Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

any suggestions? even if I set the threshold very low, eg 1, it will not show the dash light. I am running datalogit which shows that the pfc is reading more than 1 knock so the sensors and wiring to the motor are ok.

globe in the dash is OK but thats as far as my troubleshooting has got.

this is on an r32 gtr which i understand should flash the cat temp warning light.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217143-pfc-not-showing-knock-light/
Share on other sites

hmm hope not, I have a nismo dash and it doesnt have an engine check light.

Can someone confirm? I will change back to std dash if so

if that is the case you might not have to go ack to standard...you could probably wire up a seperate light kinda like a shift light or somthing..my r32 used to flash the check engine....but it was a GTST so that probably does not help you sorry ;)

yeah youd be able to wire up an independant light

get an auto sparkie to help

hey Bunta, almost 2yrs on the the turbo I got from you (that slide hiflowed) is still going strong dude ! ;)

my gtst doesn't have a check engine light. It flashes the exhaust temp light instead :/ As far as i knew no 32's had a separate engine/exhaust warning light, they share the same one.

When you get the stock ecu to give you the error codes it also flashes the exhaust temp light.

There's a single wire coming off the ecu for the check light anyway. Not a hard job to strip a section near the ecu and check for a switched earth (I assume earth as it seems to be the more common switch on the ecu) with a multi meter set for continuity and earthed on the other probe. You could start the car and listen for the annoying beeps if you have knock set to 1 as i'd expect it to have a nice little 5-10 point spike on start up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...