res nature.

5.jpg

I'm *guessing* it's an Apexi unit but i'm open to suggestion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208192-what-turbo-timer-did-i-have/
Share on other sites

bit hard to tell but to me that looks like an old Blitz FATT. don't worry you are not missing much. to be honest I would just go without one. my GTR has one, my silvia has one, my legacy GT doesn't and is much better off! and no, I didn't buy or install any of them.

BLITZ%20FATT%20X%20SILVER.jpg

  • 3 months later...

Thread grave dig time!

As it turns out It was a Blitz ASTT X - It has a problem too:

After the car has been running and I turn the key from ON to ACC the time kicks in like it should, however if I turn the key from ACC to OFF the engine shuts down but the timer keeps counting down regardless. I've checked the harness under the dash and it all appears to be in order and i'm stuck for ideas on what else could be wrong with it.

Ideas anyone?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...