Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

looking to buy this turbo as i once again blown another hiflowed turbo.

the power figure im looking for would be about 270-280 rwk.

im not a fan of huge boost and wouldnt want to go past the 16-17 psi mark. What combo would i need in terms of a/r, housings would i need to achieve this.

i have all the supporting mods also. car is a r33 gtst. internally standard also.

when does it make full boost also.

Im also looking into a gt3540 but is it over kill for what im chasing.

can i use factory dump also?

this is my setup so far

internally stock rb25det

pfc

z32afm

hiflowed turbo (now busted)

full 3in exhaust

blitz fmic

600cc injectors

tomei intank fuel pump

cushioned button exedy clutch

future mods

power goal :270rwk minimum

splitfire coil packs

gt3076r?

better bov and which one in plumback??? need advice

need some solid advice.

thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216391-looking-to-buy-a-gt3076r-turbo-iw/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Best off doing a search, as this has been covered quite extensively in a few threads, but for 280rwkw, i think the general consensus was that a .63 or .86 3071 offered better response without any major top end power difference, as your not maxing out the 76.

i tried searching but couldnt find what i was looking for.

reason why im looking at the 3076r is not to limit myself in future when i decide to go full rebuild.

just looking for a quick street car for now though have future ambitions for using the car for track

i'm getting a 3076r IW with 0.63 rear tuned at the moment (got similar mods to you), should be ready tuesday. power goal is also 270rwkw

fantastic mate. would love to see your results.

what boost level did your tuner say it would do your power goal at?

do u also have stock internals?

A few people on here have great results with the .63 3076(try the mafia), although most of them find that the exhaust backpressure caused by the .63 limits the power to less than the 76 front can make. IMO .63 3071 for 270-300rwkw or .86 3076 for 300-330rwkw, .86 3582 for 330+

A few people on here have great results with the .63 3076(try the mafia), although most of them find that the exhaust backpressure caused by the .63 limits the power to less than the 76 front can make. IMO .63 3071 for 270-300rwkw or .86 3076 for 300-330rwkw, .86 3582 for 330+

reason why i want the 3076r is due to me wanting to run lower boost levels to achieve the power, and not limit myself.

plus ive read the 3076 dosent come on boost as hard. which is what id want.

just after the opinions of this particular turbo only.

i was going to get the real 3071r but was told by a few sources the 3076 would more comfortably make 270 and be more streetable. plus i opted for the .63 taking into account i wanted less lag and i wasn't chasing >300rwkw

how many are there?

AFAIK there are two different garret comp housings and six different ex housings. I would speak to mafia, as thats the same turbo he has. I believe he thought a .86 3071 would offer the same response with a lower level of detonation, and slightly lower peak power potential(he is making 314rwkw 18 psi), although if you are considering more power down the track, a .63 3076r can be easily upgraded with only an exhaust housing when need be.

Check this thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ga...io-t207931.html

The on-road results for the 0.63 seem pretty good, but there may be some issues with boost control by the sounds of things. They certainly seem to give a big whack of early response, and depending on needs and preferences that may give more torque, earlier, than some people want. Definitely ask Mafia and BHDave what is their general view on this characteristic.

The consensus amongst those of us with a turbine A/R of 0.82 (or 0.87 HKS version) is of progressive, driveable response. Haven't heard a complaint yet. At 270kW it might be a technical difference between 3071 and 3076 rather than something that you can feel or measure, if response is the goal.

As always, it depends on the use of the vehicle, and skill/preference of the driver.

Edited by Dale FZ1

Just specify 2 things up front. You want the waste gate ported as large as possible and you want an actuator rated as close as possible to your expected minimum boost. Do not accept a softer actuator and expect to just wind preload in. You will compromise peak flow out of the waste gate and as it's performance is already marginal you will introduce boost creep issues.

I don't think a 3071 will do much more than a genuine 280rwkw, the compressor just doesn't have the balls. So yeah, the 3076 is the turbo to get if you want 270rwkw with the potential for low to mid 300s.

As far as streetabilty is concerned, the 3071 small compressor, big turbine and small turbine housing gives a very early boost threshold. You end up with a reasonably linear curve and avoid the rapid power increase at 3500-4000rpm you'd have with a bigger compressor and the same rear end. I'd say it's very streetable and perfect for the lazy driver (like me) provided you don't expect to crack the triple ton.

il get an oil pressure test done first then go from there. i actually think the reasons for my hiflows dying is due to modifying the stock bov. wayyy to much compressor surge even on light throttle. comp wheel blew outwards towards the afm...

for the time being im going to run a standard turbo so i can just get my car on the road and run 11 psi or so. well see how that one goes for now

Moving to a GT30 based turbo will be something that should make you smile each time you drive it.

The highflows weren't from Slide were they? There was a few reported failures that seemed related to quality control in assembly/manufacture, rather than anything done/not done on the owner's part after they were fitted.

Main point being, if you are going GT30, do it now rather than spending the time refitting a stocker.

im not used to anything big as this will be my first worthwhile upgrade.

im over hiflows.

Moving to a GT30 based turbo will be something that should make you smile each time you drive it.

The highflows weren't from Slide were they? There was a few reported failures that seemed related to quality control in assembly/manufacture, rather than anything done/not done on the owner's part after they were fitted.

Main point being, if you are going GT30, do it now rather than spending the time refitting a stocker.

i have to wait a couple months til i get a gt30 turbo. need the car on the road quickly. stock turbo is just temporary :)

we just finished putting on a gcg high flow on a mates r33, got it tuned @ maztech, pulled 263 rwkw @ 13.5 pounds spiked to 15psi we got the sheet

some high flows are still good! ive got a gcg on mine and waiting for a retune next week @ racepace.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...