Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

plenty of sports have different grades for different player ability.

Yes I agree. As a professional in my chosen sport of golf, we have solved this issue in a number of ways.

We have tournaments purely for the PGA members (Aust PGA, etc)...........cash prizes, cars, trophies and other give-aways.

There are events for the top ranking amateurs (Vardon events etc)............ trophies, titles and prizes up to $1000 value.

There are championships for all qualifiers (Aust Open, State Opens, etc)......combination of above.

Go to any golf course on a Saturday or Sunday and you'll find club members competing against each other for a club trophy,

but as a Club Professional, I cannot compete, eventhough handicaps (mine being scratch) puts all competitors on a level playing

field. Now this may look discriminatory, but those are the competitive rules which, must be laid down, in order to have order.

I can't see why in this Superlap event, divisions and rules (a common thing) should end up being discriminatory.

I don't agree with the comparison of motorsport with golf. In motorsport the machinery plays far and away much more in the results obtained. I know nothing about golf, but I bet I couldn't beat Tiger what ever his name is if I had the Formula 1 of golf equipment and he had the Formual Vee of golf equipment. Conversely, in motorsport there is no way I could beat anyone in a Formual 1 car if I was driving a Formula Vee. The equipment plays too great a role in the potential results. That's why motorsport has always been and always will be classed on the car.

I have personally suffered as result of the stupidity of the driver determining the class in which the car races. In the same (showroom stock standard) car my wife ran in the "Standard" class while I had to run in the "Modified" class. Because I was considered too fast for the "Standard" class even though the car quite obviously didn't belong in the "Modified" class. Needless to say the car determined where I finished in that event.

I am not and never will be in favour of any attempt to classify cars based on who the driver is. It is simply rediculous to even suggest it. If you can't drive, then get yourself along to a race driving school. On a dollar for dollar bassis it will give you faster lap times than any modification you can make to the car. Plus it might just save your life on the road. Boz will show you around Oran Park, teach you more speed in a day than a 200 bhp increase in your engine's power. And at a miniscule amount of the cost.

Cheers

Gary

The bottom line is, that there has NEVER been division or a handicap system based on driver ability. "It goes against every funamental aspect of what motorsport has been developed on" Encouraging inexperienced drivers to pilot big power and inevitably not set up correctly cars above and outside there capabilities on a racetrack is a recipe for disaster

The entire emphasis on motor-racing isnt just about the driver or just about the car. Its a combination to see what talent the driver has to get the best out of the machinery that he is driving.

Here is another one for you; You are saying that drivers who are either paid to drive or paid for driver training are not allowed to run in both classes. Where does that sit Paul Kemal who i know a few workshops are asking if he can drive there cars for these style events... yes he races in a national class of motorsport (Aussie Racing Cars) and that does have sponsorship that supports the cars but he isnt paid anything to drive. This being the case, there shouldnt be any limitations for him to drive in either class?

I won't have my circuit car ready in time but will certainly be there to watch everyone else.

Here is a better view for people that don't know the circuit:

oranpark.jpg

benm everyone knows you are the motorsport fan of all times and will probably be the first there and last to leave, with the biggest smile on his face. This will be by far the biggest event in Australia for Jap imports of all time.

Edited by Boosted Zed

If low teens is the benchmark for open class then I'm assuming maybe 1:20 flat???

Dunno, anyone with experience of this track have any idea??

Penno, Bozman???

Looking over the rules for the cars I don't think they would be that much slower. I am thinking cars in the clubman class should be able to do a 1.16-17.

The Lotus is eligable to run in clubman and would do a 16 standing on its head with those tyres.

If low teens is the benchmark for open class then I'm assuming maybe 1:20 flat???

Dunno, anyone with experience of this track have any idea??

Penno, Bozman???

Looking over the rules for the cars I don't think they would be that much slower. I am thinking cars in the clubman class should be able to do a 1.16-17.

The Lotus is eligable to run in clubman and would do a 16 standing on its head with those tyres.

I might get the zed registered and put street tyres on it. Has full trim less back seat for roll cage, alloy fuel tank might knock me out although could not find mention of this in da rules?

Edited by Boosted Zed
benm everyone knows you are the motorsport fan of all times and will probably be the first there and last to leave, with the biggest smile on his face.

Well actually, if you look at that google map image I posted you can see my ugly head in the pit garage area..... :banana:

I might get the zed registered and put street tyres on it. Has full trim less back seat for roll cage, alloy fuel tank might knock me out although could not find mention of this in da rules?

It appears the regs for each class may need to be more definitive, like John my GTR could be entered into the street class which really would not be fair.

In my oppion if Boz drives his lotus on the road and its his own vehicle, then his elligable for clubman. You cant dictate one set of rules for non "proffesionals" and another for other people. If he attends a normal sprint then his entered accordingly. I for one would be happy to take it to Boz. Just cause his paid to teach etc does not mean his going to be the fastest in the class on the day. (no offence intended to John obviously, his taught me a thing or too as well... but mearly pointing out a fact)

I agree on the driving other peoples cars but not his own.

Edited by Risking

lol but my production car with under 250 at the wheels and over 1500kg has to run open class

rules are rules, they will always advantage some and disadvantage others, no matter what is chosen. With these cars and the sorts of mods they have there would not be much difference in lap times if the street class ran semi slicks.

don't let that get in the way of what should be a great spectacle.

John - I think the quick street cars will be just under 1.20. semis are worth say 4 seconds a lap but there will be some big power cars in street class too. will be interesting to see

Looking over the rules for the cars I don't think they would be that much slower. I am thinking cars in the clubman class should be able to do a 1.16-17.

The Lotus is eligable to run in clubman and would do a 16 standing on its head with those tyres.

Fark, better get some practice laps at OPGP me thinks.... :)

Looking forward to the event, especially having some fun on the track and seeing some of the fastest time attack cars in the country..

The clubman class could get some seriously fast street cars. I look at the rules that they use in Japan for street cars for time attack style events... have you seen how fast some of there cars are now :D

I have raced at Tsukuba about 6 times now and have seen first hand how fast there street cars are :P

Hey if Lofty can do 1.17's in his NA 2 litre Toyota Starlet in IPRA form on crap controlled Yokies, why couldn't a car with alot more freedoms and HP/PS/KW go alot faster :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...