Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Since buying the turbo I have found out it uses a 16cm exhaust housing, which is quite large. We will fit it as is but if it is laggy I'll look into a smaller exhaust housing and depending on how much it is I might go down that path. Here is a picture of the turbo and wastegate together, as you can see the wastegate has been attached to the exhaust housing. It will be fitted tomorrow and my dump+front pipe remade to suit the external wastegate on wednesday all going well should be at the dyno wednesday night. I'll post the graph once its done and some installed pics as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21468-trust-td06-20g-stage-one/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well I thought I got it for a bargain but then we pulled the exhaust housing off and found the engine it'd be on before (mazda rx3) let an apex seal go and it went through the exhaust housing and shattered the exhaust wheel. I cant go into it a great deal as I am going through ACCC with the shop that sold it but to repair it completely will cost and arm and a leg as trust dont sell spare wheels. So we've tried a compromise and we will see how it goes, if it works great and makes max boost before 3500rpm I'll be happy. But as I said it came off a rotary and they flow a lot more gas hence the bigger exhaust housing, so it could be a lag monster yet. btw: I bought it without the wastegate, the wastegate I bought new and was another $650 or so.

Guest 570CK

Its easier / cheaper to do it that way.

"it's good for controlling boost"

No better control then having the wastegate coming off the manifold. Plus it disrupts the flow of air thats suppost to flow into a smaller chamber to blow onto the turbine.

Anyway, external wastegates control boost better. So I'm confused why slapping a wastegate there would make any difference to boost control.

:D

Rob it will work, just changes the characteristics of the exhaust housing.

TD06-20G has a bigger compressor wheel than the TD06-19c - and the exhaust housing that Rob77 has would be considerably larger than what is normally specc'd for an RB series engine. Then again it will probably make alot more power due to that fact.

jms used this turbo on their drift 1via.. made 250rwkw on 1.5 bar i belive.. (rb20).. cept wastegate was put on custom steel block welded on to the existing manifold.. if it has good response for drifting on a rb20 i would say it would be alright on rb25. they also had a rotary style zoorst housing.

I am not sure if putting the external wastegate on the exhaust housing would be such a good idea. I'm no expert, but wouldn't that setup increase the amount of heat as the exhaust housing is gonna be damn hot, and so is the wastegate? I think the real problem with that setup is that you will need a good manifold to suit. Will the manifold be nice flowing and one that is matched?

Anyway, would be interesting to see the results. The turbo does seem pretty big, hopefully not too laggy on the RB25. What happens if you want to change to a smaller exhaust housing? You'll have to weld off the wastegate too right? Another thing, is the manifold a high mount? If so, won't you have problems shutting the bonnet of the car with the wastegate sticking out? Or is it a low mount manifold? Room in the engine bay could be a problem. I guess you could always cut a hole in the bonnet and let the wastegate stick out ;)

Update: turbo's installed car is at the exhaust workshop today getting a new dump+front pipe made up to suit the external wastegate. I'll be going with one that plumbs back into the exhaust gases pipe so that its a bit quieter than a screamer pipe... last thing I need is a yellow sticker :) Fingers crossed it should be ready tonight and we can roll it onto the dyno tonight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...