Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No its not.

You sure about that ?

could it be that my standard fuel pressure regulator has failed because of the better flowing fuel pump?

and the tuner will find that out when he puts the pressure gauge on it.

and the tuner will find that out when he puts the pressure gauge on it.

yes i will leave it up to the tuner but id like to know also to problem solve for myself. narrow things down you know.

just want to know who has seen this sort of problem before or who has had it.

cheers

and the tuner will find that out when he puts the pressure gauge on it.

yes i will leave it up to the tuner but id like to know also to problem solve for myself. narrow things down you know.

just want to know who has seen this sort of problem before or who has had it.

cheers

until 2 weeks ago i was missing 60 rwkws due to the ebc having no power feed to the solenoid.

so it looked like it was working when actually it wasnt.

the power feed to the solenoid also controls your idle up solenoid, so it can also effect your afr's

thats why i mentioned it

Could be a few things but, most will give other symptoms.

A loss of compression will slice power off, to some degree this can happen without appearing a massive smoke fest. Worth a quick compression and leak down test just to check overall engine health. A range of possibillities there.

The cam timing can possibly be at fault if the belt is stretched. If the belt has been changed but, not the idler and tensioner then this is possible. The shift in cam timing can cause a dip.

Small intake leaks. Check the pipes and clamps.

Intake pipe sucking closed. $5 fix for that one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...