Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i am having a major argument with a mate of mine that has an r32 gtst. he recently lost it around a bend and jumped the gutter and smacked the under side of the car on the gutter (he has severelly bend and damaged the thick square tubular looking metal bar which run on each side of the car (he has damaged one of them).

From what i can work out that is the chassis rail as this is what holds the front and the back of the car together. he has damaged it just after the passanger door (between the passanger door and the diff).

he is trying to tell me that it is not structural and that r32's are not full chassis and those bars under the car do nothing for support and what holds the car together is the shell and roof e.t.c????

we came accrossd another problem which i think strengthened my argument when we went to jack up the car to do an oil change. i notices that when the car was NOT jacked up the passanger door opened fine, but when it was jacked up the passanger door seemed to rub when it opened and closed giving me the impression that the car was some how bent??

can somebody please clear this issue up on what holds the skyline together and if the 2 chasis rail looking things are in actual fact chassis rails

thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212032-is-an-r32-gtst-full-chassis/
Share on other sites

You are both wrong. So that is the argument settled.

The chassis rail isn't a true chassis rail in the sense of a seperate chassis body arrangement (think truck, old school four wheel drives).

It is however a not insubstantial part of the structure of the car and therefore should be fixed.

The door flexing thing is actually the whole car twisting when it is jacked up. All cars do this to varying degrees. Typically the newer the design of the car the higher the torsional rigidity of the thing.

ok i understand what your saying but, those too bars that run on the under carrage of the car MUST be the main support for the rear of the car (joining the front to the rear), there is no other solid structure that runs from the front to the back. and every structure needs a solid structure holding it together or it will twist.

i have had 18 carsa and never have i jacked a car up and it has caused the door to now rub and hit the door jam except for one car and it was a daihatsu charade with the most cracked chassis you will ever see (which i new about). every time i jacked it up, the front doors overlapped the front guard thats how bad it was.

even when he came on power hard he sort of noticed the car pulled left a little bit out of the ordinary (this was the same side as the hit and the wheel allignment and sh11t like that was perfect).. the car felt like it had a twist when you come on power hard (flexing under pressure)

They are part of the structure but only part of it.

All structures twist. How much they twist is dependent on their torsional rigidity & ofcourse the load iimposed on them.

The torsional rigidity of cars varies. 5 door cars (ie hatchbacks) are amongst the worst in this respect because of the large openings (from the doors/match) in the MONOCOQUE structure ie the shell of the car that gives it its strength along with the two chassis rails. R32's are not particularly rigid if that is your question.

And yes even Daihatsu Charades torque steer.

I jack my R32 GTST up from any point and all the doors close perfectly fine both with std and aftermarket hard suspension.

I had an old VS commodore that when I would jack up the door would NOT close no matter what. I then read the manual and it stated do not open doors when the car is jacked up lol. Freaked me out when the door was sitting ~40mm off what it should have been.

The VS had whiteline/bilstiens all round; reversing out of the drive way I could hear the front and rear windows creeking over the throb of the mildly tweaked 5litr poo. Sounded nice; didn't go all that well in comparison.

40mm - omg

The doors on my R32 are harder to shut when the front or rear is jacked up as well.

I'm not willing to agree, that Skylines have rigid bodys.. at all :P

Those "chassis rails" as djr said aren't really rails. Its a legacy term used in the modern automotive industry. They're ultra thin gauge and NEVER would I rest them on a chassis stand... although I cant count how many ppl i see do.

Made me a little sad when i felt the door not close properaly, but figure it'll be solved when my cage goes in.

Also, Ive seen that many if not most of the 9s BNR32's in Japan stitch weld the front strut towers, in and around the firewall as well. Supposedly 100's of 4WD 9krpm dumps can weaken that area. When my motors out, I know ill have it braced.

Edited by GeeTR

Not sure on exacts, but iv watched it done b4 - Its mostly labour costs. Done with a TIG to minimize localized heating.

I've seen both 'dots' every 1" along seams, as well as welding 1" 'seams', then 2" gap, 1" seams, 2" gap and so on.

I figure I'd give it a go myself, apart from making sure car is on dead level surface (to prevent chassis preload haha) and letting the work cool every now and then, I cant imagine there’s much involved.

In my case, I need to talk to my engineer about cages, to see if I can tie the strut towers properly to the A frame and firewall (re-route brake lines etc)

ne way

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...