Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys almost finished with the biuld and im a little scared that the turbo choice wont be what im after. The goal in mind is 450rwhp or 340rwkw and im thinking that the turbo wont be up to the task, with seeing dyno results in the 26 section with gt35r's getting just over 340rwkw. Should I go back to twins? Please let me know what you guys think and how you think it will perform.

MOD LIST:

Engine

N1 24U block (own modifications done) race prepped

Chemically cleaned/crack tested and washed

Torque plate bored honed & decked

All new welsh plugs

Tapped oil gallaries

Fully balanced/detailed crank and grub screwed

Race prepped crank gurdle

Shot peened/prepped standard rods with ARP bolts

Full ARP bottem end stud kit

Ross Racing forged pistons (ceramic coated)

ACL race bearings mains & rods

N1 oil pump (modified)

N1 water pump

Genuine Nissan gasket kit

Fully port & polished head

Match ported intake

Brass valve guids

Standard valves

Upgrade valve springs

Standard cams

Greddy adjustable cam gears

Greddy clear timing cover

Polished intake manifold and valve covers

Gates timing belt

New genuine exhaust studs & nuts

Garrett GT3082r turbo polished front cover

Braided oil lines

.82 & 1.06 housings ceramic coated

Tial 44mm wastage

Ebay spec manifold modified

Greddy twin entry air intake pipe

2 x RB25 Air flow meters

3.5" dump pipe

3.5" catback exhaust

600x300x115mm Greddy style intercooler

Custom PBR clutch

Nismo lightened flywheel

Nistune ECU

Sard fuel pressure regulator

custom fuel rail

044 fuel pump

2L surg tank

3/8" Aluminium fuel lines

Heap of speed flow fittings & push lock hose

Sard 700cc injectors

Alloy dual core radiator

Silicone radiator hoses

Silicone heater hoses

25042008009fi7rf6.jpg

Edited by johnbarry88
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216908-what-power-to-expect/
Share on other sites

Whats the 3082... 500 or 550hp?

I had the GT3040 (i think its been renamed) and that was the biggest version of the GT30 frame (600hp)

I made 270rwkw @ 17psi, and 24psi/370rwkw (factory head, cams etc) but that wasnt PULP... so i couldnt see why the 600hp couldnt come close to 320-330rwkw, although you will be leaning on it with at least 24psi IMO and thats pretty heavy going...

I honestly think you'll need the GT35 to get to 340rwkw or much near it.

hahahaha top call ant...love it!

will be good to see it all running and back on the road again!

i will call aorund one time so i can have a look in person...and u can check over those few things on my liner!

Catchya later dude!

Cheers

Matt

My point was to question why you bothered to put those mods down in the list when the topic was about how much power to expect...

he has posted the list in a few different places obviously so he just cut and paste it..... :D

OH i didn't see the twins comment.

IMO go back to twin GTSS or -7's.

You'll make 330rwkw like everyone else has been able too, and it'll be as responsive as the stocker setup :down:

Im bias to twins now ive seen so many banger setups and nothing in a single that matches it.

Standard cams

.82 & 1.06 housings ceramic coated

Hiya, sounds like quite a neat build - though I'm not sure why you'd go to so much effort and stick with the stock cams, I'm not entirely sure if or how much that may conspire against you in going for your power goal. Which turbine housing are you running on it, the .82 or the 1.06??

Also I'm not sure what dyno you will be running on, some of the aggressively low reading dynos over there you may struggle to get that out of a GT3082R though 340kw SHOULD be achieveable on most I'd imagine though no matter what you will be pushing the higher end of what a GT3082R can do. I know someone over here (NZ) running one on his RB25DET R32 GTSt and on slicks he has run 10.1 with a small shot of NOS.

The build has cost me so much $$$ that buying cams now is just not an option (have a mortage to pay off too not easy on apprentice wage) it would be great but impossible rite now, we will be putting cams in later though its the only thing this build does not have. The turbo has the 106 on it now and we'll run with the atm to get peak power out of this setup but if it deems to laggy we will put the 82 back on..

The build has cost me so much $$$ that buying cams now is just not an option (have a mortage to pay off too not easy on apprentice wage) it would be great but impossible rite now, we will be putting cams in later though its the only thing this build does not have. The turbo has the 106 on it now and we'll run with the atm to get peak power out of this setup but if it deems to laggy we will put the 82 back on..

Well my personal opinion/what I would do in your position would be run with the .82a/r with the stock cams and pour a bunch of boost into it make the most of it being a punchy set up. Regardless of how much power it makes, it will be quite punchy though you probably won't have the full top end monster you could have. I reckon it could be quite a fun car though :D

If I remember rightly the .82a/r GT30 turbine side has very similar exhaust flow to a .63 GT35R, and runs exactly the same compressor housing and wheel - so I can't see why it'd not do anything a .63a/r GT3582R would do, maybe SLIGHTLY less flow and better response. Its when you start getting into .82a/r and 1.06a/r GT3582Rs where you will start losing out in my opinion, I'm no expert though haha.

If you intend on later on down the track upgrading cams etc, then you'll have a good idea of if the GT30 turbo is going to be sufficient - going GT2860s or GT2530s would probably be a waste when you already have the turbo and don't have the cams to really justify the extra flow up top. Again, only my opinion.

now that you mention it I think that we'll go with the 82 housing, this is suppose to be a street car after all + its in a r33 gtst so im thinking traction will be a problem but nothing toyo tyres cant fix lol.. Plus the twins are harder to work on if needed and the sigle just simplifies things..

now that you mention it I think that we'll go with the 82 housing, this is suppose to be a street car after all + its in a r33 gtst so im thinking traction will be a problem but nothing toyo tyres cant fix lol.. Plus the twins are harder to work on if needed and the sigle just simplifies things..

I think that'd probably be the way I'd go, especially if you have it in a RWD - I think lack of power isn't going to be your biggest problem ;) For interests sake, if I read it correctly the 1.06a/r GT30 turbine actually flows better than a .82a/r GT35 turbine, and if that is correct and I am not missing something else (which is entirely possible) then using the 1.06a/r you will actually be able to make more power at higher boost than the typical .82a/r GT3582R. Given that the GT design is fairly well suited to bigger a/r housings, and that there is less rotating mass, it makes me wonder if you could end up with a combination almost capable of making similar power AND better response to with a GT35R.

I hope Discopotato03 finds this, and enlightens... or shares an opinion :thumbsup:

Prove it :yes:

All posts in the RB26 upgrade thread beg to argue the fact far as ive seen it

There is only one GT3040R in that thread which I have seen, and it was making ~300kw @ wheels with stock fuel system - the guy never came back (that I am aware of) with a result using the 555cc injectors he promised. Do you know of any others? I know people making well over 300rwkw with GT3076Rs on RB25s, so presumably people would make even more on GT3082Rs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
×
×
  • Create New...