Jump to content
SAU Community

Splitfire V's Superspark Coils


Recommended Posts

Guest Sinon

One of the ignition coils have started to die on my 32 GTR (only cut's out when very hot)

So I'm looking to replace them. My issuse is I've always said that once they started to go,I'd be getting a set of Splitfire's, As I've been looking around I've run into these Superspark coil's and now can't make my mind up over which to go for.

The splitfire's have been around for ever and have been tested and tried in every imaginable situation and have stood up to everything, they are also avaliable for $489 inc delivery here on Skyline Australia.

The Superspark's are relitiverly new to the market and clam to be 10% better then stock. Some test have been done at Merqury motorsport and clamied result's were a 14% better performance across the rev range. These were also R&D'd right here in Australia. Price $499

I can't find a direct back to back comparasent betwee the too.

Anyone have any idea which one I should go for-The new and unknown or the tried and tested?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213651-splitfire-vs-superspark-coils/
Share on other sites

A friend of mine had a set put in his RB20 Silvia while it was being tuned, It made less power with them (superspark) than it did with the stock coilpacks. They were changed because the stock coilpacks were breaking down over a certain rpm...

yeah but if u buy a secondhand ones from wreckers, who knows how long till they get heat soak and start cracking aswell? or if they arent already got hirline cracks in them, but atleast if u buy new u will know what u got from the start. how much woudl they charge for a secondhand coil packs anyway?

I've only ever replaced mine with stock cheaply from the wreckers. Don't need anything special for 500hp in the GTR, so why spend money I don't have to?

because they are cheap, they are new and most of us couldnt be bothered f**king around at the wreckers trying to find the 1 in 5 good ones for the sake of saving a few hundred bucks

You can treat them for external sealing. It's only electricity so basic laws of insulation apply. I have never needed to add insulation and don't believe I will ever buy the expensive stuff. If I had to I'd run wasted spark external coil packs. I suspect most cracking occurs from washing the engine down hot and getting water around them.

Last couple of coil packs were $15 each with a replacement guarantee for 30 days. Plenty of time to get her hot and run at night to look for shorts. But close inspection at purchase will weed out any problems.

It's a bit like the low impedance injector dropping resistors. You can buy a nice pretty factory GTR one for anywhere up to 250, or a set of 6 high wattage resistors from an electronics store for $10 and they work exactly the same.

Yup, I went through 3 sets of coils in my 33 (mine plus two replacement sets), along with trying the taping/glue methods, including sealing with various goos. In the end I swapped them out for the purty blue Splitfires and all my spark problems went away and never returned, and I could even open my plug gaps back up a bit. I wasn't overly happy with taping and whatnot anyway, I'm a bit of a perfectionist and regardless of how well they might have been insulated, it just felt a bit dodgy. Besides, I always wondered if the second hand coils would perform at their best even if properly insulated, the windings could have been partially melted or in some other way degraded. I did look at Bosch external coils and leads, but it was going to cost very similar money to the Splitfires, but with more mucking around. Still wouldn't mind doing it if/when I build another RB but found it unnecessary at the time.

This is one of those situations where personally, I'd recommend buying new instead of using some DIY :)

I had and still have a similar opinion Marc...

I always thought its not worth blowing or damaging an engine cause i could not afford $899 (at the time) for a set of decent coil packs...

Matt Spry proved to me that a faulty coil pack can have devistating consiquences some times, and after the money I spent on my engine alone an extra $899 was a small price to pay to ensure safe results all day everyday...

Unfortunately the engineer in me, as well as the mechanic of 15 years says the glass is still half full, and I can always do it better and cheaper.

Now we can't all do the same thing, as then there would be no surprises and no novelty, plus these folks would either sell lots or nothing. I'm suggesting a solution that can be both easy and economical. Approaching things in a different way is what made me secure and retired at 39.

So it's not a matter of dollars, but ingenuity and ability. No product is perfect forever, and with electrical products there is a definite initial high failure rate and a high terminal failure rate toward the end of the life of product, so your expensive brand new bits could just as easily do damage early....even on the dyno, as the old factory items might. The fact remains it is extremely hard to destroy an engine through spark loss, while fuel system failure at the same power level is almost a guarantee of catastrophic failure. So how many have made their fuel system secure before the coilpacks were replaced :blink: ? I personally won't be satisfied until each high powered car I have has 3 pumps and a swirlpot. The coilpacks are far less of a concern to me.

I like a good technical discussion :down:

It's not just about dollars, though obviously they come into the equation. I weighed up the pros and cons, and for me new coils with new casings win over worn out old coils with sticky tape every time. The only way I could have been comfortable leaving the stock coils in there would be if I'd sent them off to be rewound and had the casings fixed/replaced properly. That'd probably cost a fair whack I imagine and would be a bit of extra time off the road, when you can just bung in a set of brand newies and be confident that it'll be all good. To me, trying to fix the stock coils was a waste of the ingenuity and ability you mention when there is an easier and arguably superior method that doesn't really cost that much. It's not almost free, but when people are spending $10k on a car at the very least, often much more just in mods, $500 is cheap.

As you mention, things will fail over time, and there will occasionally be faulty parts out of the box, but I'd hazard a guess at the odds being heavily in favour of new parts. It's also not just about failure, the old coils will probably have a weaker spark than when they were new. Choosing the easy, well-tested and almost guaranteed method isn't a cop-out IMHO, why make it harder than it needs to be? I'm all for DIY but in some cases it's wasted effort, particularly when we're not talking about an enormous outlay to do it "properly".

Guest Sinon

Seam's like their's a lot of strong emotions about coil pack's then.

I owned a gts32 for 3 years and have now had a gtr32 for the same amount of time. Back when I had the gts I went though 3-4 coils paying $50 up to $80ea. Yes i've tried the tape's, silicon's and glue.....all are just a patch job.

I've already changed 1 coil in the gtr about 6 months ago.

I decided that I'd rather spend the money once and have the peace of mind knowing that I wouldn't be looking for another one in 6 month's, and wondering if all the coils were working at their best.

It's understandable that forking out up to $1200 for coils back in the day would have put a lot of owner's off, but now that they can be brought for $499 I don't see why anyone wouldn't be getting brand new one's.

Just to let you all know I went with the splitfire's and yes I did notice a differeance. The car pick's up a lot better and run's smoother.

I'd like to compare on a dyno, Stock coil's Vs Splitfire's Vs Superspark's back to back and see which come's up best. Come to think of it why not do a test on all main stream coils been sold in Australia just to put a rest to all the big marketing claim's..........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...