Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

not the biggest fan off it.

dont like the sloping back and tail lights. toyota aurion-like.

interiors ok and they are pretty decent numbers :down:

still..as pround as i am to be an Australian, i dont think i could own an Aussie car. (unless classic muscle)

too common on the roads, next year a new model comes out, which makes the prevous one nothing special, i like cars that stick out and have a bit of timelessness in design

Jap or EURO FTW.

Edited by jake33

fastest Australian built car? didn't 1 of the HSV's run a 12.9 ages ago? and aren't the VE GTS' like 350kw?

I'm not being smart, I'm asking genuine questions...I'm a ford fan over holden after all...

not the biggest fan off it.

dont like the sloping back and tail lights. toyota aurion-like.

interiors ok and they are pretty decent numbers :D

still..as pround as i am to be an Australian, i dont think i could own an Aussie car. (unless classic muscle)

too common on the roads, next year a new model comes out, which makes the prevous one nothing special, i like cars that stick out and have a bit of timelessness in design

Jap or EURO FTW.

The BA design lasted 6 years from 2002 - 2008, its long enough dont you think? Besides, Australian manufacturers don't have the luxury to pour millions on a new design every couple years.

As for your Jap cars.. it changes shape every four years

R32: 1889 - 1993

R33: 1993 - 1997

R34: 1998 - 2002 :D

One interesting thing about the new falcon is that it is still based of the AU falcon. That was the last time the falcon had a clean sheet design. So the chassis was fantastic for its time. And the optional fully independent rear for the AU's was crazy tricky as well. But was dropped from the BA for costs reasons.

So ford aus must have some pretty talented engineers to keep the new falcon at least up to commodore standards.

I really like it and would be happy to own one. Maybe in a manual though. I don't feel involved enough with an auto.

Anyway, my only real criticism about the whole car is the steering wheel looks far from resembling anything that should be in a sports car.... it's f***ing hideous!!! Really bad design & thinking there considering you hold onto and look at it everytime you are in the car because it's right in front of you. Looks like something that belongs in a Winnebago, not an XR6 turbo. :D

OK, so what its like when its not being downhill by grandma...........?

A XT Falcon has a fuel consumption of a 10.1 litres every 100km's.

A XR6 Turbo is 11.1 litres

.... and VE Commodore sucks up 11.3 litres for evert 100km's.

In conclusion, a XR6 Turbo drinks pretty much the same as your ordinary VE Commodore Executive. Both the FG and VE weigh the same at 1700kg's, FG being roughly 50kg's lighter

Edited by Barbarian
I really like it and would be happy to own one. Maybe in a manual though. I don't feel involved enough with an auto.

Anyway, my only real criticism about the whole car is the steering wheel looks far from resembling anything that should be in a sports car.... it's f***ing hideous!!! Really bad design & thinking there considering you hold onto and look at it everytime you are in the car because it's right in front of you. Looks like something that belongs in a Winnebago, not an XR6 turbo. :D

That's why you can always opt for the Premium Sports package that comes with momo steering wheel and gear knob, leather seats, 250w 8 speaker audio, colour Human Machine Interface thingy in the center, ipod integration and bluetooth.

By mid year im thinking of placing my order in ego or vixen color :down:

fastest Australian built car? didn't 1 of the HSV's run a 12.9 ages ago? and aren't the VE GTS' like 350kw?

I'm not being smart, I'm asking genuine questions...I'm a ford fan over holden after all...

Yes that might be the case even though GTS being a premium $80k HSV model, twice the price of a XR6 T.. but im pretty optimistic on FPV F6 giving the GTS a great spanking for its money with a $20k less price tag :D

Fear the Ford & FPV with their inline six turbos :D

Edited by Barbarian
The BA design lasted 6 years from 2002 - 2008, its long enough dont you think? Besides, Australian manufacturers don't have the luxury to pour millions on a new design every couple years.

As for your Jap cars.. it changes shape every four years

R32: 1889 - 1993

R33: 1993 - 1997

R34: 1998 - 2002 :D

i agree with you about changing the shape and model of cars. every car manufacturer does it. by 'timeless design' i was more refering to the shape and model of most falcodores, after new models and series come out the the previous become a little boring and dull. in my opinion anyway

i guess an example for me: seeing an EL XR8 falcon i personally would not think anything of it or even look twice. however if i saw a 32 gtr or a an oldskool rx7, cars like that to me are cars that i would want to own, be more interested in and still have that shape and stigma.

everyones opions diff though.. :D

time will tell anyway.

im sure Wheels mag or Motor will do a VE and FG battle.

they love that shit

Edited by jake33

I want an XR6T with the ZF 6 speed auto. Maybe in 2010, the last year of the I6, I'll try and buy one. :D

I prefer the look of the BA/BF though. Ford's styling direction works really well on the Mondeo, but on the Falcon it just doesn't look right. Its not the "oh no" that the AU was, and still is, but it doesn't have the "niiice" factor the BA (and VE) did when it was unveiled.

That's why you can always opt for the Premium Sports package that comes with momo steering wheel and gear knob, leather seats, 250w 8 speaker audio, colour Human Machine Interface thingy in the center, ipod integration and bluetooth.

By mid year im thinking of placing my order in ego or vixen color :down:

Yes that might be the case even though GTS being a premium $80k HSV model, twice the price of a XR6 T.. but im pretty optimistic on FPV F6 giving the GTS a great spanking for its money with a $20k less price tag :D

Fear the Ford & FPV with their inline six turbos :D

Well the thread title does say 'quickest aussie built car'....one would assume it had set the fastest time of any australian built performance car....

As for the steering wheel, it does look terrible indeed. The BA XR standard wheel was nothing like that, and looked good. buyers shouldn't have to pay $600 for the optional Momo to have a decent looking, sporty steering wheel. A decent looking sporty steering wheel should come standard on a sporty car, with the option of going better again for more money.

Keeping in mind I'm a ford fan...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...