Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...l&hl=GT2871

225rwkW @ 13psi. Responsive, torquey, easy to drive. Good upgrade, but I don't know how it compares to the HKS 2530 as I haven't driven a Skyline so equipped. Anyone who's driven mine is never unimpressed though.

Best suggestion I would have if you went to the 2871 is to acquire the Garrett unit and transplant the HKS turbine housing onto it to make it all bolt on easily.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-3688189
Share on other sites

Hmmmm.. Im getting 229rwkw @ 13psi with my 2530 at the moment and was looking to upgrade to the 2781 for 280~rwkw. Doesn't this turbo rate much higher than 225kw? I thought around 280-300??

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...rison_sheet.htm states that the turbo is rated from 250 (186kw) to 475hp (354kw)

I understand what you are saying about the housing. Either i get a stock turbo housing or use the HKS one?

Edited by SkyDragon
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-3688221
Share on other sites

There are three compressor trim specifications for the 2871. I'd say that for any of them the turbine would be the stumbling block from a mass flow perspective if you wanted better than 250rwkW. I'd say your HKS housing would provide a definite flow advantage. Buy a complete Garrett turbocharger, remove the T25 flanged turbine housing, and swap in the T3 flanged HKS housing. If you ran the 52 trim version, then you would have created a GT-RS.

Without getting into any of the max power debates, the 2871 is a good unit, but a 48 trim may not be a massive step forwards from the HKS unit you're currently running. Also maybe not quite the right spec you'd want if chasing 280rwkW. Something out of the HKS Pro S range, or a Garrett GT30 IW based unit would be my preference for that type of output.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-3688387
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Pulling up and old thread but with a related question -

I have a new 2871r and HKS 2530 housings.

My plan is to use the 2871 (GT-RS spec - 52 trim, 0.6a/r) with the HKS 0.64 T3 exhaust housing.

Is there a chance I will run into compressor surge issues on an rb25?

Has anyone done this and had good results?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5033898
Share on other sites

Considering you've got the same spec as a GT-RS, look at the results others have achieved with them.

Expect good results on-road, and don't worry about surge with either the 48 or 52 trim cartridges. The larger 56T would probably warrant use of a larger turbine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5035054
Share on other sites

so if you have the RB specific HKS GTRS kit can you confirm what AR the T3 rear housing is? not that i dont trust HKS but id be a lil :) if its a .63

yet from what ive seen its such a gun turbo to have onroad.... guaranteed 250rwkw and massive area under the curve... excellent power delivery too.. Ooooh so tempting

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5037468
Share on other sites

so if you have the RB specific HKS GTRS kit can you confirm what AR the T3 rear housing is? not that i dont trust HKS but id be a lil :) if its a .63

yet from what ive seen its such a gun turbo to have onroad.... guaranteed 250rwkw and massive area under the curve... excellent power delivery too.. Ooooh so tempting

OF COURSE it's gonna be .63 or thereabouts, especially knowing HKS generally put quite small housings on turbos. No point putting a T3 .82 housing on a little turbo like that IMO.

The GT3071R is a much more efficient turbo AND comes already with a T3 flange so will bolt on to stock manifold with a spacer plate and either weld external gate flange to stock manifold or get an I/W turbine housing. Instead of making 250rwkw on 18-20psi like a 2871, u might make 250 on only 1 bar and have potential for more power down the track.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5037593
Share on other sites

really quite pointless putting a 0.64 AR rear housing on, will eventually just choke the whole lot.

you have an RB, i'd really not be worried too much about the 64 rear.

I'll be buying a 2871R with a 52 trim front and a 0.86 rear for my SR20. the lag difference is really nominal between them, and if you're really worried about lag, just slap some bigger cams in and you'll move your boost threshold up another 200-400rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5039091
Share on other sites

really quite pointless putting a 0.64 AR rear housing on, will eventually just choke the whole lot.

you have an RB, i'd really not be worried too much about the 64 rear.

I'll be buying a 2871R with a 52 trim front and a 0.86 rear for my SR20. the lag difference is really nominal between them, and if you're really worried about lag, just slap some bigger cams in and you'll move your boost threshold up another 200-400rpm.

The issue with a 2871r is more the turbine size being too small to power the 71mm compressor more so than the housing size. Consensus amongst sr20 people is that the .64 is the housing to use - the .86 doesnt deliver on an sr20. The HKS gt-rs uses a .64 housing on their sr20 kit so this is an indication of what works best.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5039194
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...