Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

300 RWKW using the GT-RS

I think the one you are thinking of is 'thizzle' he was one of the first guys in AU to get the GT-RS

it was setup at BD4's from memory and it made a touch over 300rwkw with cams and other junk

since then no one else has come close to that mark - im not saying its bullshit or not, but average GT-RS is around 260-270rwkw

there's a few other "high scorers" some that come to mind;

grepin's 2835 setup

thizzles GT-RS setup

again - it doesnt mean the figures are bogus, they are probably legit

but i suspect there some info from the puzzle missing, theres always a reason a car makes more power etc.

you dont make extra power from magic dust or magic tricks.

Interesting discussion guys. I agree with SK that boost isn't what determines horsepower. The formulas are good indications of likely power with standard aftermarket mods, though each car's setup can have so many variables the formulas can't be taken as any more than a guideline.

Certain mods (like cams) will shift an engine's powerband around depending on the setup the owner wants, so this can throw off the calculations as the maximum power at a certain boost pressure will be higher/lower than the same turbo on stock cams. Setups like these would obviously be classified as outliers in graphing power vs boost, so that will automatically distort the formula depending on whether you keep the outliers/disregard them.

There are too many variables to generalise RB25 power levels IMO. But the formulas come very close, closer than an estimate at any extent.

I think your right on the money, i got my 34 dynoed today and i got 240.6kw atw on 15psi. Unfortunately i ran out of fuel as im still waiting on my injectors to come. Ahh well, the gt-rs is a sick turbo, i get full boost at 3200!!!

Hi guys,

I conducted a regression analysis using the output figures and boost ran from the dyno thread relevant to the RB-25 engine with a HKS GT-RS Turbo.

Basically, a regression analysis is a form of statistical modelling that attempts to evaluate the relationship between one variable (Boost - PSI) and another (Power output - RWKW).

This data will help you 'predict' what sort of power you would get if you have an R33 GTS-T (RB-25 engine) with a HKS GT-RS turbo and other supporting mods of course (ie. Front Mount I/C, Full exhaust, Fuel pump etc etc) running the boost of your choice.

Basically, select the amount of boost you wish to run, and look at the corresponding output figure next to it for an estimate of how much power you would be making.

This analysis is ONLY a rough guide, please do no use it as a definite determinant since all cars are individual and differ to one another.

This post should eliminate those repetitive questions such as; 'How much power will I make if I run XX amount of boost with a GT-RS turbo on my R33?'

post-48356-1207094323_thumb.jpg

Cheers!

  • 2 months later...

Nice turbo, just finished tuning a customers car silver SII r33 277rwkw @ 1.1bar which is bit of a suprise as it was bought from the auctions as an unknown.... turns out to be a stolen and recovered jobbie with full whiteline and bilstein handling kit, 555cc injectors, PFC (i had one laying around) and hybrid cooler... and of course a HKS GT-RS

it is almost identical in response to a 8cm T67 kit i did for a customer awhile back but is a little short on top end.

interesting topic...

i just got my car back today with a 2835 pro s (.68) and its making 265 @ 19psi ... click for more detail

bombtrack has a neo gtt with EXACTLY the same mods as me but with tomei cams and will be getting his done soon on the same dyno / tuner

will post results when it happens

Wow at only 1.1bar? That's pretty impressive. Why didn't u run a bit more boost through it, surely it would have still made a bit more power at around 1.3bar...

Yeah, the customer asked for the best result i could get a 1.1bar so i did what i could, it definately would run bigger numbers easily but he's happy :D

there's a few other "high scorers" some that come to mind;

grepin's 2835 setup

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/30...es-t151839.html

thizzles GT-RS setup

I just looked at the dyno chart in that Grepin thread... 322rwkw with sub 10:9 air fuel ratios!?! something not quite right there

would love to get 300rwkw out of the 2835... pointless on the street but would be heaps of fun on the track... I don't think it would quite get there tho

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, there's a very minor drift left that happens a few seconds after letting go of the steering wheel, but not enough to bother me. Enjoying the car still!
    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
×
×
  • Create New...