Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It happened to me. The one person who NEVER speaks on the phone while driving!

I got pulled over at around 1am last night cos the cop that came next to me on the freeway saw me holding my phone on my lap. The screen was lit up cos it was playing music.

My deck stopped working so iv just been playing music off my phone when i get really bored of having no sound.

I couldnt be any angrier. I wasn't looking at my phone, wasnt talking on my phone & it was on my bloody lap. It wouldve been 987569859 times more dangerous if i was to take my eyes off the road and adjust my aircon or play with my CD player but i wouldnt have been done for that would I!!

I seriously dont want to drive on the road anymore, crap like this is just a turn off. Because of this im thinking of just unregistering my 33 & using it as a track car only.

Im just really annoyed that this happened to me as iv never spoken on the phone while driving. All my mates are always talking on the phine in full traffic etc and dont get done but i get pulled up for this!

Im fuming.

Edited by Dean_HR31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/
Share on other sites

i know is sucks and he prolly did pull u over for no reason, but it does happen. The law is 2hands on the steerin wheel. ive been pulled over and the copper actually said to me i have one ticket left, what do you want it for? i took it to court and surprise surprise i lost. but good luck with whatever u do.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843148
Share on other sites

absolute f*** pricks. What annoys me, is I used to think they are more leniant if u treat them with the respect the police officer deserves. But it still makes no difference, they treat u like **** shit. I always speak to em in a nice tone, address them as 'Sir' & never show any sought of cocky attitude or anything.

And u get NOTHING in return.

I spent 3 hours on Grand Theft Auto 4 yesterday shooting police in the head several times & then was kicking em while they were dead on the ground.

Believe it or not that made me feel a better. Think i need to play more tonight...

Edited by Dean_HR31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843160
Share on other sites

2 hands on the steering wheel when not changing gears...

ring your phone provider and get the phone records... then consult a lawyer that does a free consult... like one of those no win no fee places...

i can see this going down one of 2 ways.... either you take it to court unrepresented but armed with your phone records and you win... convincingly

OR

the cop then states that you must have been on someone else's phone and then it your word vs a copper... NOT GOOD

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843208
Share on other sites

i know is sucks and he prolly did pull u over for no reason, but it does happen. The law is 2hands on the steerin wheel. ive been pulled over and the copper actually said to me i have one ticket left, what do you want it for? i took it to court and surprise surprise i lost. but good luck with whatever u do.

ALWAYS have your mobile phone sitting in your door or similar place recording when pulled over...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843220
Share on other sites

absolute f*** pricks. What annoys me, is I used to think they are more leniant if u treat them with the respect the police officer deserves. But it still makes no difference, they treat u like **** shit. I always speak to em in a nice tone, address them as 'Sir' & never show any sought of cocky attitude or anything.

And u get NOTHING in return.

you might not get of from doing this.... but you sure will have an easier time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843224
Share on other sites

What exactly is the phone for??

Is it worded "use of a mobile phone", or "use of a mobile communications device while driving"???

The wording will be the key to getting off or not, if it is alleged that you where using a mobile communications device while driving, then they are quite correct, you WHERE using a mobile communications device. Albeit you where not using it as a communicating device, but you where using it no the less.

If they claim you where talking on your mobile phone, then you have very good grounds to fight the claim, because you where not 'using a mobile phone', you where using a music player.

The other thing is phone records will not prove beyond a doubt that you where not using a mobile phone, because they are 1-way transparent (i.e they show you didn't initiate a call, they dont show if you received a call, as doing so would be against the telecommunications privacy legislation).

B.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843378
Share on other sites

you must tell them thier being recorded to use that as everdence i think you will find.

interesting point... i suppose you could tell them...

but they record you for the same reason and dont mention it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843406
Share on other sites

What does the ticket read?

If it reads using/talking on a moble phone whilst operating a motor vehicle, get your itemised phone account make sure no call is infact logged for the booking time or just previous to the booked time.

Take it to the police station in question and see what they'll do.....if they don't bury it take it to court, it should get thrown out.

Edited by madbung
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843484
Share on other sites

get your itemised phone account make sure no call is infact logged for the booking time or just previous to the booked time.

Take it to the police station in question and see what they'll do.....if they don't bury it take it to court, it should get thrown out.

As already mentioned, this means lick-all, because your itemised call records dont show INCOMMING calls, therefore they will claim the call just have been recieved, the phone was still 'in use' and therefore the infringement sticks.

It sucks, but that's the way life goes.

I was almost done for the same thing, but was given a 'formal caution' on keeping my attention on the road when I was changing tracks on my MP3 player.

Same deal, saw the glowing screen, assumed it was a mobile, got pulled over and I told them I didn't even have a mobile on me at the time, it was an mp3 player.

I was told that if they deemed it as such, the MP3 player could be seen as driving without due care, and attract a neg driving infringement.

They basically have nothing btter to do, and innocent until preven guilty is a crock of shit, you have to PROVE TO THEM your innocent!!

B.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843522
Share on other sites

What exactly is the phone for??

Is it worded "use of a mobile phone", or "use of a mobile communications device while driving"???

The wording will be the key to getting off or not, if it is alleged that you where using a mobile communications device while driving, then they are quite correct, you WHERE using a mobile communications device. Albeit you where not using it as a communicating device, but you where using it no the less.

If they claim you where talking on your mobile phone, then you have very good grounds to fight the claim, because you where not 'using a mobile phone', you where using a music player.

The other thing is phone records will not prove beyond a doubt that you where not using a mobile phone, because they are 1-way transparent (i.e they show you didn't initiate a call, they dont show if you received a call, as doing so would be against the telecommunications privacy legislation).

B.

Several factors may negate this argument.

Was the offence in NSW.

Was the driver provisional P1 licence holder.

If this were the case then it is an offence for a P1 licence holder to operate any function of a mobile phone in a car in NSW even if it is not in their hands.

Secondly, case law was introduced in about 2005 statign that any communications function is "using". There was recently amended again to cover any function a phone does, and not just communication. You best argument is whether you were holding the phone, but you already said you were holding it in your lap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843853
Share on other sites

Cop it on the chin hey, bit unlucky but as far as the law is concerned you were in the wrong. Good luck contesting it.

Either way, my opinion bit dangerous having it sitting on your lap while driving don't you think? Its interesting what peoples bodies do in emergencys, and I can tell you now having a phone sitting on your lap playing music isnt good.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3844115
Share on other sites

Either way, my opinion bit dangerous having it sitting on your lap while driving don't you think? Its interesting what peoples bodies do in emergencys, and I can tell you now having a phone sitting on your lap playing music isnt good.

Not too mention what the radiation is doin to your balls! :blink:

That sucks Dean, tough luck. I bet you won't think twice about using your mobile phone while driving in the future, I mean why not, so this cop has effectively caused a potential problem on the road rather than solving one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3846786
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure the Vic laws wording is along the lines of not operating a mobile phone

So technically that would tell me that you are indeed using/operating it.

It doesn’t matter if your changing the time, turning it on silent or calling someone - your still 'operating' it.

Sucks yes.

Is it the law? Yes.

I'd check the wording etc with a lawyer, but depending on that wording will determine if you have a case or you've shot yourself in the foot

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3846836
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...