Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Any ideas of what kind of rwkw a stock R33 with a catback would make? Just put on a JJR front pipe and will be goin for a dyno run this weekend so wanna just get an idea of what kind of increase could be attributed to the front pipe? Im thinking maybe 10rwkw?

Cheers

Daniel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/
Share on other sites

so to make around 200rwkw would i just need about 12 pounds and a fmic?

Maybe... But I think you'll need a little bit more then that... the stock ecu will stop any big power coming out of the engine, no matter what you bolt on... A few guys have managed it, but the majority of us hit R&R before any real power is made...

Edited by nuclear_skyline
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3819499
Share on other sites

depends on how happy the dyno is

I managed 140rwkw on a real dyno without fudged figures with a full exhaust and front mount at 10psi

Then with a Powerfc and 12psi, I managed 209rwkw on the same dyno.

I wouldn't waste your time with a SAFC, get a powerfc, much better to tune.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3819587
Share on other sites

depends on how happy the dyno is

I managed 140rwkw on a real dyno without fudged figures with a full exhaust and front mount at 10psi

Then with a Powerfc and 12psi, I managed 209rwkw on the same dyno.

I wouldn't waste your time with a SAFC, get a powerfc, much better to tune.

lol so your saying your 209 was a dodgy run?

Cause you dont get 69rwkw from 2psi and a tune :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3819639
Share on other sites

if you have a turbo back full exhaust system with a highflow cat, fmic and 10psi i would say expect somewhere from 160-175rwkw.....I have a full exhaust, pod, coilpacks and one freaky motor and made 180rwkw on 7psi apparently....still i dont believe that figure but i guess another dyno run should help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3819861
Share on other sites

My car runs 10psi and a cat back exhaust, no shielded pod and it pulled 161rwkw.

However, it is a R34GTT which of course means its up 20 odd kw at the engine from factory.

my car at this rwkw runs 97mph, which i think is an accurate speed considering my power.

Power always read different, go post a ET with a trap speed and work out your power back from there :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3819951
Share on other sites

ok so now i have a question about the cat... when i got it done the guy said i had a stock cat which could be hiflowed...ive got a couple of mates without a cat at all...so the question is will the exhuast run better with a:

a) A Highflow cat like an xforce which i can get for 160 off the forums

b) Have my existing cat enlarged for 140

c) Have by cat knocked out and just have a straight exhaust

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3832197
Share on other sites

well i have a stock everything....added a full turbo back exhuast system....3" split dump/front pipe, x force hi flo cat, and 3" catback with 5" cannon output....but yeah havent noticed any difference to mine...altho my car wont boost over 5 psi no matter what i do.....so i think i have a acutator leak or something....anyone any ideas?

as for ur cat ideas......the x force 'hi flo' cats arent exactly hi flowing....they have the same 'biscuit' inside that is jus bigger than standard...a high flo cat is set up to have more 'open' biscuit where by air can travel better thru it.....i found this out after i bought and installed the xforce hi flo cat....

also dont remove ur cat or gut ur cat....its illegal and will result in a $10000+ fine if ur caught.....

overall its up to u.....but yeah a proper hi flow cat is around the 350-400 mark!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3832277
Share on other sites

I managed 178rwkw on a stock ecu (mines chip'd though) 10- 11psi - on a mainline dyno, not dynodynamics - would of got more but my coils crapped out when we tried turning the boost up to 12psi

Only mods at the time were bleed valve, FMIC and exhaust that was on it from Japan which I later found out the cat was stuffed anyways

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216185-stock-r33/#findComment-3832360
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...