Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

thats a very interesting theory. a bit far fetched perhaps, i see no reason why my car would be an auto convert! are there any cosmetic giveaways?

im very interested to hear your results.

hi,

got the car back on saturday, alot later then i expected, but thats always the case with machanics :wave:

now running standard R33 GTST manual box with Auto diff

i didnt get to test a large rev range as i didnt drive on the motor way over the weekend

however i did get the chance to do:

40kmh at 1000rpm and

80kmh at 2000rpm

id like to test 3000rpm but it does look like it will be 120kmh

agreed the theory was a bit far fetched :bunny: so mayby someone replaced the manual diff with an auto for high speeds

agreed the theory was a bit far fetched ;) so mayby someone replaced the manual diff with an auto for high speeds

how bizarre. thanks for your input! i think i may replace the diff down the track, but i guess having taller ratio would be good for highway, but standard ratio would be better for acceleration. im still not convinced my car is abnormal though lol. maybe the speedo is just out a bit haha.

There is a "rolling road" dyno that measures km/h. But is for checking speedo accuracy.

They put a device on the dash which displays speed at the wheels

and compare to speedo speed.

I had my car tested on this dyno. Goes up to 180km/h on the certificate of accuracy.

Edited by SKYPER
  • 1 month later...
how bizarre. thanks for your input! i think i may replace the diff down the track, but i guess having taller ratio would be good for highway, but standard ratio would be better for acceleration. im still not convinced my car is abnormal though lol. maybe the speedo is just out a bit haha.

It IS a bit out... at those speeds, definitely. It's a mechanical speedo, and its definitely not meant to be accurate over its 180km/h limit.

My mrs has a series 1 r31 N/A rb30 auto it sits on 2500 rpm at 100km/h but it goes hard of the line so i did some checking the auto came out with a 4.44 diff centre compared to 3.9/4.11 for the manual. So on take off the auto is comparable to a manual but once you get high in the rev range the auto cannot pull back the manual becuase the manual has the lower diff ratio it can pull more km per rpm. Look to the salt lake racers all of them would be running 2.7 diff ratios but it takes them 1.6 km to get up to speed. Rod hadfiled has built a commodore that does over 400km/h it is a salt lake racer has huge hp but its all in the diff ratio rear box ratio and try diameter.

http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculato...p?action=submit

This is a handy app to use the above to calculate your tyre diameter then fill in the rest this is obviously not concrete but rough guide if you play with it you see the differences in diff ratio and try size play in top speed

http://www.dennysdriveshaft.com/html/poten...calculator.html

Gear ratios can be found here

http://carizma.com.au/Pages/Details%20-%20...e%20-%20R33.htm

Edited by AndyD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...