Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i have a new petrol navara, great tow car power and speed wise good for 150 kph odd with trailer behind! lol

but absolutely sh!t house for fuel consumption! :D

why'd you buy a petrol one? i assume your talking about the d40 models?

my old man had a diesal d40. 2.5ltr 4 cylinder diesal. GREAT car seeing over 650 from a tank when driving in the city. fuel consumption can go down below the 9 ltr per 100km average on highway driving. consumption barely changed an with my old sil80 and a trailer you almost would notice it was there.

the old saying goes if your gonna tow go diesel

man, some good replys. thats given me some good ideas. i hear u gary re: the 4wd is needed in muddy situations. im still looking arround though. the ordfay sounds like the best option so far.

it seems as though the 2.6 petrol mazda bravo wont cut the mustard without some extra heavy duty work done to the rear end. not to mention load bareing tyres. found out it was easy enough to go out and buy a 2.5 tonne tow bar and assembly 2nd hand easily enough for the bravo though.

i was being told by a hard to understand serbian fellow at work today that the lpg systems on cars need to have checkups regularly. he says that once a year isnt good enough and that most people dont even do it that often. he's an ex taxi driver. he said that their cars were inspected on a 3 month basis. i dont know how true that story is re: road cars.

how often do AU fords need a rebuild? id expect them to go to 500,000klm no probs with regular oil changes and being treated right. all of the ones in my price range are at the 200,000klm mark.

yeah dunc go diesel ! we dont see anymore than 300/350 kay when towing on 80 litre tank!

spencer and I use his navara STR turbo diesel. it is awesome to tow with. it's a 4 door with 5 usable seats, has a hard top for the tray (down side is limits storage badly, upside is it locks) and has towed the GT3 cup car, my GTR, his group NC Alfa and dozens and dozens of others over the last couple of years. it even fit my big ass sony LCD tv in the back (just!). also being turbo diesel we cranked up the boost a bit and got a chip for it too. goes pretty well now but fuel consumption is not exactly stellar. but it can tow at a pretty rapid pace easy well past 110. :banana: chirps seconds too.

got the petrol , because it goes like a rocket and i can deal with the fuel economy.

also i didnt like the noisy diesel and didnt want a manual (the auto diesel was twice as noisy, always reving on the convertor)

  • 2 weeks later...

I've towed most of my working life and tried them all, Utes are ok but there is the afore mentioned security and lack of passenger room. Landcruisers are good too, Just not as bombproof as toyota would have you believe.

The best tow vehicle I have used and still use is the Nissan patrol.

I have owned the 3 litre variant, the 2.8 litre td jobbie, the 4.2 petrol and my current worker is the 4.8 petrol.

They all performed a stellar job, even the smaller engined units worked well above their weight and both ran up many hundreds of thousands of kays before i moved them on.

The 4.8 laughs at any load I care to pull with it. It likes a drink but that has been minimised with some custom pipework. an ecu and a dyno. Its big, comfy. power to burn and refuses to fail. (it will also tow a loaded car trailer faster than that too Russ :D )

The other advantage to using 4b's is the weight over the front axle. rwd utes etc are ok but still subject to rock steer even on a well set up balanced trailer package. You start hitting some undulating road and the weight transfer to and from the front of the tow vehicle is far more pronounced in the rwd. The heavier fronted 4wd virtually eliminate this phenomina.

The only other option that I can see is the even bigger ford/chev pickup truck style vehicles but cost becomes a real limiting factor there.

  • 2 weeks later...

I have the 2200kg tow kit put onto my VZ V6 commadore sedan and it tows great, probally does abot 15ltrs/100klms with the car on and can sit on 110klm/h very easily.

Even going up Mooney Mooney it sits on 100klm although reving the guts out of it.

Big boot for the tool box and jack bt and pieces and luggage, rear seat for the passengers and usally put spare wheels in the car that is being towed.

I used to have a VS commadore V6 which also did a stellar job but recomend getting the tow kit with the bags which i have in the VZ as you can lift the rear of the car up so it is not dragging it's arse on the ground.

You could pick up a second hand commadore for fairly cheap so maybe this is an option (could go a station wagon if you want).

Matt

if you get a navara, dont get one of the newer shape. theyre faarked

if anything, get a D22, nissan brought them back because the new was no good

new D22 runs the patrol 3L diesel

or something like a patrol, you can get them in 4.2L turbo diesel (ST-6 i think?)

what wrong with the d40 model (new shape) i know of at least 3 (one being my parent's that i drive regulary) that haven't had any real issues at all? all are used for towing and four wheel driving and just general town driving?

thier only downfall is they are pretty big and lack of ground clearance. but you don't buy a new 4wd to go do harcore four wheel driving do you

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry had a bit of a week and haven't had heaps of time to follow this, so apologies if I've missed something - any chance of showing a log with the rpm, turbo speed, MAP, and wgdc all in one view? Definitely an "interesting" problem, and while it's definitely worth noting that there was a similar issue with the twins I'd not completely put all bets on the root cause being the same thing.  Keep an open mind, follow the data.
    • I built this engine approximately 12 years ago so my own head (brain) is a little grey on the exact hardware in the RB head, however what I recall is. Stock RB25 NEO TURBO Intake Camshaft HKS 260 degree Exhaust Camshaft (R34 GTR) RB25 NEO Turbo Springs  I ported/removed the exhaust stud humps found in the RB25 head so theres less turbulence but it wasn't ported/polished properly, just a hump removal. I've attached two pictures of the before and after to illustrate.     The ECU gets its boost reference from the nipple on the rear of the head on the intake side, behind the fuel rail. The wastegate gets its boost reference from a nipple on the cooler pipe immediately after the comp cover.  Could a decent pressure drop across the intercooler cause the wastegate to be seeing a higher PSI than what the ECU is seeing, and thus it can't control it accurately and quick enough?   We ran a line to the actuator and watched it open and close using an air compressor, while we didn't have a gauge on the line to see when it was cracking open, it was opening smoothly.  I just removed the gate now and even though the documentation says you need to open it in a vice due to preload (which I did), there wasn't any preload on the cap, which is something we noticed straight out of the box as well when new. This silver cap internally is threaded to the actuator rod that runs out the bottom of the straightgate. Not sure how I'm supposed to get this spring out to be frank.. Potentially but everyone else doesn't appear to have to stop at 500kw because of 6boosts design.  I would, but I think I'm getting to that point where if I'm going to do the head and make another 100kw, then I'm going to need a fancy gearbox and quite a few other things and 10k becomes 20k becomes 30k within a few months. I'm not necessarily sold on the idea just yet that the head is restrictive at 4000rpm (and what.. 300kw?) and yet doesn't seem to be restrictive at 7000rpm when it's making 500kw, however I'm obviously not closing the door on that theory.
    • Yeah - Half the problem is I know this sensor actually goes to 150C.. I'm pretty certain it is min of 11C. So still more data required I suppose. It's really quite hard to get the oil temp to 100+ then immediately pull over and take a reading before the temp drops. Annoyingly I suppose the range I really 'want' is likely 80 -> 120C. TBH the ecu can't really *do* anything with it, and the gauge itself is very visible... ...but you know how it is.
    • My EFR 8474 Black, made 800awhp on a roller dyno. at 25-26psi. E85. Shaft speed was around 106,000rpm 1.01 rear. The rear is maxed.  6 boost Turbosmart 60mm gate 3.5inch exhaust  Head is worked to the shithouse. Bain racing. VCam. 272 exhaust. RB28 - RB26 foundation.  You have an intake issue. Start getting proper data and I mean go back to the simple things.  - Pressure test your intake - Block off the Turbo BOV, you don't need it.  - Test pressure before and after your intercooler If your head is pretty stock, that is your issue. Especially if it is NA.  Take it off and spend $10k on it. 
    • Temp = -21.052 X Voltage + 114   That should get you pretty close. Calcs based on two points I could do easy calcs on (30 and 70 degrees).   It also says your sensor should only read as low as 9 degrees when it maxes out at 5V, and should hit a peak of 114 degrees at 0V... Just as a heads up if you were going really cold places, or wanting to be aware when temps really go up with it.
×
×
  • Create New...