Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Just a quick q, was driving home from cleveland point a couple weeks back, was around midnight not a car on the road, wasnt paying attention to the speedo or what was even the speed limit was.

anyway one of those stupid vans was on the side of the road and as i drove past "bang" got flashed in the face.. scared the crap outta me when it happened took a couple of seconds to click as to what happened.

my question is, are they allowed to flash you in the face like that with the speed camera's ?? i only just moved up from syd and i remember reading a couple years back about how your not allowed to be flashed in the face, im wondering if the same rules apply up here?

short answer yes they can ticket on coming traffic at night with the use of a "speedlite" aka flash

long answer, there is a huge book of rules that the operators must go by when setting up the vans.

ie. One is at night you must have at least 300metres of clear road before and after the position of the camera unit to avoid accidents caused by the speedlite.

I have heard of people taking these types of fines to court, however you rarelly hear of anyone getting off any fines...

It always boils down to the judge saying "You were speeding, do the crime pay the fine" etc

what if you crash. can you say it was because of the flash?

Thats if you weren't speeding and behind the person who got flashed for speeding.

Firstlly with what im about to say im not saying this is right or moral but;

Who investigates accidents???

What do you think they will determine the outcome of the accident always being even if the flash was a part of the cause???

They will always tun back to the fact you were breaking the law and that if you were not speeding you would have more time to avoid a accident etc

They protect their own, know what i mean?

Thanks for the quick responses guys!!

The road was straight, however there was one of those concrete lil islands straight after the van which i nearly ran up on..

it was more just the unexpected shock, the flash only happened just as i passed the van, i thought i might have hit a door or something, i was driving a grandaddy honda accord my skyline days are well and truely gone, i know speeding is speeding and its "breaking" the law, i just driving to the conditions of the road.

BTW, does squizz still visit the forums ??

cool, the only contention im aware of is if there was a bend in the road less than 300 metres from the van or if the weather conditions were poor...

other than that im not sure you would be able to fight it, plus most of the judges you hear about still issue the fine...

yeah mate squizz is still around... :thumbsup:

Firstlly with what im about to say im not saying this is right or moral but;

Who investigates accidents???

What do you think they will determine the outcome of the accident always being even if the flash was a part of the cause???

They protect their own, know what i mean?

A mate of mine is a crash investigator, he only attends fatals but he takes his job very seriously and i would never question his integratiy especially since they deliever the finding to a judge. If they found that the flash was to blame then i would put money on a strong recommendation that they not flash on coming cars.

i can see your point though it would be just as easy to write the crash off as speed induced.

There probablly is a way out of most fines, but I guess it comes down to how much your willing to spend on legal costs to avoid a fine???

(ie. $5000 in court to escape a $250 fine)

If you got plenty of points id suggest talking it on the chin and live to fight another day...

BTW send Squizz'y a pm, he is online often and may not see this thread...

Yeah, im saying if you are the the car behind the car getting flashed for speeding.

So you yourself aren't speeding but get "shocked" and do something for some reason and crash.

Ah well. I don't really care lol.

Yeah, im saying if you are the the car behind the car getting flashed for speeding.

So you yourself aren't speeding but get "shocked" and do something for some reason and crash.

Ah well. I don't really care lol.

Sorry missed your point first time there Simon...

Yeah if you crashed cause of a flash then maby you might have something to stand on as another driver whom was not speeding at the time...

But remember they could charge you with "Driving with un-due care and attention" as a result of your admission of being distracted...

I honestlly believe that they have most bases covered when it comes to this stuff, even if its unethical or emoral...

I honestlly believe that they have most bases covered when it comes to this stuff, even if its unethical or emoral...
And that, folks, is the crux of the matter. They pretty much have everyone over a barrel, there's too much potential for lost revenue otherwise. I'd also say that the vast majority of possible loopholes or excuses have already been tested in court many times.

All that said, I've wondered before what would happen in this kind of scenario. You or another car nearby are speeding and get flashed by a camera. Fair enough, someone gets booked for speeding - but you crash because the flash temporarily blinds you. That's not undue care and attention because it was THEIR camera's flash that blinded you. There's always the argument that the flash wouldn't have gone off had you not been speeding, but personally I see that a bit like someone with a baseball bat who tells you not to speak and breaks your fingers when you do, then tells you it was your fault for talking.

but personally I see that a bit like someone with a baseball bat who tells you not to speak and breaks your fingers when you do, then tells you it was your fault for talking.

I love your analogies... :D

And your dead right...

Hi Guys,

Just a quick q, was driving home from cleveland point a couple weeks back, was around midnight not a car on the road, wasnt paying attention to the speedo or what was even the speed limit was.

anyway one of those stupid vans was on the side of the road and as i drove past "bang" got flashed in the face.. scared the crap outta me when it happened took a couple of seconds to click as to what happened.

my question is, are they allowed to flash you in the face like that with the speed camera's ?? i only just moved up from syd and i remember reading a couple years back about how your not allowed to be flashed in the face, im wondering if the same rules apply up here?

wow!! thats scary, i've never heard of that happening!! not in SA anyway! we have speed camera's set up in rubbish bins on the side of the road, but thats as risky as it gets here! lol. its hell dangerous having a speed camera flash you in the face, despite if you're speeding or doing something wrong, you could have crashed really badly!!

Your best solution would be to run off the car and into the camera van as you are blinded by the flash.. Of course this is a high risk maneuver :banana: But you would be able to sue the hell out of them for millions, and make sure it was never possible again.

Your best solution would be to run off the car and into the camera van as you are blinded by the flash.. Of course this is a high risk maneuver :D But you would be able to sue the hell out of them for millions, and make sure it was never possible again.

:D

You first Gorden... :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...