Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what kind of driving do you do?

i do 95% city driving at the moment giving it a fair workout around my area and get 400-500 as a usual tank

take it out on the highway and watch that open up to >700 in a tank

City and little bit of highway driving

Isnt it about a 75litre tank?

I get 600ish highway driving.

400 seems excessive.

Yeh thats what i thought......

Full = Projected full tank? I would get about 580-600+ city driving all the time. No mods. Doesn't matter how hard I drive it. I have a GT-8.

We discussed it here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/V3...my-t174972.html

and here

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/V3...my-t174721.html

If you get 400KM only then start looking at servicing bits. AFM, Sparks, O2 sensors.

I've done a proper calculation a few times now.

method was fill up car, reset km's. At the next fill up note, how many k's passed and how many litres i put in to get me to full. results are

1) 441km - 53L = 599km's per tank

2) 442km - 51L = 624km's per tank

3) 444km - 54L = 592km's per tank

4) 410km - 50L = 590km's per tank

Based on the above, if the tank size is 72L (pretty sure) I'm getting approx 600km's per tank. (e.g 441/53*72)

If the tank size is more, I get more k's. And thats bumper to bumper Sydney traffic 5 days a week, 1.5hrs each way each day.

Don't look at when the light goes on to fill up or when your needle hits a quarter etc, as these cars and 350z's are notorious for the fuel guage showing crap.

Try the above, gives you a real idea of how many k's you're getting.

good thinking bobby..

now that you mention it, i always fill up at about 1/8 full, and have never realyl taken into account what fuel was left + reserve and how that could contribute to the kms given on a tank

now if only i could be bothered recording / calculating...

good thinking bobby..

now that you mention it, i always fill up at about 1/8 full, and have never realyl taken into account what fuel was left + reserve and how that could contribute to the kms given on a tank

now if only i could be bothered recording / calculating...

:-)

just note it in a message on your phone.

I'm not normally that anal about these things, but my auto coupe had the Nav system which showed fuel consumption etc, and the manual I have now doesn't. The guage on the manual was telling a very different story to what the auto trip computer was showing so I wanted to check for myself. Also if my guage ever fails I know how far i can go :-)

Both the coupe and sedan have an 80L tank capacity.

I took my first long highway drive today filled up my tank, reset the odo..according to the fuel computer...managed an average of 9.2km per L. At the end of the trip it told me I had 490kms left and I had done approximately 260kms...so thats approximately 750kms! :D

1) 441km - 53L = 599km's per tank

2) 442km - 51L = 624km's per tank

3) 444km - 54L = 592km's per tank

4) 410km - 50L = 590km's per tank

My mileage is about similar to yours with the Z33.

Both the coupe and sedan have an 80L tank capacity.

I took my first long highway drive today filled up my tank, reset the odo..according to the fuel computer...managed an average of 9.2km per L. At the end of the trip it told me I had 490kms left and I had done approximately 260kms...so thats approximately 750kms! :D

LOL goes to show how much you know dude. No one here has managed to fit 80l into their car... ive driven on the light for 80kms and still only managed 72l in - and that was with fuel pissing out the filler.

And you cant say 490 + the estimate - do a real world test :P

I was getting about 520-580 in my coupe and now im down to 450 with a supercharger :(

JK

LOL goes to show how much you know dude. No one here has managed to fit 80l into their car... ive driven on the light for 80kms and still only managed 72l in - and that was with fuel pissing out the filler.

And you cant say 490 + the estimate - do a real world test :D

I was getting about 520-580 in my coupe and now im down to 450 with a supercharger :P

JK

Every single spec sheet I've ever seen for the V35 specifies an 80L tank. Remember that the fuel light is usually pretty pessimistic, running out of fuel can do all sorts of ugly things to the fuel system so the lights are usually set to come on very early.

Everyone, please quote L/km or L/100km, km per tank is meaningless as everyone has a different idea of when to fill up.

My 250GT does 9L/100km on the open road and 11L/100km round town.

LOL goes to show how much you know dude. No one here has managed to fit 80l into their car... ive driven on the light for 80kms and still only managed 72l in - and that was with fuel pissing out the filler.

And you cant say 490 + the estimate - do a real world test :D

I was getting about 520-580 in my coupe and now im down to 450 with a supercharger :P

JK

If you filled up with 72L means that there is approx 8L left in your tank dude. No one will ever manage to fill 80L unless you run your car bone dry till its empty.

My quotes were approximates only and based on the assumption that I would be travelling at 9km/L for the remainder of my fuel tank (which is highly unlikely). Technically thats what the fuel computer is used for...telling you approx how many KMS you have done and how many more you have to go.

I will be able to give you a more accurate reading after I fill up again the 2nd time taking into account how many Ls I top up and how many KMs I have travelled.

Can anyone can beat this?- just 4.3 litres left in the tank!

I had the Japanese girl telling me to fill up asap as soon as i turned the car on!post-21850-1205889777_thumb.jpg

Was that on purpose?

I've heard doing that can suck up the sludge in the bottom of your tank! Unless of course you run it dry before every fill.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...