Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just curious to see how much preload people are running on their ajustable actuators.

i had a problem of apparently not running enough which is why my hiflow could only hold boost at 13 psi.

im getting a retune next week. from 3/4 of a hole of preload i have now loaded it up to 1.8 holes.

what do u guys reccommend as safe preload on a rb25 bush bearing hiflow or any type of hiflow

thanks :)

Edited by R33GOD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/215503-dropping-boost-cant-find-why/
Share on other sites

Simply, the more preload the more boost.

Ive messed around with mine on the GTRS tubo and have it preloaded to run 18psi atm. I ran it for a weekend with the preload to run 25psi and it held the boost perfectly. Just shorten it till you get your desired boost level and see how you go.

RedDrifter is pretty much spot on...just keep shortening the rod...you will find that as you shorten the rod boost response improves...it will reach a point when it will be optimum and shortening the rod more will cause boost to spike...from there you can raise your boost further by using a boost controller...while shortening the rod more will give a higher max boost...it will probably start to spike more too...plus what you really want is for the wastegate flap to stay shut till you reach your desired boost level which won't be the case if you continue shortening the rod as the flap will start to creep open at some point...

I'd be more inclined to adjust the length of the rod till you get good boost response without spiking...then raise the boost with a boost controller...

it spikes to 15 with the rod ajusted to 1.8 holes then comes back down to 12psi. if i tighten it more should the spike be lower and it will hold say 13-14 psi?

but dosent shortening the rod kill the turbo also? shouldnt the boost controller do the rest? or is the reason why its spiking is because i need to tighten more?

confused

How does it kill the turbo?

Its just controlling the actuator. A turbo makes boost, thats it. Only thing that will kill is it objects that shouldnt be there or poor oil/water supply etc.

Gate preload works the same as ext gates and spring rates.

Spiking will be due to the fact its int gate, get a boost controller. Sometimes spiking cant be controlled just off the actuator accurately depending on the setup of the int gate, how big the hole is and so on

ive got a hdi boost controller in it now but i have to get it retuned so i can up the boost more. i just dont get it. its a hiflow. how come its droppin boost so much even though the preload is set at nearly 2 holes. grrrrrrrr

It might not actually be "dropping" boost like you think...its probably set to run 12psi and its spiking to 15psi...try lengthening the rod and then upping the boost via the boost controller...although bear in mind that a slight spike is normal as it is a mechanical system and it needs time to stabilize...

car will not hold boost at all. we tried ramping it up to 20psi but still drops down to 13 psi. damn this car.

these are the turbo specs i got from mtq

Exhaust side

.63 a/r

51.00mm exd.

Comp side.

.60 a/r

55.4mm ind.

preload was set to 2 holes also!!!

wtf is going on

think before you type.

thats a load of crap....

read the part after the comma please, matter of fact... read the sentence after it as well while your there.

it said (incase you still miss it)

get a boost controller

And what did he post later on? He needs a EBC to help control the boost.

Funny that. Picking one section of an entire post is useless when the rest of the post gets the point across.

Maybe read posts twice before you type?

it spikes to 15 with the rod ajusted to 1.8 holes then comes back down to 12psi. if i tighten it more should the spike be lower and it will hold say 13-14 psi?

but dosent shortening the rod kill the turbo also? shouldnt the boost controller do the rest? or is the reason why its spiking is because i need to tighten more?

confused

whats 1.8 holes ???

i have about 8-9mm preload on my 2530 turbos on my 32gtr any less and it won't hold boost even on low psi

i have just got a new set of uprated hks actuators so we'll see how much preload i need to put on these

even with 8mm preload on the standard actuators that came with the 2530's they still open at 13psi without the boost controller switched on i can't believe how much force is behind the wastegates even at 3-4 psi of boost

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...