Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well, because gtrs can never be beaten of course!

ryan, do you laugh every time your car comes on boost?

Yer, its pritty cool a ! Maybe you should sell the gtr and i will help you with a very nice 25 set up. :D

Thanks guys :laugh:

Somethings wrong up top, ill find out exactly what quite soon. There was an incident during the build and i have a feeling that thats the reason its failed - which is good as its not my fault. The motor had been blowing white smoke since i picked it up, but only after a decent rev past 5000rpm, i thought it was the tune (or lack of) but now its pretty clear i was wrong, there was something wrong in there from when i got it

Dry sump fittings are on the engine but its still running a JUN pump (sump setup will be a scavenger setup to a tank in the boot that feeds back to the pickup, so it still uses the JUN pump but flow to the pump wont be an issue, so its slightly different to a normal dry sump :laugh: )

Dam those Lotuses are quick. I think on the day giant will be in the running with both on R compound tyres, and giants supper soft ones. Can't see how new slicks are similar to R compound though?

I went to Wakey on Sat for SAU track day, freezing day about 9c and windy and could not get there until after 2pm due to tow car Commy doing an alternator that morning and long story. Bit of mud on the tack and not good for grip as so cold tracktemps and rain that night and old tyres, bla bla bla managed a 1 min 5.49 a PB, and I was impressed until I put it in perspective with this pesky Lotus, and giant would do this with one flat tyre. Still doing more weight reduction and more power prior to the BIG day but budget does not allow for dog box yet, so will be running the stock gear box still. At least we will look good coming 3rd or 4th or 5th or..................

DSCF4428.JPG

Dirtgarge thieving p...icks, I hate thieves and unfortunately trailers are hot property. Got a pic of what it looked like, never know small world and if unique it might show up one day at a track or on the road going somewhere.

Thanks guys :)

Somethings wrong up top, ill find out exactly what quite soon. There was an incident during the build and i have a feeling that thats the reason its failed - which is good as its not my fault. The motor had been blowing white smoke since i picked it up, but only after a decent rev past 5000rpm, i thought it was the tune (or lack of) but now its pretty clear i was wrong, there was something wrong in there from when i got it

Dry sump fittings are on the engine but its still running a JUN pump (sump setup will be a scavenger setup to a tank in the boot that feeds back to the pickup, so it still uses the JUN pump but flow to the pump wont be an issue, so its slightly different to a normal dry sump :) )

I cannot believe im reading this....

Send it up if you want it done right Steveo....ill give you a student concession on fixing the build. I know of another smoky GTR engine build that had a little something go wrong in the top end too. Got two monster builds on at the moment that will take my time up but ring me if you need any assistance.

John, quick question - why do you keep posting photos of your zed lol :)

Steve - sucks mate, really does suck and I feel for ya mate :)

Here's a thought...how bout you enter club sprint class in the poopra?

Hi Mr Mackie

Don't try and tell us the Lotus is a cheap build :)

Super cool cars which I just love driving.

I heard a rumuor today that Peter Lucas is worried that he may not be fast enough ( only 11's on slicks on the weekend) and is thinking of getting Bargs or Luffy to drive the car at superlap :)

The GT3 Lotus did a 1.09 with Luffy at the wheel, and he thinks it may do a 1.08 (on slicks). That car would never be that fast on R compound :)

I think Peter should drive his car at superlap to give us a chance on the day.

Will be an awesome day. Looking forward to catching up :)

Edited by Bozman1

Hi John,

Well I'm sure our car was a lot cheaper than most of the car in superlap :)

I have no doubt that Peter and Tim would have got into the 1:09s if we put new slicks on. We were both running on well used tyres and new ones are worth 2 seconds easy. Which is why I am hoping that the new R tyres will see us on similar pace to last weekend. See you at Oran!

Hi John,

Well I'm sure our car was a lot cheaper than most of the car in superlap :)

I have no doubt that Peter and Tim would have got into the 1:09s if we put new slicks on. We were both running on well used tyres and new ones are worth 2 seconds easy. Which is why I am hoping that the new R tyres will see us on similar pace to last weekend. See you at Oran!

Our car was 30K...but then broke the world record for labour charges for a GTR street engine build (no, unfortunately we didn't build this one) So yes you car may be cheaper than ours...hehe

Edited by DiRTgarage
Which is why I am hoping that the new R tyres will see us on similar pace to last weekend. See you at Oran!

I wouldn't be relying on it, can't see how a used slick would have the same grip levels as a new R compound tyre.

Anyway, go-karts shouldn't be allowed at superlap, how are you supposed to compete against a 800kg car!!!! :D

It's amazing that a GT-R is exactly double that weight.

Anyhow, Teh GT-R can neva lose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...