Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

V-power & V-power racing is back! And isn't as expensive as BP Ultimate which is a good thing for me cuz i go coles for shopping as well which gives me those receipts for d/c :)

By the way is it effective putting in v-power racing into our skylines as imports are tuned for 100RON unleaded from factory? Or does v-power racing require separate tuning?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/219377-shell-v-power-is-back/
Share on other sites

Running on 100ron will decrease your chance of detonation. If your car has been tuned properly on 100 then you may get a marginal increase in power and mileage. You dont NEED to have your car tuned to run 100, its just that its probably not worth the extra money unless your car's been tuned to take advantage of it.

Be warned though, if you tune your car on 100ron it'll be less happy when you inevitably have to put 98 in it! :banana:

Thats just my "2c"... Haha... get it? Ok that was a shit joke... :)

The advice I was given reagrding 98RON fuels, was that V-Power is actually one of the lowest quality ones available. BP's Ultimate, Caltex's Vortex 98 and even the Mobil 8000 were all ranked better by my previous mecahnic?

I say previous because he doesn't service the Skyline, only my Mini Cooper (which is now sold). He was referring specifically to using the fuel in the Mini, but that shouldn't really impact on his opinion of the fuel in general. He's someone who's opinion I hold in quite high regard and I do trust, but it does conflict with what I've heard other people saying?

Anyone got any input on this?

Well the only backup ive got for V-power fuel are my air-fuel ratio on from dyno.

The air-fuel ratio was REAL GOOD using V-power fuel. but then again most effective way is for a power fc to detect the level of knocks on different fuels i think?

I was actually surprised with the fuel price last night. Mobil in Epping was selling Unleaded for 1.37L..Cheap. I still went to pennant hills though and put V Power in my SS. For some reason, it justs likes V Power better.

Either way, V Power is back..Woo hoo...

V power is the second highest rated performance fuel, I dont think you mechanic is on the right page!!

Caltex is number one, 1KW ahead.

Good im glad v power is back, caltex just flows through my tank too easily

How can you rate fuel in kw's? :thumbsup:

So... Which is better performance/fuel pump wise? V-Power or V-Power Racing?

A while ago I was hearing a few stories of people using the V-Power Racing and it was screwing with their fuel pump, can anyone verify this? I use the BP Ultimate...

I just want what's best for my baby :D lol

Higher octane fuel is denser than regular fuel, so if your fuel pump almost dead anyway then it might make it struggle to the point that it dies completely. Othewise the high octane fuel/fuel pump thing is bollocks.

Also being higher density means that the car runs richer. If your car is running rich to start with then it may not be beneficial at all to make the car run more rich. As i said before, if you're car is tuned for 100 ron then it takes advantage of the lower chance of detonation and allows you to run a more aggressive tune = more power.

At the end of the day, its only 2 ron points so its not going to be a huge difference anyway!

Higher octane fuel is denser than regular fuel, so if your fuel pump almost dead anyway then it might make it struggle to the point that it dies completely. Othewise the high octane fuel/fuel pump thing is bollocks.

Also being higher density means that the car runs richer. If your car is running rich to start with then it may not be beneficial at all to make the car run more rich. As i said before, if you're car is tuned for 100 ron then it takes advantage of the lower chance of detonation and allows you to run a more aggressive tune = more power.

At the end of the day, its only 2 ron points so its not going to be a huge difference anyway!

E10 is typically 3% less dense than 91 Octane ULP but has a higher octane rating. It is a similar situation for V-Power (98) and the 5% ethanol blended V-Power racing (100 octane).

Yeah you're right, ethanol lowers the energy density of the fuel. I forgot 100ron is 2% ethanol. Higher octane petroleum is higher in density than its lower octane counterpart though.

Here's some interesting results on the potential power gain by using 100ron: http://www.racefuels.com.au/dynoDetail.asp?ID=59

It looks like about 3.5% peak power gain, and 4.8% peak torque gain between 98RON and 100RON Shell fuel... Keep in mind that they advanced the tuning by 2 degrees and leaned the AF ratio to take advantage of the better fuel so I wouldnt be expecting to get anything near these results without tuning or at least a car with active knock sensors.

Yeah you're right, ethanol lowers the energy density of the fuel. I forgot 100ron is 2% ethanol. Higher octane petroleum is higher in density than its lower octane counterpart though.

Here's some interesting results on the potential power gain by using 100ron: http://www.racefuels.com.au/dynoDetail.asp?ID=59

It looks like about 3.5% peak power gain, and 4.8% peak torque gain between 98RON and 100RON Shell fuel... Keep in mind that they advanced the tuning by 2 degrees and leaned the AF ratio to take advantage of the better fuel so I wouldnt be expecting to get anything near these results without tuning or at least a car with active knock sensors.

Yeah people get trapped and stooged to a degree.

Trapped because fuel is added to the engine in volume not by weight. So a less dense fuel can will give you a higher AFR. Add oxygen in the fuel & you can get yourself in trouble. Wonderful thing if tuned properly, however.

Stooged because you buy fuel by the litre not the kg. So your less fuel efficient E10 (measured in km/litre) costs more than it should.

V power is the second highest rated performance fuel, I dont think you mechanic is on the right page!!

Caltex is number one, 1KW ahead.

Good im glad v power is back, caltex just flows through my tank too easily

wow a whole 0.5% improvement lol........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...