Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

plenty of sports have different grades for different player ability.

Yes I agree. As a professional in my chosen sport of golf, we have solved this issue in a number of ways.

We have tournaments purely for the PGA members (Aust PGA, etc)...........cash prizes, cars, trophies and other give-aways.

There are events for the top ranking amateurs (Vardon events etc)............ trophies, titles and prizes up to $1000 value.

There are championships for all qualifiers (Aust Open, State Opens, etc)......combination of above.

Go to any golf course on a Saturday or Sunday and you'll find club members competing against each other for a club trophy,

but as a Club Professional, I cannot compete, eventhough handicaps (mine being scratch) puts all competitors on a level playing

field. Now this may look discriminatory, but those are the competitive rules which, must be laid down, in order to have order.

I can't see why in this Superlap event, divisions and rules (a common thing) should end up being discriminatory.

I don't agree with the comparison of motorsport with golf. In motorsport the machinery plays far and away much more in the results obtained. I know nothing about golf, but I bet I couldn't beat Tiger what ever his name is if I had the Formula 1 of golf equipment and he had the Formual Vee of golf equipment. Conversely, in motorsport there is no way I could beat anyone in a Formual 1 car if I was driving a Formula Vee. The equipment plays too great a role in the potential results. That's why motorsport has always been and always will be classed on the car.

I have personally suffered as result of the stupidity of the driver determining the class in which the car races. In the same (showroom stock standard) car my wife ran in the "Standard" class while I had to run in the "Modified" class. Because I was considered too fast for the "Standard" class even though the car quite obviously didn't belong in the "Modified" class. Needless to say the car determined where I finished in that event.

I am not and never will be in favour of any attempt to classify cars based on who the driver is. It is simply rediculous to even suggest it. If you can't drive, then get yourself along to a race driving school. On a dollar for dollar bassis it will give you faster lap times than any modification you can make to the car. Plus it might just save your life on the road. Boz will show you around Oran Park, teach you more speed in a day than a 200 bhp increase in your engine's power. And at a miniscule amount of the cost.

Cheers

Gary

The bottom line is, that there has NEVER been division or a handicap system based on driver ability. "It goes against every funamental aspect of what motorsport has been developed on" Encouraging inexperienced drivers to pilot big power and inevitably not set up correctly cars above and outside there capabilities on a racetrack is a recipe for disaster

The entire emphasis on motor-racing isnt just about the driver or just about the car. Its a combination to see what talent the driver has to get the best out of the machinery that he is driving.

Here is another one for you; You are saying that drivers who are either paid to drive or paid for driver training are not allowed to run in both classes. Where does that sit Paul Kemal who i know a few workshops are asking if he can drive there cars for these style events... yes he races in a national class of motorsport (Aussie Racing Cars) and that does have sponsorship that supports the cars but he isnt paid anything to drive. This being the case, there shouldnt be any limitations for him to drive in either class?

I won't have my circuit car ready in time but will certainly be there to watch everyone else.

Here is a better view for people that don't know the circuit:

oranpark.jpg

benm everyone knows you are the motorsport fan of all times and will probably be the first there and last to leave, with the biggest smile on his face. This will be by far the biggest event in Australia for Jap imports of all time.

Edited by Boosted Zed

If low teens is the benchmark for open class then I'm assuming maybe 1:20 flat???

Dunno, anyone with experience of this track have any idea??

Penno, Bozman???

Looking over the rules for the cars I don't think they would be that much slower. I am thinking cars in the clubman class should be able to do a 1.16-17.

The Lotus is eligable to run in clubman and would do a 16 standing on its head with those tyres.

If low teens is the benchmark for open class then I'm assuming maybe 1:20 flat???

Dunno, anyone with experience of this track have any idea??

Penno, Bozman???

Looking over the rules for the cars I don't think they would be that much slower. I am thinking cars in the clubman class should be able to do a 1.16-17.

The Lotus is eligable to run in clubman and would do a 16 standing on its head with those tyres.

I might get the zed registered and put street tyres on it. Has full trim less back seat for roll cage, alloy fuel tank might knock me out although could not find mention of this in da rules?

Edited by Boosted Zed
benm everyone knows you are the motorsport fan of all times and will probably be the first there and last to leave, with the biggest smile on his face.

Well actually, if you look at that google map image I posted you can see my ugly head in the pit garage area..... :banana:

I might get the zed registered and put street tyres on it. Has full trim less back seat for roll cage, alloy fuel tank might knock me out although could not find mention of this in da rules?

It appears the regs for each class may need to be more definitive, like John my GTR could be entered into the street class which really would not be fair.

In my oppion if Boz drives his lotus on the road and its his own vehicle, then his elligable for clubman. You cant dictate one set of rules for non "proffesionals" and another for other people. If he attends a normal sprint then his entered accordingly. I for one would be happy to take it to Boz. Just cause his paid to teach etc does not mean his going to be the fastest in the class on the day. (no offence intended to John obviously, his taught me a thing or too as well... but mearly pointing out a fact)

I agree on the driving other peoples cars but not his own.

Edited by Risking

lol but my production car with under 250 at the wheels and over 1500kg has to run open class

rules are rules, they will always advantage some and disadvantage others, no matter what is chosen. With these cars and the sorts of mods they have there would not be much difference in lap times if the street class ran semi slicks.

don't let that get in the way of what should be a great spectacle.

John - I think the quick street cars will be just under 1.20. semis are worth say 4 seconds a lap but there will be some big power cars in street class too. will be interesting to see

Looking over the rules for the cars I don't think they would be that much slower. I am thinking cars in the clubman class should be able to do a 1.16-17.

The Lotus is eligable to run in clubman and would do a 16 standing on its head with those tyres.

Fark, better get some practice laps at OPGP me thinks.... :)

Looking forward to the event, especially having some fun on the track and seeing some of the fastest time attack cars in the country..

The clubman class could get some seriously fast street cars. I look at the rules that they use in Japan for street cars for time attack style events... have you seen how fast some of there cars are now :D

I have raced at Tsukuba about 6 times now and have seen first hand how fast there street cars are :P

Hey if Lofty can do 1.17's in his NA 2 litre Toyota Starlet in IPRA form on crap controlled Yokies, why couldn't a car with alot more freedoms and HP/PS/KW go alot faster :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...